Convergence of body mass index of immigrants to the Canadian-born population: evidence from the National Population Health Survey (1994–2006)

  • Maninder Singh Setia
  • Amelie Quesnel-Vallee
  • Michal Abrahamowicz
  • Pierre Tousignant
  • John Lynch
OBESITY

Abstract

Recent immigrants typically have better physical health than the native born population. However, this ‘healthy immigrant effect’ tends to gradually wane over time, with increasing length of residence in the host country. To assess whether the body mass index (BMI) of different immigrant groups converged to the Canadian population’s levels, we estimated 12-year trajectories of changes in BMI (accounting for socio-demographic changes). Using data from seven longitudinal waves of the National Population Health Survey (1994 through 2006), we compared the changes in BMI (kg/m2) among three groups: white immigrants, non-white immigrants and Canadian born, aged 18–54 at baseline. We applied linear random effects models to evaluate these BMI separately in 2,504 males and 2,960 females. BMI increased in Canadian born, white immigrants, and non-white immigrants over the 12-year period. However, non-white immigrants (males and females) had a lower mean BMI than Canadian born individuals during this period [Males: −2.27, 95% Confidence interval (CI) −3.02 to −1.53; Females: −1.84, 95% CI −2.79 to −0.90]. In contrast, the mean BMI in white male immigrants and Canadian born individuals were similar (−0.32, 95% CI −0.91 to 0.27). Even after adjusting for time since immigration, non-white immigrants had lower BMI than white immigrants. White male immigrants were the only sub-group to converge to the BMI of the Canadian born population. These results indicate that the loss of ‘healthy immigrant effect’ with regard to convergence of BMI to Canadian levels may not be experienced equally by all immigrants in Canada.

Keywords

Body mass index Immigrants Convergence Longitudinal evidence 

References

  1. 1.
    Facts and figures: immigration overview permanent and temporary residents. Ottawa: Citizenship and Immigration Canada; 2006. p. 1–114.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Migration in interconnected world: new directions for action. Switzerland: Global Commission on International Migration. 2005. http://www.gcim.org/attachements/gcim-complete-report-2005.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2009.
  3. 3.
    Chen J, Ng E, Wilkins R. The health of Canada’s immigrants in 1994–95. Health Rep. 1996; 7(4):33–45, 37–50.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deri C. Understanding the ‘Health Immigrant Effect’ in Canada, in Working Papers. Department of Economics, University of Ottawa. 2004. (Working Paper # 0502E). http://www.sciencessociales.uottawa.ca/eco/pdf/cahiers/0502E.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2009.
  5. 5.
    Antecol H, Bedard K. Unhealthy assimilation: why do immigrants converge to American health status levels? Demography. 2006;43(2):337–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strong K, Trickett P, Bhatia K. The health of overseas-born Australians, 1994–1996. Aust Health Rev. 1998;21(2):124–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gee EM, Kobayashi KM, Prus SG. Examining the healthy immigrant effect in mid- to later life: findings from the Canadian Community Health Survey. Can J Aging. 2004;23(Suppl 1):S61–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beiser M, et al. Poverty, family process, and the mental health of immigrant children in Canada. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(2):220–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeVoretz D, editor. Diminishing returns: the economics of Canada’s recent immigration policy. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute; 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duleep HO, Dowhan DJ. Research on immigrant earnings. Soc Secur Bull. 2008;68(1):31–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bethel JW, Schenker MB. Acculturation and smoking patterns among Hispanics: a review. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(2):143–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Varghese S, Moore-Orr R. Dietary acculturation and health-related issues of Indian immigrant families in Newfoundland. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2002;63(2):72–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zemore SE. Acculturation and alcohol among Latino adults in the United States: a comprehensive review. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(12):1968–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beiser M. The health of immigrants and refugees in Canada. Can J Public Health. 2005;96(Suppl 2):S30–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gordon-Larsen P, et al. Acculturation and overweight-related behaviors among Hispanic immigrants to the US: the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2023–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fuentes-Afflick E, Hessol NA. Acculturation and body mass among Latina women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008;17(1):67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaplan MS, et al. The association between length of residence and obesity among Hispanic immigrants. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(4):323–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bray GA. Medical consequences of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):2583–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cairney J, Ostbye T. Time since immigration and excess body weight. Can J Public Health. 1999;90(2):120–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McDonald JT, Kennedy S. Is migration to Canada associated with unhealthy weight gain? Overweight and obesity among Canada’s immigrants. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(12):2469–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tremblay MS, et al. Obesity, overweight and ethnicity. Health Rep. 2005;16(4):23–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004; 363(9403):157–63.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, Guricci S. Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship. Obes Rev. 2002;3(3):141–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tremblay MS, et al. Physical activity and immigrant status: evidence from the Canadian Community Health Survey. Can J Public Health. 2006;97(4):277–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Berry J. Immigration acculturation and adaptation. Appl Psychol: Int Rev. 1997;46:5–33.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage; 2004. p. 1–266.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974;19(6):716–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van Buuren S, Boshuizen HC, Knook DL. Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Stat Med. 1999;18(6):681–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Buuren S, Oudshoorn K (1999) Flexible multivariate imputation by MICE (TNO report PG/VGZ/99.054). Volume, 3–19 http://www.multiple-imputation.com/. Accessed 15 Feb 2009.
  31. 31.
    Carlin J, Galati J, Royston P. A new framework for managing and analyzing multiply imputed data in Stata. Stata J. 2008;8(1):49–67.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: update. Stata J. 2005;5(2):188–201.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values: update of ice. Stata J. 2005;5(4):527–36.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ross NA, et al. Body mass index in urban Canada: neighborhood and metropolitan area effects. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(3):500–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Satia-Abouta J, et al. Dietary acculturation: applications to nutrition research and dietetics. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(8):1105–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goel MS, et al. Obesity among US immigrant subgroups by duration of residence. JAMA. 2004;292(23):2860–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kumar BN, et al. Ethnic differences in body mass index and associated factors of adolescents from minorities in Oslo, Norway: a cross-sectional study. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7(8):999–1008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rush E, et al. Body size, body composition, and fat distribution: a comparison of young New Zealand men of European, Pacific Island, and Asian Indian ethnicities. N Z Med J. 2004;117(1207):U1203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Snijder MB, et al. What aspects of body fat are particularly hazardous and how do we measure them? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(1):83–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gorber SC. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2007;8(4):307–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Whitlock G, et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1083–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maninder Singh Setia
    • 1
  • Amelie Quesnel-Vallee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michal Abrahamowicz
    • 1
  • Pierre Tousignant
    • 1
  • John Lynch
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational HealthMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of SociologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.School of Health SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations