European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 19, Issue 10, pp 979–985 | Cite as

Choosing immunisation coverage indicators at the local level

  • Paolo Giorgi Rossi
  • Annunziata Faustini
  • Teresa Spadea
  • Carlo A. Perucci
Infectious Diseases


Background: The reliability of information sources, as well as the precision of coverage indicators are open questions for immunisation coverage surveys. Methods: A sample survey of 323 children from two birth cohorts (1991–1992 and 1979–1981) was done. The sample was selected from seven health districts out of 51 in the Lazio region. The information was collected from vaccination cards or from parents, using a mail-in questionnaire. We computed three indicators of coverage at 24 months of age for polio, diphtheria–tetanus, pertussis (P), hepatitis B, and measles (M), depending on the value given to parental recall. We also compared up-to-date (UTD) (immunised children at 24 months) and age-appropriate (months at risk per child) indicators at the local level. Results: Response rate was 68.2%. The two birth cohorts were similarly immunised for polio (coverage 95%); the younger cohort had higher coverage levels for diphtheria–tetanus (93% vs. 75%), for P (30% vs. 22%), for M (43% vs. 16%) than the older one, even on the basis of parental recall. In the older cohort, diphtheria–tetanus, P and M coverage levels were 75, 22 and 15%, respectively, on the basis of parental recall and 66, 17 and 4% on certification. The age-appropriate indicator revealed four districts that completed vaccinations significantly too late, while the UTD indicator showed only one district significantly below the threshold of 95% of immunized children at 24 months. Conclusions: Parental recall and data from cards are comparable sources, but the former is more sensitive than the latter in retrospective studies. Verbal recall should be accepted as reasonably reliable in the absence of cards. Age-appropriate indicators give a more complete evaluation of the susceptibility in the population, and are more precise at the local level.


Age-appropriate indicators Immunisation coverage Parental recall Up-to-date indicators 



Centers for Diseases Control


confidence intervals


diphtheria vaccine and tetanus toxoid


hepatitis B vaccine




oral polio vaccine






up-to-date vaccinations at 24 months


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bobo, JK, Gale, JL, Thapa, PB, Wassillak, SGF 1993Risk factors for delayed immunization in a random sample of 1163 children from Oregon and WashingtonPediatrics91308314Google Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control. National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19--35 months -- United States, 1999. MMWR 2000; 49: 585--589Google Scholar
  3. Daley, DJ, Gani, J 1999Epidemic modelling.Cambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control. Vaccination coverage of 2-year-old children. United States, 1991--92. MMWR 1994; 42: 985--987Google Scholar
  5. Centers for Disease Control. National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19--35 months -- United States, July 1994--June 1995. MMWR 1996; 45: 508--513Google Scholar
  6. Lemeshow, S, Robinson, D 1985Surveys to measure programme coverage and impact: A review of the methodology used by the expanded programme on immunization.World Health Stat Q,386575Google Scholar
  7. Weeks, RM, Svetlana, F, Noorgoul, S, Valentina, G 2000Improving the monitoring of immunization services in Kyrgyzstan.Health Policy Plan15279286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolton, P, Hussain, A, Hadpawat, A, Holt, E, Hughart, N, Guyer, B 1998Deficiencies in current childhood immunization indicators.Pub Health Rep113527532Google Scholar
  9. Ross, A, Kennedy, AB, Holt, E, Guyer, B, Hou, W, Hughart, N 1998Initiating the first DTP vaccination age-appropriately: A model for understanding vaccination coverage.Pediatrics101970974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guyer, B, Hughart, N, Holt, E,  et al. 1994Immunization coverage and its relationship to preventive health care visits among Inner-City children in Baltimore.Pediatrics945358Google Scholar
  11. Zell, ER, Dietz, V, Stevenson, J, Cochi, S, Bruce, RH 1994Low vaccination levels of US pre-school and school-age children.JAMA271833839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gindler, JS, Cutts, FT, Barnett-Antinori, ME,  et al. 1993Successes and failures in vaccine delivery: evaluation of the immunization delivery system in Puerto Rico91315320Google Scholar
  13. Bolton, P, Holt, E, Ross, A, Hughart, N, Guyer, B 1998Estimating vaccination coverage using parental recall, vaccination cards and medical records.Pub Health Rep113521526Google Scholar
  14. Goldstein, KP, Kviz, FJ, Daum, RS 1993Accuracy of immunization histories provided by adults accompanying pre-school children to a paediatric emergency departmentJAMA27021902194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pless, CE, Pless, IB 1995How well they rememberArch Pediat Adol Med149553558Google Scholar
  16. Goldman, N, Pebley, AR 1994Health cards, maternal reports and the measurement of immunization coverage: The example of GuatemalaSoc Sci Med3810751089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faustini, A, Spadea, T, Fano, V,  et al. 2001Factors associated with Hepatitis B virus immunization coverage at the beginning of a population Campaign in the Lazio Region, ItalyPrev Med33409414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Intercooled Stata 6.0 for Windows 95/98/NT [software package]. Release 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 1999Google Scholar
  19. Fielding, JE, Cumberland, G, Pettitt, L 1994Immunization status of children of employees in a large corporation.JAMA271525530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. The Italian Vaccine Coverage Survey Working Group1994Childhood vaccination coverage in Italy: Results of a seven-region surveyBull WHO72885895Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Giorgi Rossi
    • 1
    • 4
  • Annunziata Faustini
    • 2
  • Teresa Spadea
    • 3
  • Carlo A. Perucci
    • 1
  1. 1.Agency for Public Health Lazio RegionRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyASL Roma ERomeItaly
  3. 3.Epidemiology UnitPiedmont Region, ASL 5Grugliasco (TO)Italy
  4. 4.ASPItaly

Personalised recommendations