European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 321–348 | Cite as

Liberal coercion? Prostitution, human trafficking and policy

  • Seo-Young ChoEmail author


Liberal prostitution policy aims at improving labor conditions for prostitutes and protecting victims of forced prostitution. Given its policy mandates, legalized prostitution should be linked to better protection policies for trafficking victims and stronger anti-trafficking measures. In this paper, I investigate empirically whether or not legalized prostitution improves protection policies for victims, as it is presumed. The results of my analysis—using data from 149 countries for the period of 2001–2011—suggest that a liberal prostitution policy does not lead to better protection and, in some cases, legalized prostitution can be detrimental to protecting victims of human trafficking.


Prostitution Victim protection Human trafficking 

JEL Classification

J15 J16 K14 K37 



The author thanks Lukas Stroemsdoerfer and Douglas Pierce for their research assistance.


  1. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baetschmann, G., Staub, K., & Winkelmann, R. (2015). Consistent estimation of the fixed effects ordered logit model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 178(3), 685–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry, K. (1995). The prostitution of sexuality. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Belser, P. (2005). Forced labour and human trafficking: Estimating the profits. International Labour Office Working Paper 42/2005. Geneva.Google Scholar
  5. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies, 104, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapkis, W. (1997). Performing erotic labor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Charnysh, V., Lloyd, P., & Simmons, B. (2015). Frames and consensus formation in international relations: The case of trafficking in persons. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho, S.-Y., Dreher, A., & Neumayer, E. (2013). Does legalized prostitution increase human trafficking? World Development, 41, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho, S.-Y., Dreher, A., & Neumayer, E. (2014). The determinants of anti-trafficking policies: Evidence from a new index. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(2), 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho, S.-Y., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2012). Compliance with the anti-trafficking protocol. European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danailova-Trainor, G., & Belser, P. (2006). Globalization and the illicit market for human trafficking: An empirical analysis of supply and demand. ILO Working Paper No. 78. International Labour Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
  13. Das, M., & van Soest, A. (1999). A panel data model for subjective information on household income growth. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 40, 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Die Welt. (2013). Prostitution—hier noch mehr Zahlen (Prostitution—Here again more numbers). November 3rd, 2013.
  15. Ekberg, G. (2004). The Swedish law that prohibits the purchase of sexual services: Best practices for prevention of prostitution and trafficking in human beings. Violence against Women, 10(10), 1187–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farley, M., Cotton, A., Lynn, J., Zumbeck, S., Spiwak, F., Reyes, M., et al. (2003). Prostitution and trafficking in nine countries: An update of violence and posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Trauma Practice, 2, 33–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economics Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hughes, D., & Roche, C. (1999). Making the harm visible: Global sexual exploitation of women and girls. Speaking out and providing services. Kingston, RI: CATW.Google Scholar
  19. Immordino, G., & Russo, F. F. (2015). Laws and stigma: The case of prostitution. European Journal of Law and Economics, 40, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2010). Counter trafficking module. Geneva.Google Scholar
  21. Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2011). Gender equity and prostitution: An investigation of attitude in Norway and Sweden. Feminist Economics, 17, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2013). The law and economics of international sex slavery: Prostitution law and trafficking for sexual exploitation. European Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jakobsson, N., & Kotsadam, A. (2014). Shame on you, John! law, stigmatization, and the demand for sex. European Journal of Law and Economics, 37(3), 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeffreys, S. (1997). The idea of prostitution. Melbourne: Spinifex Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper No. 5430.Google Scholar
  26. Kempadoo, K., & Doezema, J. (1998). Global sex workers: rights, resistance, and redefinition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Lancaster, T. (2000). The incidental parameter problem since 1948. Journal of Econometrics, 95, 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahmoud, T., & Trebesch, C. (2010). The economics of human trafficking and labor migration: Micro-evidence from Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(2), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marshall, M. G., & Jaggers, K. (2009). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2009.
  30. O’Neill, M. (2001). Prostitution and feminism: Towards a politics of feeling. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Outshoorn, J. (2005). The political debates on prostitution and trafficking of women. Social Politics, 12(1), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pheterson, G. (1996). The prostitution prism. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Potrafke, N. (2013). Policies against human trafficking: The role of religion and political institutions. CESifo Working Paper No. 4278, Munich.Google Scholar
  34. Raymond, J. (2004). Prostitution on demand. Violence against Women, 10, 1156–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roodman, D. (2005). xtabond2: Stata module to extend xtabond dynamic panel data estimator. Statistical Software Components No. S435901, Boston.Google Scholar
  36. Roodman, D. (2007). A short note on the theme of too many instruments. Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 125, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  37. Stock, J., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression (chapter 5). In D. Andrews & J. Stock (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Truong, T.-D. (1990). Sex, money and morality: The political economy of prostitution and tourism in South East Asia. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  39. United Nations. (1949). Convention for the suppression of the traffic in persons and of the exploitation of the prostitution of others. New York.Google Scholar
  40. United Nations. (2000). Convention against transnational organized crime and its protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children. New York.Google Scholar
  41. United Nations. (2007). World abortion policies. United Nations Publication, Sales No. E.07.XIII.6. New York.Google Scholar
  42. United Nations Treaty Collection. (2013). Ratification of the protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children.
  43. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2006). Trafficking in persons: Global patterns. Vienna.Google Scholar
  44. United States Department of State. (2001–2011). Country report on human rights practice. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  45. United States Department of State. (2001–2013). Trafficking in persons report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wooldridge, J. (2011). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. World Bank. (2013). World development indicator.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group of Empirical Institutional Economics, Faculty of EconomicsPhilipps-University of MarburgMarburgGermany

Personalised recommendations