Declining incidences of hip fractures are reported from western countries. Norway has among the highest rates in the world. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in total hip fracture rates in Norway between 1999 and 2008 and risk of second hip fractures. All hospitalizations given a hip fracture diagnosis code (International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 or ICD 10) (cervical, trochanteric or subtrochanteric) in Norwegian hospitals were retrieved with accompanying surgical procedure codes and additional diagnoses. A total of 93,123 hip fractures were identified between 1999 and 2008 in persons ≥50 years. Annual incidences of hip fractures were calculated and tested for trends. Rates of first and second hip fractures (2006–2008) were compared. The age-standardized total incidence of hip fracture decreased by 13.4 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 11.0–15.6) in women and 4.8 % (95 % CI: 0.7, 8.7) in men. Age-adjusted rates of second hip fractures did not change in the observation period. In those with a prior hip fracture, the age-standardized risk of a subsequent hip fracture was 2.5-fold (95 % CI: 2.5, 2.6) in women, and 4.6-fold (95 % CI: 4.5, 4.7) in men. Total hip fracture rates declined in both genders during 1999–2008, whereas rates of second hip fractures did not change.
Hip fracture Incidence Osteoporosis Norway Women Men
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
The authors are deeply grateful to system architect monitoring Tomislav Dimoski at The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services who developed the system that enabled extraction and transfer of data from PAS. He and his team also carried through the collection of the hip fracture data. Senior advisor Dominic Hoff at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health helped with data processing. The authors thank the staff at the Department of Pharmacoepidemiology (Norwegian Institute of Public Health), and Sverre Bjarte Johnsen (Statistics Norway) for assisting in transferring the data to the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and in the encryption process. Hip fracture data for validation of the NOREPOS Hip Fracture Database were obtained from local fracture registries in Tromsø and Oslo, and the authors thank the study investigators for their permission to use these data. This study was supported by a grant from the Research Council of Norway.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, et al. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009;302:1573–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsen B, Vestergaard P. Declining incidence of hip fractures and the extent of use of anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark 1997–2006. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:373–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maravic M, Taupin P, Landais P, et al. Change in hip fracture incidence over the last 6 years in France. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:797–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartholt KA, Oudshoorn C, Zielinski SM, et al. The epidemic of hip fractures: are we on the right track? PLoS One. 2011;6:e22227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams AL, Shi J, Takayanagi M, et al. Ten-year hip fracture incidence rate trends in a large California population, 1997–2006. [published online ahead of print February 21, 2012] Osteoporos Int 2012. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-1938-5.
Finsen VV. Hip fracture incidence in central Norway: a followup study. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2004;(419):173–178.Google Scholar
Bjorgul K, Reikeras O. Incidence of hip fracture in southeastern Norway: a study of 1,730 cervical and trochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2007;31:665–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoen RO, Nordsletten L, Meyer HE, et al. Hip fracture incidence is decreasing in the high incidence area of Oslo, Norway. [Published online ahead of print January 14, 2012] Osteoporos Int 2012. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1888-3.
Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 2004;35:375–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, et al. Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA. 2007;297:387–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton LJ III, Kearns AE, Atkinson EJ, et al. Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:687–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryg J, Rejnmark L, Overgaard S, et al. Hip fracture patients at risk of second hip fracture: a nationwide population-based cohort study of 169,145 cases during 1977–2001. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24:1299–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagino H, Sawaguchi T, Endo N, et al. The risk of a second hip fracture in patients after their first hip fracture. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012;90:14–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvaer K, Meyer HE, Falch JA, et al. Outdoor air pollution and bone mineral density in elderly men—the Oslo health study. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:1669–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joakimsen RM, Fonnebo V, Sogaard AJ, et al. The Tromso study: registration of fractures, how good are self-reports, a computerized radiographic register and a discharge register? Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:1001–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimai HP, Svedbom A, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, et al. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Austria: evidence for a change in the secular trend. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22:685–692.Google Scholar
De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:1330–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer HE, Tverdal A. Development of body weight in the Norwegian population. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2005;73:3–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droyvold WB, Nilsen TI, Kruger O, et al. Change in height, weight and body mass index: longitudinal data from the HUNT Study in Norway. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30:935–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar