Advertisement

European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 89–123 | Cite as

Corporate insolvency procedures in England: the uneasy case for liquidations

  • Régis Blazy
  • Nirjhar Nigam
Article
  • 114 Downloads

Abstract

Our paper investigates a comprehensive sample of 574 English corporate insolvency cases, including direct liquidation cases. In contrast to other insolvency procedures, liquidations perform poorly on average and fail to produce satisfactory repayments to creditors. We run multinomial Logit regressions to explain the choice between liquidation and reorganization. We obtain three main results. First, we confirm that size matters: distressed firms owning low assets have higher chances of being liquidated immediately. Second, the presence of secured creditors decreases the risk of direct liquidation. This provides a clue that in England, the most-informed creditors adapt their strategies and turn away from the less-performing procedures. Third, we find that the likelihood of administration—which appears nowadays as the main alternative to direct liquidation—significantly depends on the proportion of fixed/current assets owned by the firms.

Keywords

Liquidation Reorganization Receivership Administration Corporate insolvency England 

JEL Classifications

G33 G38 K20 K22 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) financed this research (EURODEF program: http://www.agence-nationale-recherche.fr/Project-ANR-12-BSH1-0013). We are grateful to the journal’s referees. Any remaining errors are ours.

References

  1. Aghion, P., Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1992). The economics of bankruptcy reform. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 8, 523–546.Google Scholar
  2. Angele, J. (2008). Insolvenzen, 2007. Wirtschaft und Statistik, Statistisches Bundesamt, 4, 303–311.Google Scholar
  3. Armour, J., Black, B., Cheffins, B., & Nolan, R. (2009). Private enforcement of corporate Law: An empirical comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6(4), 687–722.Google Scholar
  4. Armour, J., & Frisby, S. (2001). Rethinking receivership. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21, 73–102.Google Scholar
  5. Armour, J., Hsu, A., & Walters, A. (2008). Corporate insolvency in the United Kingdom: The impact of the enterprise act of 2002. European Company and Financial Law Review, 5(2), 135–158.Google Scholar
  6. Armour, J., & Mokal, R. (2004). Reforming the governance of corporate rescue: The enterprise act 2002. In ESRC Centre for Business Research Working Paper (p 288). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.567306.
  7. Ayyagari, M., Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2007). Small and medium enterprises across the globe. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 415–434.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2008). Financing patterns around the world: Are small firms different? Journal of Financial Economics, 89(3), 467–487.Google Scholar
  9. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Benveniste, I. (1986). Receivers: Double agents or surrogate liquidators? Accounting and Business Research, 16(63), 245–250.Google Scholar
  11. Berkovitch, E., Israel, R., & Zender, J. F. (1997). Optimal bankruptcy law and firm specific investments. European Economic Review, 41, 487–497.Google Scholar
  12. Blazy, R., & Chopard, B. (2012). (Un)secured debt and the likelihood of court supervised reorganization. European Journal of Law and Economics, 34(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
  13. Blazy, R., Chopard, B., & Nigam, N. (2013a). Building legal indexes to explain recovery rates: An analysis of the French and English bankruptcy codes. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(6), 1936–1959.Google Scholar
  14. Blazy, R., & Combier, J. (1997). La défaillance d’entreprise: causes économiques, traitement judiciaire et impact financier. Economica, INSEE Méthodes, 72–73.Google Scholar
  15. Blazy, R., Deffains, B., Umbhauer, G., & Weill, L. (2013b). Severe or gentle bankruptcy law: Which impact on investing and financing decisions? Economic Modelling, 34, 129–144.Google Scholar
  16. Bond, S., Elston, J. A., Mairesse, J., & Mulkay, B. (2003). Financial factors and investment in Belgium, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom: A comparison using company panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 153–165.Google Scholar
  17. Boyer, T., & Blazy, R. (2014). Born to be alive? The survival of innovative and non-innovative French micro-start-ups. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 669–683.Google Scholar
  18. Brier, G. W. (1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
  19. Bris, A., Welch, I., & Zhu, N. (2006). The costs of bankruptcy: Chapter 7 liquidation vs Chapter 11 reorganization. Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1253–1303.Google Scholar
  20. Brouwer, M. (2006). Reorganization in US and European bankruptcy law. European Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1), 5–20.Google Scholar
  21. Citron, D., & Wright, M. (2008). Bankruptcy costs, leverage and multiple secured creditors: the case of MBOs’. Accounting and Business Research, 38(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
  22. Cook, G., & Pond, K. (2006). Explaining the choice between alternative insolvency regimes for troubled companies in the UK and Sweden. European Journal of Law and Economics, 22(1), 21–47.Google Scholar
  23. Couwenberg, O., & de Jong, A. (2008). Costs and recovery rates in the Dutch liquidation-based bankruptcy system. European Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 105–127.Google Scholar
  24. Davydenko, A. S., & Franks, J. (2008). Do bankruptcy codes matter? A study of defaults in France, Germany, and the U.K. Journal of Finance, 63(2), 565–608.Google Scholar
  25. Dewaelheyns, N., & Van Hulle, C. (2008). Legal reform and aggregate small and micro business bankruptcy rates: Evidence from the 1997 Belgian bankruptcy code. Small Business Economics, 31(4), 409.Google Scholar
  26. Drucker, P. F. (1970). Business objectives and survival needs in technology, management and society (pp. 149–165). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  27. Eberhart, R., Eesley, C. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2016). Failure is an option: Institutional change, entrepreneurial risk and new firm growth. In Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper (p 111).Google Scholar
  28. Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Rebmann, A. (2017). Prospect theory and the effects of bankruptcy laws on entrepreneurial aspirations. Small Business Economics, 48(4), 977–997.Google Scholar
  29. Everett, J., & Watson, J. (1998). Small business failure and external risk factors. Small Business Economics, 11(4), 371–390.Google Scholar
  30. Fama, E. F. (1990). Contract costs and financing decisions. Journal of Business, 63(1), S71–S91.Google Scholar
  31. Franks, J., & Sussman, O. (2005). Financial distress and bank restructuring of small to medium size UK companies. Review of Finance, 9, 65–96.Google Scholar
  32. Frisby, S. (2004). In search of a rescue regime—the enterprise act 2002. Modern Law Review, 67(2), 247–272.Google Scholar
  33. Frisby, S. (2006). Report on insolvency outcomes. The Insolvency Service. http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/insolvencyprofessionandlegislation/research/corpdocs/InsolvencyOutcomes.pdf. Accessed Feb 2011.
  34. Frouté, P. (2007). Theoretical foundation for a debtor friendly bankruptcy law in favour of creditors. European Journal of Law and Economics, 24(3), 201–214.Google Scholar
  35. Grunert, J., & Weber, M. (2009). Recovery rates of commercial lending: Empirical evidence for German companies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(3), 505–513.Google Scholar
  36. Hart, O. (2006). Different approaches to bankruptcy. CESifo DICE Report, IFO Institute for Economic Research, 4(1), 3–8.Google Scholar
  37. Haugen, R. A., & Senbet, L. W. (1988). Bankruptcy and agency costs: Their significance to the theory of optimal capital structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(1), 27–38.Google Scholar
  38. Hughes, A. (2013). Short-termism, impatient capital and finance for manufacturing innovation in the UK. In Government Office for Science, Foresight Future of Manufacturing Project, Evidence Paper 16 (p. 116).Google Scholar
  39. Insolvency Service (2001). Insolvency—A second chance. The Stationery office, CM 5234, (London: DTI). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/263523/5234.pdf. Accessed Feb 2011.
  40. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.Google Scholar
  41. Laitinen, E. K. (2011). Assessing viability of Finnish reorganization and bankruptcy firms. European Journal of Law and Economics, 31(2), 167–198.Google Scholar
  42. Lubben, S. J. (2012). What we “know” about Chapter 11 cost is wrong. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law., 17(1), 141–187.Google Scholar
  43. Miwa, Y., & Ramseyer, M. J. (2008). The implications of trade credit for bank monitoring: Suggestive evidence from Japan. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 17(2), 317–343.Google Scholar
  44. Morrison, E. R. (2007). Bankruptcy decision making: An empirical study of continuation bias in small-business bankruptcies. The Journal of Law and Economics, 50(2), 381–419.Google Scholar
  45. Rasmussen, R. K. (1992). Debtor’s choice: A menu approach to corporate bankruptcy. Tex. L. Rev., 71, 51.Google Scholar
  46. Ravenscraft, J. D. (1983). Structure-profit relationships at the line of business and industry level. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(1), 22–31.Google Scholar
  47. Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B., & Wretman, J. (2003). Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Small, K. A., & Hsiao, C. (1985). Multinomial logit specification tests. International Economic Review, 26, 619.Google Scholar
  49. Succurro, M. (2012). Bankruptcy systems and economic performance across countries: some empirical evidence. European Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 101–126.Google Scholar
  50. Sundgren, S. (1998). Does a reorganization law improve the efficiency of the insolvency law? The Finnish experience. European Journal of Law and Economics, 6, 177–198.Google Scholar
  51. Thorburn, K. (2000). Bankruptcy auctions: Costs, debt recovery, and firm survival. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 337–368.Google Scholar
  52. Titman, S. (1984). The effect of capital structure on a firm’s liquidation decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(1), 137–151.Google Scholar
  53. Van der Schans, D. (2012). SME access to external Finance. In Department for Business Innovation & Skills, Government of the United Kingdom, BIS Economics Paper, 16, January (p 48).Google Scholar
  54. Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1999). Financial characteristics of businesses in bankruptcy. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 73(3), 499–589.Google Scholar
  55. Webb, D. C. (1987). The importance of incomplete information in explaining the existence of costly bankruptcy. Economica, 54, 279–288.Google Scholar
  56. Wehinger, G. (2012). Bank deleveraging, the move from bank to market-based financing, and SME financing. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 2012(1), 65–79.Google Scholar
  57. Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D., & Cardon, M. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 361–375.Google Scholar
  58. White, M. J. (1989). The corporate bankruptcy decision. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), 129–151.Google Scholar
  59. World Bank. (2018). Reforming to create jobs. Washington: Doing Business Annual Report.Google Scholar
  60. Wruck, K. H. (1990). Financial distress, reorganization, and organizational efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 419–444.Google Scholar
  61. Weiss, L. A. (1990). Bankruptcy resolution. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2):285–314.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EM Strasbourg Business School, IEP Strasbourg, LARGEStrasbourgFrance
  2. 2.ICN Business School, CEREFIGE and LARGEMetzFrance

Personalised recommendations