European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 359–370 | Cite as

Protection of ownership in family firms: post-sale purchase clauses and management perspective

  • Lars-Göran SundEmail author
  • Per-Olof Bjuggren


In many small and medium sized family firms of corporate form there is a desire to protect ownership structure through restrictions on transferability of shares. At first sight this can appear strange as one often mentioned advantage of the corporate form is that it provides for high transferability of shares whereby a large amount of equity easily can be accumulated. But looking around in the real world, most family firms are not listed and have an interest in the control of changes in ownership structure through clauses that restrict transferability of shares. In this paper this interest of control of ownership is taken for granted. The focus is instead on providing a contractual analysis of the pros and cons of different clauses that restrict transferability. What do the spectra of restricting clauses look like? In what transferability situation can it be more efficient to use a certain clause? Does it matter if a person controlling the use of the firm’s assets has a majority ownership and/or is the manager of the firm? We further focus on the impact on management of post-sale purchase clauses, which are common only in the Nordic countries and thereby provide an indigenous perspective. How do succession matters enter into the picture? These are the type of questions that this paper aims to provide answers to. In the description of clauses the Swedish situation is the base case with a short discussion on how Sweden differs in this respect or is similar to the rest of the world.


Protection and transferability of shares Family firms 

JEL Classification

K11 K12 K22 G34 


  1. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.Google Scholar
  2. Andenaes, M. H. (2006). Aksjeselskaper og allmenaksjeselskaper. Oslo: Lobo Media.Google Scholar
  3. Belcher, D. I. (1994). Buy-sell agreements for family businesses. American Law Institute (C 939 ALS-ABA 211).Google Scholar
  4. Bjuggren, P.-O., & Sund, L.-G. (2002). A transaction cost rationale for transition of the firm within the family. Small Business Economics, 19(2), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chemla, G., Ljungqvist, A., & Habib, M. A. (2007). An analysis of shareholder agreements. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(1), 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Easterbrook, F. H., & Fischel, D. R. (1991). The economic structure of corporate law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eschenlohr, H. (2000). Beschränkungen der Austritts- und Kundigungsmöglichkeiten des Gesellschafters einer Familien-Gmbh. In Festschrift fur Walter Sigle (pp. 131–143). Köln: OVS Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton, R. W., & Booth, R. A. (2006). Corporations (5th ed.). St. Paul: Thomson.Google Scholar
  9. Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2004). What is corporate law? In R. Kraakman, et al. (Eds.), The anatomy of corporate law (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R., & Squire, R. (2006). Law and the rise of the firm. Harvard Law Review, 119(5), 1335–1403.Google Scholar
  11. Holderness, C. G. (2003). Joint ownership and alienability. International Review of Law and Economics, 23(1), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Madelon, C., & Thomsen, S. (2009). Contracting around ownership: Shareholder agreements in France. In P.-O. Bjuggren & D. C. Mueller (Eds.), In the modern firm, corporate governance and investment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  14. MassMutual. (2002). American Family Business Survey. Springfield, MA.Google Scholar
  15. O’Neal and Thompson’s Close Corporations and LLCs Law and Practice. 3rd ed. Westlaw.Google Scholar
  16. Rosenberg, N., & Birdzell, L. E., Jr. (1986). How the west grew rich. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Schmidt, K. (2002). Gesellschaftrecht. Berlin: Heymanns.Google Scholar
  18. Sund, L.-G., & Bjuggren, P.-O. (2007). Family-owned, limited close corporations and protection of ownership. European Journal of Law and Economics, 23(3), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tannenbaum, F. D. (1998) What every business lawyer and business owner should know about buy-sell agreements. Practicing Law Institute. Corporate law and practice course handbook series (1089 PLI/Corp 441).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Commercial LawJönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsJönköpings International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations