Risk of lung cancer and physical activity by smoking status and body mass index, the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study
- 250 Downloads
We aimed to investigate physical activity (PA) and risk of different histological subtypes of lung cancer according to smoking status and body mass index using repeated measurements in a large cohort of women in Norway. The study sample for the multiple imputation analyses consisted of 86,499 and for the complete-case analysis 80,802 women. Repeated measurements of PA level, smoking habits, weight, and height were available for 54,691 women (63.2%), who were included in repeated measurement analyses combined with multiple imputation to address attrition. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. During a median follow-up of 12.9 years, 866 cases of primary lung cancer were identified. We found an inverse association between PA and lung cancer overall. The results were consistent from multiple imputed data analysis to complete-case analysis of PA and possible confounders. We observed a similar trend for adenocarcinoma, but not for squamous cell or small cell carcinomas. Our findings suggest a more pronounced association between lung cancer overall and PA levels in current and former smokers, and in normal-weight and overweight participants with increasing PA levels. The potential of a modifiable lifestyle factor as PA to reduce the risk of lung cancer independently of smoking status is important in public health.
KeywordsLung cancer Physical activity Smoking Prospective study Women
This project received financial support from the Norwegian Extra Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation through EXTRA funds, Grant No. 2012/2/0048-1220048001.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 3.Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2015—cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway; 2016.Google Scholar
- 9.Duan P, Hu C, Quan C, Yi X, Zhou W, Yuan M et al. Body mass index and risk of lung cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16938. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16938. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep16938#supplementary-information.
- 10.Vainio H, Bianchini F. IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention. Volume 6: weight control and physical activity. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. France: IARC Press; 2002.Google Scholar
- 11.World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007.Google Scholar
- 12.World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Cancer: a Global perspective. Continuous Update Project Expert Report; 2018. http://www.dietandcancerreport.org.
- 18.Emaus A, Thune I. Physical activity and lung cancer prevention. In: Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM, editors. Physical activity and cancer. Berlin: Springer; 2011. p. 101–33.Google Scholar
- 25.Lund E, Kumle M, Braaten T, Hjartåker A, Bakken K, Eggen A, et al. External validity in a population-based national prospective study—the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14(10):1001–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CACO.0000007982.18311.2e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.WHO. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th Revision. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2015/en. 2010. Accessed 13 Nov 2017.
- 36.Patel AV, Carter BD, Stevens VL, Gaudet MM, Campbell PT, Gapstur SM. The relationship between physical activity, obesity, and lung cancer risk by smoking status in a large prospective cohort of US adults. Cancer Causes Control. 2017;28(12):1357–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0949-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Inoue M, Yamamoto S, Kurahashi N, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S. Daily total physical activity level and total cancer risk in men and women: results from a large-scale population-based cohort study in Japan. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168(4):391–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Thune I, Lund E. The influence of physical activity on lung-cancer risk: a prospective study of 81,516 men and women. Int J Cancer. 1997;70:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970106)70:1%3c57:AID-IJC9%3e3.0.CO;2-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Steenland K, Nowlin S, Palu S. Cancer incidence in the National Health and Nutrition Survey I. Follow-up data: diabetes, cholesterol, pulse and physical activity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1995;4(8):807–11.Google Scholar
- 45.Alfano CM, Klesges RC, Murray DM, Bowen DJ, McTiernan A, Vander Weg MW, et al. Physical activity in relation to all-site and lung cancer incidence and mortality in current and former smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13(12):2233–41.Google Scholar
- 48.Land SR, Liu Q, Wickerham DL, Costantino JP, Ganz PA. Cigarette smoking, physical activity, and alcohol consumption as predictors of cancer incidence among women at high risk of breast cancer in the NSABP P-1 trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2014;23(5):823–32. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-1105-t.CrossRefGoogle Scholar