European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 839–847 | Cite as

Determinants of Response in a Longitudinal Health Study Following the Firework-disaster in Enschede, The Netherlands

  • Marieke B.A. Dijkema
  • Linda Grievink
  • Rebecca K. Stellato
  • Jan Roorda
  • Peter G. van der Velden


Very few longitudinal health studies after disasters published data on the determinants of loss to follow up. However, these determinants provide important information for future disaster studies to improve their response and reduce selection bias. For this purpose we analyzed the data of a longitudinal health survey which was performed among residents and emergency workers, at 3 weeks (n = 3662) and at 18 months (n = 2769) after a major firework disaster in The Netherlands (Enschede, May 13, 2000). The response was lower among immigrants (54%) than among native Dutch (81%). Severe damage to the house due to the disaster (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1–3.0) and being involved as an emergency workers (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2–3.4) were associated with higher response among native Dutch, while this was not the case among immigrants. Non-western immigrants with health problems in the first study were more likely to participate in the second study (for example physical symptoms OR: 2.5: 95% CI: 1.4–4.4), while the native Dutch with these symptoms were less likely to participate (OR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5–0.9). In conclusion, disaster-related characteristics were associated with higher response in native Dutch. Health problems were associated with higher response among non-western immigrants and with lower response among the native Dutch.


Attrition Determinants Disasters Longitudinal studies Public health 



confidence interval


impact of event questionnaire (15 items)


odds ratio


adjusted odds ratio


posttraumatic stress disorder


questionnaire on general health (36 items)


symptom check list (90 items)


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Green, BL, Lindy, JD, Grace, MC,  et al. 1990Buffalo creek survivors in the second decade: Stability of stress symptomsAm J Orthopsychiat604354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norris, FH, Friedman, MJ, Watson, PJ, Byrne, CM, Diaz, E, Kaniasty, K 200260,000 Disaster victims speak: Part I. An emperical review of the empirical literature-1981–2001Psychiatry65207239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norris, FH, Friedman, MJ, Watson, PJ 200260,000 Disaster victims speak: Part II. Summary and implications of the disaster mental health researchPsychiatry65240260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roorda, J, Stiphout, WA, Huijsman-Rubingh, RR 2004Post-disaster health effects: Strategies for investigation and data-collection; experiences from the Firework disasterJ Epidemiol Community Health58982987CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Graaf, R, Bijl, RV, Smit, F, Ravelli, A, Vollebergh, WAM 2000Psychiatric and sociodemographic predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study: The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS)Am J Epidemiol15210391047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Korkeila, K, Suominen, S, Ahvenainen, J,  et al. 2001Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health surveyEur J Epidemiol17991999CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Psaty, BM, Cheadle, A, Koepsell, TD,  et al. 1994Race- and ethnicity-specific characteristics of participants lost to follow-up in a telephone cohortAm J Epidemiol140161171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berg, B, Grievink, L, Yzermans, J, Lebrel, E 2005Medically unexplained physical symptoms in the aftermath of disasters: A systematic reviewEpidemiol Rev2792106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ginexi, EM, Weihs, K, Simmens, SY, Hoyt, DR 2000Natural disaster and depression: A prospective investigation of reactions to the 1993 Midwest FloodsAm J Commun Psychol28495518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dougall, AL, Heberman, HB, Delahanty, SS, Inslicht, DL, Baum, A 2000Similarity of prior trauma exposure as a determinant of chronic stress responding to an airline disasterJ Consult Clin Psychol68290295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norris, FH, Perilla, JL, Riad, RK, Kaniasty, K, Lavizzo, EA 1999Stability and change in stress, resources, and psychological distress following natural disaster: Findings from Hurricane AndrewAnxiety, Stress and Coping12363396Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phifer, P, Norris, F 1989Psychological symptoms in older adults following natural disasters: Nature, timing, duration, and courseJ Gerontology44207217Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carr, VJ, Lewin, TJ, Webster, RA, Kenardy, JA, Hazell, PL, Carter, GL 1997Psychosocial sequelae of the 1989 Newcastle earthquake: II. Exposure and morbidity profiles during the first 2 years post-disasterPsychol Med27167178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Epstein, RS, Fullerton, CS, Urasano, RJ 1998Posttraumatic stress disorder following an air disaster: A prospective studyAm J Psychiatry155934938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen Silver, R, Holman, EA, McInstosh, DN, Poulin, M, Gil-Rivas, V 2002Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11JAMA28812351244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dalgleish, T, Joseph, S, Thrasher, S, Tranah, T, Yule, W 1996Crisis support following the Herald of free-enterprise disaster: A longitudinal perspectiveJ. Trauma Stress9833845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    North, CS, McCutcheon, V, Spitznagel, EL, Smith, EM 2002Three-year follow-up of survivors of a mass shooting episodeJ Urban Health79383391PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Powell, CA, Penick, EC 1983Psychological distress following a natural disaster: A one-year follow-up of 98 flood victimsJ Commun Psychol11269276Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weisaeth, L 1989Importance of high response rates in traumatic stress researchActa Psychiatr Scand80131137Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Benight, CC, Ironson, G, Klebe, K,  et al. 1999Conservation of resources and coping self-efficacy predicting distress following a natural disaster: A causal model analysis where the environment meets the mindAnxiety, Stress, and Coping12107126Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reijneveld, SA, Crone, MR, Verhulst, FC, Verloove-Vanhorick, SP 2003The effect of a severe disaster on the mental health of adolescents: A controlled studyLancet362691696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marmar, CR, Weiss, DS, Metzler, TJ, Delucchi, KL, Best, SR, Wentworth, KA 1999Longitudinal course and predictors of continuing distress following critical incident exposure in emergency services personnelJ Nerv Ment Dis1871522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    RIVM Projectteam. Firework disaster Enschede: Components in blood and urine (Dutch report). Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 2001 (report no 630930 003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Kamp I, van der Velden PG. Firework Disaster Enschede: Physical and mental health and experiences of the disaster (report in Dutch). Bilthoven/Zaltbommel, The Netherlands: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)/Institute for Psychotrauma (IVP), 2001 (report no RIVM 630930002 and IVP 9920012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van der Velden PG, Grievink L, Dusseldorp A, et al. Health status of the survivors of the Firework Disaster Enschede; report of a health survey 18 months after the disaster (report in Dutch) Zalbommel/Biltthoven, The Netherlands: Institute for Psychotrauma/National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 2002 (report no IVP 99 20023 and RIVM 630930004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    van der Zee KI, Sanderman R. Het Meten van de Algemene Gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36. [Measuring general health with the RAND-36: A manual]. Groningen: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken, 1993Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ware, JE,Jr, Sherbourne, CD 1992The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selectionMed Care30473483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aaronson, NK, Muller, M, Cohen, PD,  et al. 1998Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populationsJ Clin Epidemiol5110551068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Arrindel, WA, Ettema, JHM 1986 SCL-90. Handleiding Bij Een Multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator. (in Dutch)Swets & ZeitlingerLisseGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ploeg, E, Mooren, TT, Kleber, PG, van der Velden, RJ, Brom, D 2004The Dutch impact of event scale. Construct validation of the Dutch version of the impact of event scalePsychol Asses161626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Horowitz, M, Wilner, N, Alvarez, W 1979Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stressPsychosom Med41209218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Velden, PG, Burg, S, Steinmetz, CHD, Bout, J 1992Victims of bankrobberies (in Dutch)Bohn Stafleu Van LoghemHoutenGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jansen, ME, Sikkel, D 1981Abridged versions of the VOEG-scale (in Dutch)Gezondheid en Samenleving27882Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zunzunegui, MV, Beland, F, Guttierrez-Cuadra, P 2001Loss to follow-up in a longitudinal study on aging in SpainJ Clin Epidemiol54501510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Parker, C, Dewey, M 2000Assessing research outcomes by postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up. TOTAL Study Group. Trial of Occupational Therapy and LeisureInt J Epidemiol2910651069CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dengler, R, Roberts, H, Rushton, L 1997Lifestyle surveys–the complete answer?J Epidemiol Commun Health514651Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Helasoja, V, Prattala, R, Dregval, L, Pudule, I, Kasmel, A 2002Late response and item nonresponse in the Finbalt Health Monitor surveyEur J Public Health12117123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rubin, DB 1996Multiple imputation after 18+ yearsJ Am Stat Assoc91473489Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marieke B.A. Dijkema
    • 1
    • 2
  • Linda Grievink
    • 1
  • Rebecca K. Stellato
    • 1
  • Jan Roorda
    • 3
  • Peter G. van der Velden
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Environmental Health Research (MGO) (Pb 10)National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)3720, Bilthoven, BAThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Regional Health Authority Amstelland – de MeerlandenAmstelveenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Regional Health Authority TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Institute for Psychotrauma (IvP)ZaltbommelThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations