Substituting piracy with a pay-what-you-want option: does it make sense?
Rather than tolerating piracy or increasing sanctions, an artist can release his product directly to consumers by allowing them to download it under a ‘pay-what-you-want’ online strategy. We show analytically that this strategy can (1) be more profitable than a strategy with perfect or imperfect intellectual property rights enforcement for the artist and (2) change the organization and allocation of added value between artists and publishers along the supply chain. This higher profit result is achieved through an increased demand for live performance and positive voluntary contributions of downloaders directly pocketed by the artist. Indeed, a ‘pay-what-you-want’ strategy allows artists to reduce piracy without using sanctions while benefiting from a strategic negotiation ‘weapon’ in the relationship with record labels. Moreover, consumers draw procedural utility from the way the product is delivered. Counter-intuitively, rather than advocating for elimination of conventional releases at posted prices, pay-what-you-want strategies may need them to remain successful. A brief case study of Radiohead’s experiment and anecdotal evidence are developed to support these theoretical insights. Some implications regarding the re-organization of the supply chain and property rights regime are drawn.
KeywordsBehavioral economics Free download Music Piracy
JEL classificationM13 Q28
- Bellemare, M. F., & Holmberg, A. M. (2009). The determinants of music piracy in a sample of college students working paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1481272, Visited on December, 23, 2009.
- Burke, A. E. (2003). Music business. In R. Towse (Ed.), Handbooks of cultural economics (PP. 321–330). Chelterham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Castiglione, C. (2008). NIN Ghosts I–IV, Amazon’s Bestselling Album of 2008 Was Released Under A Creative Commons License! http://www.ccastig.com/2009/01/11/nin-ghosts-i-iv-amazon%E2%80%99s-bestselling-album-is-under-a-creative-commons-license/. Visited on April 25, 2009.
- Gayer, A., & Shy, Oz. (2003). Copyright protection and hardware taxation. Information Economics and Policy, 15, 467–483.Google Scholar
- Gibson, O. (2007). Radiohead’s bid to revive music industry, pay what you like to download albums. The Guardian, 2 October, http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/oct/02/ digitalmedia.musicnews. Visited on March 15, 2009.
- Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Nelson, L. D., & Brown. A. (2010). Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science, 5989(329), 325–327.Google Scholar
- Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M., & Spann, M. (2010). Kish: Where customers pay as they wish. Review of Marketing Science, 8, Article 3, Available at: http://www.bepress.com/romsjournal/vol8/iss2/art3.
- Kühn, K. (2009). London restaurants “Pay What You Want” scheme succeeds, chain leader, March 14: http://www.chainleader.com/article/386875-London_Restaurants_Pay_What_You_Want_Scheme_Succeeds.php: Visisted on March 30, 2009.
- Liebowitz, S. J. (2004). The elusive symbiosis, the impact of the radio on the record industry. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 1, 93–118.Google Scholar
- Lipsman, A. (2007). Radiohead freeloaders abound but does the business model work? http://www.comscore.com/blog/2007/11/radiohead_freeloaders_abound_b.html. Posted on November 5, 2007. Visited on April 25, 2009.
- Mortimer, J. H., & Sorensen, A. (2006). Supply responses to digital distribution: Recorded music and live performances. AEA annual meeting papers. Boston, MA: January 6–8, 2006. http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2006papers.html.
- Music, A. (2008). Warner Chappell reveals Radiohead’s ‘In Rainbows’ pot of gold. http://musically.com/blog/2008/10/15/exclusive-warner-chappell-reveals-radioheads-in-rainbows-pot-of-gold/. Posted on October 15, 2008; Visited on July 25, 2009.
- Peitz, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2004). The effect of internet piracy on CD sales—cross section evidence. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, 1, 71–79.Google Scholar
- Rambonilaza, T. (2009). Il n’y a pas d’arc en ciel sans orages, de la valeur monétaire de la musique. Mimeo. http://tina.rambonilaza.googlepages.com/Radiohead.pdf. Undated, Visited on April 25, 2009.
- Regner, T. (2010). Why consumers pay voluntarily: Evidence from online music. Jena Economic Research Papers 2010-081, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Planck-Institute of Economics.Google Scholar
- Reisman, R. (2010). FairPay: The future of a radical pricing process. An adaptive pricing process that can change the game in the media/content industry. Available at http://www.teleshuttle.com/FairPay/FairPayFuture.htm. Visited on December 15, 2010.
- Riener, G., & Traxler. C. (2011). Norms, moods, and free lunch: Longitudinal evidence on payments from a pay-what-you-want restaurant. Journal of Socio-Economics, 718, 1–6.Google Scholar
- Roe A. (2007). A Kirkland café with no prices. The seattle times, February 6. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2003558690_terrabite06e.html. Visited on April 4, 2010.
- Rose, M. J. (2000). Stephen King’s ‘Plant’ uprooted. Wired. http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2000/11/40356. November 11: Visited on February 15, 2010.
- Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules, a strategic guide to the network economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Tyrangiel, J. (2007). Radiohead says, pay what you want. Time. http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1666973,00.html. Visited on April 25, 2009.
- Zimmerman, D. L. (2003). Authorship without ownership: Reconsidering incentives in a digital age. DePaul Law Review, 52, 1121–1170.Google Scholar
- 2D BOY. Pay-what-you-want birthday sale results. http://2dboy.com/2009/10/19/birthday-sale-results/. Posted on October 19, 2009; Visited on November 16, 2009.