Advertisement

European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 711–719 | Cite as

Association of fast-food restaurant and fruit and vegetable store densities with cardiovascular mortality in a metropolitan population

  • Mark DanielEmail author
  • Catherine Paquet
  • Nathalie Auger
  • Geng Zang
  • Yan Kestens
Cardiovascular disease

Abstract

Most studies that link neighbourhoods to disease outcomes have represented neighbourhoods as area-level socioeconomic status. Where objective contextual attributes of urban environments have been measured, few studies of food availability have evaluated mortality as an outcome. We sought to estimate associations between the availability of fast-food restaurants (FFR), fruit and vegetable stores (FVS), and cardiovascular mortality in an urban area. Food business data were extracted from a validated commercial database containing all businesses and services in the Montréal Census Metropolitan Area (MCMA). Mortality data (1999–2003) were obtained for the MCMA (3.4 million residents). Directly standardised mortality rates for cardiovascular deaths (n = 30,388) and non-cardiovascular deaths (all causes − cardiovascular deaths) (n = 91,132) and FFR and FVS densities (n/km2) were analysed for 845 census tracts. Generalised additive models and generalised linear models were used to analyse food source–mortality relationships. FVS density was not associated with cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular mortality (relative risk (RR) = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76, 1.36, and RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.50, respectively). Higher FFR density was associated with mortality in bivariate and multivariable analyses. Relative risks of death (95% CI) per 10% increase in FFR density were similar for both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality: 1.39 (1.19, 1.63) and 1.36 (1.18, 1.57), respectively, accounting for socio-demographic covariates. FFR density is associated with cardiovascular mortality but this relationship is no different in magnitude than that for non-cardiovascular mortality. These results together with null associations between FVS density and mortality do not support a major role for food source availability in cardiovascular outcomes.

Keywords

Epidemiologic measurements Mortality Cardiovascular disease Residence characteristics Urban health Food environments 

List of abbreviations

CI

Confidence interval

CT

Census tract

CVD

Cardiovascular disease

DSMR

Directly standardised mortality rate

FFR

Fast-food restaurant

FVS

Fruit and vegetable store

ICD

International Classification of Diseases

MCMA

Montréal Census Metropolitan Area

RR

Relative risk

SE

Standard error

SES

Socioeconomic status

SIC

Standard Industry Classification

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Karine Léger, Elisabeth Marks and Abdel Majid Mohamed. This work was funded in part by the Fondation du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Canada Foundation for Innovation (grant #201252, MD) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research through a Canada Research Chair (Population Health) to MD.

References

  1. 1.
    Diez Roux AV. Residential environments and cardiovascular risk. J Urban Health. 2003;80(4):569–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Statistics Canada. Table 102-0529—Deaths, by cause, Chapter IX: diseases of the circulatory system (I00 to I99), age group and sex, Canada, annual (number), CANSIM (database). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 2004. http://cansim2.statcan.gc.ca/cgi-win/cnsmcgi.exe?Lang=E&CANSIMFile=CII\CII_1_E.htm&RootDir=CII/. Accessed 21 December 2008.
  3. 3.
    Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;119:e1–e161.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allender S, Scarborough P, Peto V, Rayner M, Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, et al. European cardiovascular disease statistics. Brussels: European Heart Network; 2008.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tjepkema M. Nutrition: findings from the Canadian community health survey—measured obesity. Adult obesity in Canada: measured height and weight (report 82–620-MWE). Ottawa: Statistics Canada Catalogue; 2005.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diez-Roux A, Nieto FJ, Caulfield L, Tyroler HA, Watson RL, Szklo M. Neighbourhood differences in diet: the Atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(1):55–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mobley LR, Root ED, Finkelstein EA, Khavjou O, Farris RP, Will JC. Environment, obesity, and cardiovascular disease risk in low-income women. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(4):327–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sundquist J, Malmstrom M, Johansson SE. Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: a multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(5):841–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ross NA, Tremblay S, Khan S, Crouse D, Tremblay M, Berthelot J-M. Body mass index in urban Canada: neighborhood and metropolitan area effects. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(3):500–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Muntaner C, Tyroler HA, Comstock GW, Shahar E, et al. Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: a multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146(1):48–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daniel M, Kestens Y, Paquet C. Demographic and urban form correlates of healthful and unhealthful food availability in Montréal, Canada. Can J Public Health. 2009;100(3):189–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Larson NI, Story MT, Nelson MC. Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(1):74–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daniel M, Moore S, Kestens Y. Framing the biosocial pathways underlying associations between place and cardiometabolic disease. Health Place. 2008;14(2):117–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenheck R. Fast food consumption and increased caloric intake: a systematic review of a trajectory towards weight gain and obesity risk. Obes Rev. 2008;9(6):535–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maddock J. The relationship between obesity and the prevalence of fast food restaurants: state-level analysis. Am J Health Promot. 2004;19(2):137–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mehta NK, Chang VW. Weight status and restaurant availability: a multilevel analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(2):127–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moore LV, Diez Roux AV, Nettleton JA, Jacobs DR, Franco M. Fast-food consumption, diet quality, and neighborhood exposure to fast food: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(1):29–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morland K, Wing S, Diez Roux A. The contextual effect of the local food environment on residents’ diets: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(11):1761–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rose D, Richards R. Food store access and household fruit and vegetable use among participants in the US food stamp program. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:1081–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morland K, Diez Roux AV, Wing S. Supermarkets, other food stores, and obesity the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(4):333–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rundle A, Neckerman KM, Freeman L, Lovasi GS, Purciel M, Quinn J, et al. Neighborhood food environment and walkability predict obesity in New York City. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(3):442–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spence J, Cutumisu N, Edwards J, Raine K, Smoyer-Tomic K. Relation between local food environments and obesity among adults. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:192. doi: 10.1186/471-2458-9-192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anonymous. Designed for disease: the link between local food environments and obesity and diabetes. Davis, CA: California Center for Public Health Advocacy, PolicyLink, and the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2008.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giskes K, Kamphuis CB, van Lenthe FJ, Kremers S, Droomers M, Brug J. A systematic review of associations between environmental factors, energy and fat intakes among adults: is there evidence for environments that encourage obesogenic dietary intakes? Public Health Nutr. 2007;10(10):1005–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holsten JE. Obesity and the community food environment: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2008;14:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cummins S, Petticrew M, Higgins C, Findlay A, Sparks L. Large scale food retailing as an intervention for diet and health: quasi-experimental evaluation of a natural experiment. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(12):1035–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lawlor DA, Smith D. Life-course socioeconomic position, area deprivation, and coronary heart disease: findings from the British women’s heart and health study. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(1):91–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lisabeth LD, Diez Roux AV, Escobar JD, Smith MA, Morgenstern LB. Neighborhood environment and risk of ischemic stroke. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(3):279–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Diez-Roux AV, Merkin SS, Arnett D, Chambless L, Massing M, Nieto FJ, et al. Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(2):99–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sundquist K, Winkleby M, Ahlén H, Johansson SE. Neighborhood socioeconomic environment and incidence of coronary heart disease: a follow-up study of 25, 319 women and men in Sweden. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):655–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sundquist K, Malmstrom M, Johansson SE. Neighbourhood deprivation and incidence of coronary heart disease: a multilevel study of 2.6 million women and men in Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(1):71–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chaix B, Rosvall M, Merlo J. Recent increase of neighborhood socioeconomic effects on ischemic heart disease mortality: a multilevel survival analysis of two large Swedish cohorts. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(1):22–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davey Smith G, Hart C, Watt G, Hole D, Hawthorne V. Individual social class, area-based deprivation, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and mortality: the Renfrew and Paisley study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52(6):399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Marinacci C, Spadea T, Biggeri A, Demaria M, Caiazzo A, Costa G. The role of individual and contextual socioeconomic circumstances on mortality: analysis of time variations in a city of north west Italy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(3):199–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Martikainen P, Kauppinen TM, Valkonen T. Effects of the characteristics of neighbourhoods and the characteristics of people on cause specific mortality: a register based follow up study of 252 000 men. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(3):210–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Winkleby M, Sundquist K, Cubbin C. Inequities in CHD incidence and case fatality by neighborhood deprivation. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(2):97–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alter DA, Eny E. The relationship between the supply of fast-food chains and cardiovascular outcomes. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(3):173–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Morgenstern LB, Escobar JD, Sánchez BN, Hughes R, Zuniga BG, Garcia N, et al. Fast food and neighborhood stroke risk. Ann Neurol. 2009;66(2):165–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    James WP. The epidemiology of obesity: the size of the problem. J Intern Med. 2008;263(4):336–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Anderson RN, Miniño AM, Hoyert DL, Rosenberg HM. Comparability of cause of death between ICD-9 and ICD-10: preliminary estimates. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001;49(2):1–32.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tamec Inc. Zipcom Business 411 CD-ROM database. Montreal: Tamec Inc.; 2003.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Paquet C, Daniel M, Kestens Y, Léger K, Gauvin L. Field validation of listings of food stores and commercial physical activity establishments from secondary data. Int J Behav Nutr Phys. 2008;5:1–7. doi: 10.1186/479-5868-1185-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Daniel M, Kestens Y. Geographic information system: MEGAPHONE—Montreal epidemiological and geographic analysis of population health outcomes and neighbourhood effects® 1046898. Montréal: Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; 2007.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Block JP, Scribner RA, DeSalvo KB. Fast food, race/ethnicity, and income: a geographic analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(3):211–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Statistics Canada. Low income cut-offs (LICOs). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. 2001. Available at:http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/Products/Reference/dict/fam021.htm. Accessed 05-01-2007.
  46. 46.
    Moore LV, Diez Roux AV, Nettleton JA, Jacobs DR Jr. Associations of the local food environment with diet quality—a comparison of assessments based on surveys and geographic information systems: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(8):917–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Simmons D, McKenzie A, Eaton S, Cox N, Khan MA, Shaw J, et al. Choice and availability of takeaway and restaurant food is not related to the prevalence of adult obesity in rural communities in Australia. Int J Obes. 2005;29:703–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pearce J, Hiscock R, Blakely T, Witten K. The contextual effects of neighbourhood access to supermarkets and convenience stores on individual fruit and vegetable consumption. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:198–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang MC, Kim S, Gonzalez AA, Macleod KE, Winkleby MA. Socioeconomic and food-related physical characteristics of the neighbourhood environment are associated with body mass index. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(6):491–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stender S, Dyerberg J, Astrup A. Fast food: unfriendly and unhealthy. Int J Obes. 2007;31:887–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bowman SA, Vinyard BT. Fast food consumption of US adults: impact on energy and nutrient intakes and overweight status. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23(2):163–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Satia JA, Galanko JA, Siega-Riz AM. Eating at fast-food restaurants is associated with dietary intake, demographic, psychosocial and behavioural factors among African Americans in North Carolina. Public Health Nutr. 2007;7(8):1089–96.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    French SA, Harnack L, Jeffrey RW. Fast food restaurant use among women in the pound of prevention study: dietary, behavioral and demographic correlates. Int J Obes. 2000;24:1353–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Prentice AM, Jebb SA. Fast foods, energy density and obesity: a possible mechanistic link. Obes Rev. 2003;4(4):187–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Levine AS, Kotz CM, Gosnell BA. Sugars and fats: the neurobiology of preference. J Nutr. 2003;133(Suppl):831–4.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jabs J, Devine CM. Time scarcity and food choices: an overview. Appetite. 2006;47(2):196–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Li F, Harmer P, Cardinal BJ, Bosworth M, Johnson-Shelton D, Moore JM, et al. Built environment and 1-year change in weight and waist circumference in middle-aged and older adults: Portland neighborhood environment and health study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(4):401–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    McKinnon RA, Reedy J, Morrissette MA, Lytle LA, Yaroch AL. Measures of the food environment. A compilation of the literature, 1990–2007. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(4 Suppl):S124–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mujahid MS, Diez-Roux AV, Shen M, Gowda D, Sanchez B, Shea S, et al. Relation between neighborhood environments and obesity in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(11):1349–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Daniel
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Catherine Paquet
    • 1
  • Nathalie Auger
    • 3
    • 4
  • Geng Zang
    • 3
  • Yan Kestens
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Sansom Institute for Health ResearchThe University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, St Vincent’s HospitalThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMontréalCanada
  4. 4.Institut national de santé publique du QuébecMontréalCanada
  5. 5.Secteur environnement urbain et santéDirection de santé publique de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations