The risk for multifactorial diseases is determined by risk factors that frequently apply across disorders (universal risk factors). To investigate unresolved issues on etiology of and individual’s susceptibility to multifactorial diseases, research focus should shift from single determinant-outcome relations to effect modification of universal risk factors. We present a model to investigate universal risk factors of multifactorial diseases, based on a single risk factor, a single outcome measure, and several effect modifiers. Outcome measures can be disease overriding, such as clustering of disease, frailty and quality of life. “Life course epidemiology” can be considered as a specific application of the proposed model, since risk factors and effect modifiers of multifactorial diseases typically have a chronic aspect. Risk factors are categorized into genetic, environmental, or complex factors, the latter resulting from interactions between (multiple) genetic and environmental factors (an example of a complex factor is overweight). The proposed research model of multifactorial diseases assumes that determinant-outcome relations differ between individuals because of modifiers, which can be divided into three categories. First, risk-factor modifiers that determine the effect of the determinant (such as factors that modify gene-expression in case of a genetic determinant). Second, outcome modifiers that determine the expression of the studied outcome (such as medication use). Third, generic modifiers that determine the susceptibility for multifactorial diseases (such as age). A study to assess disease risk during life requires phenotype and outcome measurements in multiple generations with a long-term follow up. Multiple generations will also enable to separate genetic and environmental factors. Traditionally, representative individuals (probands) and their first-degree relatives have been included in this type of research. We put forward that a three-generation design is the optimal approach to investigate multifactorial diseases. This design has statistical advantages (precision, multiple-informants, separation of non-genetic and genetic familial transmission, direct haplotype assessment, quantify genetic effects), enables unique possibilities to study social characteristics (socioeconomic mobility, partner preferences, between-generation similarities), and offers practical benefits (efficiency, lower non-response). LifeLines is a study based on these concepts. It will be carried out in a representative sample of 165,000 participants from the northern provinces of the Netherlands. LifeLines will contribute to the understanding of how universal risk factors are modified to influence the individual susceptibility to multifactorial diseases, not only at one stage of life but cumulatively over time: the lifeline.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We thank Prof. J.A. Neeleman for his valuable contribution to the development of some ideas presented in this paper. RS was primarily responsible for designing, initiating, drafting of the manuscript. JR participated in the writing of the paper. All authors participated in essential discussions on the concepts and critically reviewed the manuscript.
The LifeLines project is funded by several public sources (University Medical Center Groningen, University and city of Groningen, Northern Dutch region) who were not involved in the preparation of this paper.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
World Health Organisation. World Health Report 2002; Reducing risk, promoting healthy life. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2002.Google Scholar
De Stavola BL, Nitsch D, dos Santos Silva I, et al. Statistical issues in life course epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:84–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker DJ, Eriksson JG, Forsen T, et al. Fetal origins of adult disease: strength of effects and biological basis. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:1235–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaher C, Halbert R, Dubois R, et al. Smoking-related diseases: the importance of COPD. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8:1423–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Baron JA. Beneficial effects of nicotine and cigarette smoking: the real, the possible and the spurious. Br Med Bull. 1996;52:58–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. Am J Public Health 2005;95 Suppl 1:S144–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelada SN, Eaton DL, Wang SS, et al. The role of genetic polymorphisms in environmental health. Environ Health Perspect. 2003;111:1055–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Aneshensel CS, Frerichs RR, Huba GJ. Depression and physical illness: a multiwave, nonrecursive causal model. J Health Soc Behav. 1984;25:350–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotopf M, Mayou R, Wadsworth M, et al. Temporal relationships between physical symptoms and psychiatric disorder - Results from a national birth cohort. Br J Psychiatry 1998;173:255–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Stansfeld SA, Smith GD, Marmot M. Association between physical and psychological morbidity in the Whitehall II Study. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37:227–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cynader MS. Mechanisms of brain-development and their role in health and well-being. Daedalus 1994;123:155–65.Google Scholar
Plagemann A. Fetal programming and functional teratogenesis: on epigenetic mechanisms and prevention of perinatally acquired lasting health risks. J Perinat Med. 2004;32:297–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power C, Hertzman C. Social and biological pathways linking early life and adult disease. Br Med Bull. 1997;53:210–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Russo C, Polosa R. TNF-alpha as a promising therapeutic target in chronic asthma: a lesson from rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Sci (Lond). 2005;109:135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira MA, Kartashov AI, Ebbeling CB, et al. Fast-food habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective analysis. Lancet 2005;365:36–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176:532–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant C. Life events, stress and depression: a review of recent findings. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2002;36:173–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormel J, Oldehinkel AJ, Brilman EI. The interplay and etiological continuity of neuroticism, difficulties, and life events in the etiology of major and subsyndromal, first and recurrent depressive episodes in later life. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:885–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein P, Pedersen NL. Does genetic variance for cognitive abilities account for genetic variance in educational achievement and occupational status? A study of twins reared apart and twins reared together. Soc Biol. 1997;44:77–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kessler RC, Foster CL, Saunders WB, et al. Social consequences of psychiatric disorders, I: educational attainment. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:1026–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, et al. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:10604–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinstein AR. The pre-therapeutic classification of comorbidity in chronic disease. J Chronic Dis. 1970;23:455–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Knottnerus JA. Comorbidity or multimorbidity; what’s in a name? A review of the literature. Eur J Gen Pract. 1996;2:65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Akker M, Buntinx F, Metsemakers JFM, et al. Multimorbidity in general practice: prevalence, incidence, and determinants of co-occurring chronic and recurrent diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:367–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guralnik JM, Kaplan GA. Predictors of healthy aging: prospective evidence from the Alameda County study. Am J Public Health 1989;79:703–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von KM, Wagner EH, Saunders K. A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, et al. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:255–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ormel J, Vonkorff M, Ustun TB, et al. Common mental disorders and disability across cultures. Results from the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care. JAMA 1994;272:1741–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf) 2005;27:281–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Studenski S, et al. Designing randomized, controlled trials aimed at preventing or delaying functional decline and disability in frail, older persons: a consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:625–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockwood K, Howlett SE, MacKnight C, et al. Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: report from the Canadian study of health and aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:1310–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Boxenbaum H. Gompertz mortality analysis: aging, longevity hormesis and toxicity. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1991;13:125–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quantitative Genetic Theory. In: Plomin R, De Fries JC, McClearn GE, et al., editors. Behavioral genetics. A primer.4th ed. New York: Freeman & co; 2000. p. 207–254.Google Scholar
Luo S, Klohnen EC. Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: a couple-centered approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;88:304–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Roodi N, et al. Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:138–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar