Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
- 12k Downloads
KeywordsUveal Melanoma Cohort Member Nurse Health Study Quality Item Response Proportion
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
I am very grateful for many helpful comments by an anonymous reviewer on an earlier version of this manuscript.
- 3.Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7(27):iii–173.Google Scholar
- 5.Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available from: URL: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm [cited 2009 Oct 19].
- 8.Miettinen OS. Theoretical epidemiology. Principles of occurrence research in medicine. Albany, New York: Delmar Publishers Inc; 1985.Google Scholar
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010