An anatomy of the way composite scores work
- 283 Downloads
Recently, epidemiologists tend to focus on the association of health outcomes with combinations of exposures (composites), defined a-priori or a-posteriori. Such composites appear often in nutritional (dietary patterns) and genetic (genetic scores) epidemiology. The estimated associations, however, have not been linked to those of the components of the composite, at least in a systematic way. We considered composites (X) which are linear combinations of more than one exposures (components of the composite) and explored the association of X with a linear heath outcome (Y) in terms of the associations of its individual components with Y. We showed that: (1) the association of X with Y is a weighted average of the associations of the components of X with Y; (2) the weights depend on the estimated covariance matrix of the components, and on the scalar used for the linear combination, and; (3) when components are binary variables and X is a simple sum of its components, the weights depend solely on the proportion of “1”s that are present in each component and are common with the others. Using data from a cohort study in Greece we illustrated these properties for: (1) the a-priori Mediterranean diet score; (2) an a-priori genetic predisposition score, and; (3) an a-posteriori dietary pattern. Our findings may be important in interpreting estimated associations of composites with health outcomes, or, in designing composites that are expected to capture most of the associations of their components with health outcomes (new genetic scores, or composites of biomarkers).
KeywordsComposite scores Dietary patterns Genetic scores A-posteriori patterns
European Union Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007–2013) under CHANCES Project (Grant Agreement No. HEALTH–F3-2010–242244); Hellenic Health Foundation. We thank Antonia Trichopoulou for making available EPIC-Greece data for this study.
Conflict of interest
- 11.Newby PK. Tucker KL. Empirically derived eating patterns using factor or cluster analysis: a review. Nutr Rev. 2004;62:177–203.Google Scholar
- 12.Fransen HP, May AM, Stricker MD, et al. A posteriori dietary patterns: how many patterns to retain? J Nutr. 2014;144:1274–82.Google Scholar
- 16.DeVellis, RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2003. ISBN 0-7619-2604-6.Google Scholar
- 19.Trichopoulou A, Yiannakouris N, Bamia C, Benetou V, Trichopoulos D, Ordovas JM. Genetic predisposition, nongenetic risk factors, and coronary infarct. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:891–6.Google Scholar
- 20.Costacou T, Bamia C, Ferrari P, Riboli E, Trichopoulos D, Trichopoulou A. Tracing the Mediterranean diet through principal components and cluster analyses in the Greek population. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57:1378–85.Google Scholar
- 26.Chang S-W. Choice of weighting scheme in forming the composite. Bull Educ Psychol. 2009;40:489–510.Google Scholar
- 27.Bind MA, Coull B, Suh H, et al. A novel genetic score approach using instruments to investigate interactions between pathways and environment: application to air pollution. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096000. eCollection 2014.