European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 111, Issue 4, pp 381–389 | Cite as

Germination of Gibberella zeae ascospores as affected by age of spores after discharge and environmental factors

  • Marco BeyerEmail author
  • Joseph-Alexander Verreet


The effects of age of ascospores (0–18 days after discharge), photon flux density (0–494 μmol m−2 s−1 PAR), temperature (4–30 °C), frost (−15 °C for 30 min), relative humidity (RH; 0–100%), pH (2.5–6.5) and dryness (0 and 53% RH for up to 40 min) on the germination of the ascospores of the mycotoxin-producing fungus Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fusarium graminearum) were studied. Freshly discharged ascospores germinated within 4 h at 20 °C and 100% RH. The rate of germination and the percentage of viable ascospores decreased over time after the spores were discharged from perithecia. The time course of ascospore germination was not significantly affected by photon flux density. The period of time required to obtain 50% germinated ascospores at 100% RH was 26.90 h at 4 °C, 10.40 h at 14 °C, 3.44 h at 20 °C and 3.31 h at 30 °C. There was no significant effect of frost on the percentage of viable ascospores. A small percentage (6.6 ± 3.8%) of the ascospores germinated at 53% RH. At RH ≥ 84% and 20 °C almost 100% of the freshly discharged ascospores germinated. The time course of ascospore germination was affected by pH. The maximum rate of ascospore germination was estimated to be at pH 3.76. Ascospores lost their ability to germinate following exposure to 0% RH almost instantaneously. No germinating spores were detected after an incubation period of 1 min at 0% RH. Incubating the ascospores at 53% RH decreased the percentage of viable spores from 93 to 6% within 10 min. The data demonstrate that age of spores, relative humidity, temperature and pH, but not photon flux density, are key factors in germination of G. zeae ascospores.


desiccation Fusarium graminearum head blight mycotoxins spores 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ayerst, G 1969The effect of moisture and temperature on growth and spore germination in some fungiJournal of Stored Products Research5127141Google Scholar
  2. Bai, G-H, Shaner, G, Ohm, H 2000Inheritance of resistance to Fusarium graminearum in wheatTheoretical and Applied Genetics10018Google Scholar
  3. Beyer, M, Röding, S, Ludewig, A, Verreet, J-A 2004Germination and survival of Fusarium graminearum macroconidia as affected by environmental factorsJournal of Phytopathology1529297Google Scholar
  4. Bottalico, A, Perrone, G 2002Toxogenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with head blight in small-grain cereals in EuropeEuropean Journal of Plant Pathology108611624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown DW, Desjardins AE, Yun S-H, Plattner R, Lee T, Dyer R and Turgeon BG (2001) Are Gibberella zeae sexual spores the critical inoculum leading to FHB epidemics? Proceedings of the National Fusarium Head Blight Forum, December 8–10, 2001, Erlanger, KY, USA, p. 104.Google Scholar
  6. Clausen, CA, Green, F 1996Characterization of polygalacturonase from the brown-rot fungus Postia placentaApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology45750754Google Scholar
  7. Fernando, WGD, Miller, JD, Seaman, WL, Seifert, K, Paulitz, TC 2000Daily and seasonal dynamics of airborne spores of Fusarium graminearum and other Fusarium species sampled over wheat plotsCanadian Journal of Botany78497505Google Scholar
  8. Fernando, WGD, Paulitz, TC, Seaman, WL, Dutilleul, P, Miller, JD 1997Head blight gradients caused by Gibberella zeae from area sources of inoculum in wheat field plotsPhytopathology87414421Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, J, Abramson, D, McCallum, BD, Clear, R 2001Comparison of Canadian Fusarium graminearum isolates for aggressiveness, vegetative compatibility, and production of ergosterol and mycotoxinsMycopathologia153209215Google Scholar
  10. Inch, S, Fernando, WGD, Gilbert, J, Tekauz, A 2000Temporal aspects of ascospore and macroconidia release by Gibberella zeae and Fusarium graminearumCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology22186Google Scholar
  11. Jin, Y, Zhang, X, Osborne, L 2001Survival of Gibberella zeae ascospores on the plant surfacePhytopathology91S44Google Scholar
  12. Klittich, CJR, Leslie, JF 1988Nitrate reduction mutants in Fusarium moniliforme (Gibberella fujikuroi)Genetics118417423Google Scholar
  13. Ludewig, A 2003Zur Bedeutung des Mykotoxins Deoxynivalenol im Wirt/Parasit - System Weizen / Fusarium graminearumUniversity of KielGermanyDissertationGoogle Scholar
  14. Markell, SG, Francl, LJ 2003Fusarium head blight inoculum: species prevalence and Gibberella zeae spore typePlant Disease87814820Google Scholar
  15. McMullen, M, Jones, R, Gallenberg, D 1997Scab of wheat and barley: A re-emerging disease of devastating impactPlant Disease8113401348Google Scholar
  16. Mesterházy, Á 2002Role of deoxynivalenol in aggressiveness of Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum and in resistance to Fusarium head blightEuropean Journal of Plant Pathology108675684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miedaner T, Schilling AG and Geiger HH (2001). Molecular genetic diversity and variation for aggressiveness in populations of Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum sampled from wheat fields in different countries. Journal of Phytopathology: 641–648.Google Scholar
  18. Nelson, PE, Toussoun, TA, Marasas, FO 1983Fusarium Species: An Illustrated Manual for IdentificationUniversity Park, Pennsylvania State University PressUSAGoogle Scholar
  19. Nirenberg, HI 1976Untersuchungen über die morphologische und biologische Differenzierung in der Fusarium-Sektion LiseaolaMitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Berlin-Dahlem127193Google Scholar
  20. Paulitz, T 1996Diurnal release of ascospores by Gibberella zeae in inoculated wheat plotsPlant Disease80674678Google Scholar
  21. Paulitz T (1999). Epidemiology of Fusarium head blight in eastern Canada – When and where. Proceedings of the Canadian Workshop on Fusarium Head Blight: 43–44Google Scholar
  22. Schollenberger, M, Jara, HT, Sucy, S, Drochner, W, Müller, HM 2002Fusarium toxins in wheat flour collected in an area in southwest GermanyInternational Journal of Food Microbiology728589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Schulze, K, Schönherr, J 2003Calcium hydroxide, potassium carbonate and alkyl polyglycosides prevent spore germination and kill germ tubes of apple scab (Venturia inaequalis)Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz1103645Google Scholar
  24. Sinha, KK, Bhatnagar, D 1998Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food SafetyMarcel DekkerNew York, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Sussman, AS, Douthit, HA 1973Dormancy in microbial sporesAnnual Review of Plant Physiology24311352Google Scholar
  26. Sutton, JC 1982Epidemiology of wheat head blight and maize ear rot caused by Fusarium graminearumCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology4195209Google Scholar
  27. Sung, JM, Cook, RJ 1981Effect of water potential on reproduction and spore germination by Fusarium roseum ‘graminearum’, ‘culmorum’ and ‘avenaceum’Phytopathology71499504Google Scholar
  28. Trail, F, Common, R 2000Perithecial development by Gibberella zeae: A light microscopy studyMycologia92130138Google Scholar
  29. Trail, F, Xu, H, Loranger, R, Gadoury, D 2002Physiological and environmental aspects of ascospore discharge in Gibberella zeae (anamorph Fusarium graminearum)Mycologia94181189Google Scholar
  30. Tschanz, AT, Horst, RK, Nelson, PE 1976The effect of environment on sexual reproduction of Gibberella zeaeMycologia68327340Google Scholar
  31. Wexler, A 1995Constant humidity solutionsLide, DR eds. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics.CRC PressBoca Raton, USA1523Google Scholar
  32. Zeller, KA, Bowden, RL, Leslie, JF 2004Population differentiation and recombination in wheat scab populations of Gibberella zeae from the United StatesMolecular Ecology13563571PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PhytopathologyChristian-Albrechts-University KielKielGermany

Personalised recommendations