European Journal of Law and Economics

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 57–78 | Cite as

Rethinking governmental licensing of higher education institutions

  • Karsten Mause


In many countries around the world, governmental authorities control the market entry of new providers of higher educational services. By means of ex-ante licensing in the higher education sector, government ensures that students are only confronted with academic programs and institutions that at least meet certain minimum quality standards. This quality-assuring intervention by government may be taken for granted. From an economic viewpoint, however, it seems worthwhile to scrutinize the regulatory status quo. In order to rethink existing licensing arrangements’ raison d’être, the present paper addresses the question whether governmental market entry control in the higher education industry is necessary at all.


Accreditation Certification Higher education Licensing Quality assurance 

JEL Classifications

D18 D45 H11 I28 K20 


  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for ‘Lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderman, G., & Brown, R. (2005). Can quality assurance survive the market? Accreditation and audit at the crossroads. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(4), 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beales, H. (1998). Licensing and certification systems. In P. Newman (Ed.), The new palgrave dictionary of economics and the law (Vol. 2, pp. 578–581). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bickerstaffe, G. (2002). Accreditation: Do business schools really need the seal of approval? Times Online, October 3, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. Bodenhöfer, H.-J. (1985). Probleme der Bildungsfinanzierung – Zum Stand der Diskussion. In G. Brinkmann (Ed.), Probleme der Bildungsfinanzierung (pp. 9–38). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, J. M. (2003). Public choice: Politics without romance. Policy, 19(3), 13–18.Google Scholar
  7. Burke J. C. (ed.). (2005). Achieving accountability in higher education. Balancing public, academic, and market demands. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Cave, M., Dodsworth, R., & Thompson, D. (1992). Regulatory reform in higher education in the UK: Incentives for efficiency and product quality. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 8(2), 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CHEA. (1998). Recognition of accrediting organizations. Policy and procedures. Washington: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.Google Scholar
  10. CHEA. (2002). The fundamentals of accreditation. What do you need to know? Washington: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.Google Scholar
  11. CHEA. (2005). Results of a survey of accrediting organizations on practices for providing information to the public. Washington: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.Google Scholar
  12. CHEA. (2006). Directory of CHEA recognized organizations 2006–2007. Washington: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.Google Scholar
  13. Curran, C. (1998). Regulation of the professions. In P. Newman (Ed.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and the law (Vol. 3, pp. 247–255). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law & Economics, 16(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dickeson, R. (2006). The need for accreditation reform. Issue paper, “A national dialogue: The secretary of education’s commission on the future of higher education,” Washington: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  16. Eaton, J. S. (2003). Accreditation and recognition in the United States. Paper presented at: OECD/Norway Forum on trade in educational services. Managing the internationalisation of post-secondary education. 3–4 November 2003, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
  17. Eaton, J. S. (2006). An Overview of U.S. accreditation. Washington: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.Google Scholar
  18. El-Khawas, E. (2001). Accreditation in the United States: Origins, developments and future prospects. Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  19. Ewell, P. T. (2004). Accreditation and the provision of additional information to the public about institutional and program performance. Washington: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.Google Scholar
  20. Ezell, A., & Bear, J. (2005). Degree mills. The billion-dollar industry that has sold over a million fake diplomas. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hadfield, G. K., Howse, R., & Trebilcock, M. J. (1998). Information-based principles for rethinking consumer protection policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 21(2), 131–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holcombe, R. G. (2003). Eliminating scope of practice and licensing laws to improve health care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31(2), 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirshleifer, J. (1973). Where are we in the theory of information? American Economic Review, 63(2), 31–39.Google Scholar
  25. Kehm, B. M. (2006). The German System of Accreditation. Research Program on Public Policy for Academic Quality (PPAQ), Policy Analysis Paper, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Public Policy.Google Scholar
  26. Kleiner, M. M. (2000). Occupational licensing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leland, H. E. (1979). Quacks, lemons, and licensing: A theory of minimum quality standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1328–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lohmar, B. & Eckhardt, Th. (2007). The Education System in the Federal Republic of Germany 2005. A description of the responsibilities, structures and developments in education policy for the exchange of information in Europe. Bonn: Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany.Google Scholar
  29. Mause, K. (2007a). Konsumentenschutz im Hochschulbereich. Unvollständige Nachfragerinformation, Marktversagen und markt-basierte Schutzmechanismen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  30. Mause, K. (2007b). Market-based instruments for consumer protection in higher education. Mimeo. University of Marburg (Germany), Department of Economics. Under review.Google Scholar
  31. McPherson, M. S., & Winston, G. C. (1993). The economics of cost, price, and quality in U.S. higher education. In M. S. McPherson, M. O. Schapiro, & G. C. Winston (Eds.), Paying the piper. Productivity, incentives, and financing in U.S. higher education (pp. 69–107). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  32. McPherson M. S., Schapiro M. O., & Winston G. C. (1993). Introduction. In M. S. McPherson et al. (Eds.), Paying the piper. Productivity, incentives, and financing in U.S. higher education (pp. 3–13). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  33. Moore, T. G. (1961). The purpose of licensing. The Journal of Law & Economics, 4, 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy 78(2), 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy 82(4), 729–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ogus, A. (2000). Self-regulation. In B. Bouckaert & G. De Geest (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics (Vol. V, pp. 587–602) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  37. Ogus, A. I., & Zhang, Q. (2005). Licensing regimes East and West. International Review of Law and Economics, 25(1), 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwartz, A., & Wilde, L. L. (1979). Intervening in markets on the basis of imperfect information: A legal and economic analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127, 630–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Selden, W. K. (1960). Accreditation. A struggle over standards in higher education. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  40. Stannek, A. & Ziegele, F. (2005). Private higher education in Europe. A National Report on Germany. Working Paper No. 71, Gütersloh: Centre for Higher Education Development.Google Scholar
  41. Stiglitz, J. E. (1975). Information and economic analysis. In M. Parkin (Ed.), Current economic problems (pp. 27–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Svorny, S. (2000). Licensing, market entry regulation. In B. Bouckaert & G. De Geest (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics (Vol. III, pp. 296–328). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  43. Swagler, R. M. (1978). Students as consumers of postsecondary education: A framework for analysis. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 12(1), 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, J. S., & Machado, M. L. (2001). A critique of regional U.S. accreditation with comparisons to CRE quality audits. Paper presented at 23. EAIR Forum in Porto, Portugal, 8–12 September 2001.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, N. (2000). Playing with numbers. How U.S. news mismeasures higher education and what we can do about it. The Washington Monthly 32(9), 16–23.Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Diploma mills and accreditation. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Department of Education. (2007). Accreditation in the United States. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  48. U.S. Department of State. (2006). If you want to study in the United States. Booklet 3. Short-term study, english language programs, distance education, and accreditation. Washington: U.S. Department of State.Google Scholar
  49. Viscusi, W. K. (1978). A note on ‘lemons’ markets with quality certification. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(1), 277–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolff, R. A. (2005). Accountability and accreditation. Can reforms match increasing demands? In J. C. Burke (Ed.), Achieving accountability in higher education. balancing public, academic, and market demands (pp. 78–103). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Academy for Technology Assessment Bad Neuenahr-AhrweilerBad Neuenahr-AhrweilerGermany

Personalised recommendations