Low-cost field production of biochars and their properties

  • Liang Xiao
  • Lirong Feng
  • Guodong YuanEmail author
  • Jing Wei
Original Paper


Biochar has been intensively investigated for carbon sequestration, soil fertility enhancement, and immobilization of heavy metals and organic pollutants. Large-scale use of biochar in agricultural production and environmental remediation, however, has been constrained by its high cost. Here, we demonstrated the production of low-cost biochar ($20/ton) in the field from Robinia pseudoacacia biowaste via a combined aerobic and oxygen-limited carbonization process and a fire-water-coupled method. It involved aerobic combustion at the outer side of biomass, oxygen-limited pyrolysis in the inner core of biomass, and the termination of the carbonization by water spray. The properties of biochar thus produced were greatly affected by exposure time (the gap between a burning char fell to the ground and being extinguished by water spray). Biochar formed by zero exposure time showed a larger specific surface area (155.77 m2/g), a higher carbon content (67.45%), a lower ash content (15.38%), and a higher content of carboxyl and phenolic-hydroxyl groups (1.74 and 0.86 mol/kg, respectively) than biochars formed with longer exposure times (5–30 min). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic (FTIR) spectra indicated that oxygen-containing functional groups of biochar played a role in Cd and oxytetracycline sorption though a quantitative relationship could not be established as the relative contribution of carbon and ash moieties of biochar to the sorption was unknown. Outcomes from this research provide an option for inexpensive production of biochar to support its use as a soil amendment in developing countries.


Biowaste Exposure times Functional groups Cadmium Oxytetracycline 



This work was supported by grants from the Chinese National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFD0200303), Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2016CYJS05A01), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41501522). Mr. Guanhua Shen of Zhaoqing University is appreciated for analyzing the specific surface area of biochar. We are grateful to Anne Austin, Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research, New Zealand, for editing the original manuscript, and to three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.


  1. Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., et al. (2014). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere,99(3), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, M. B., Zhou, J. L., Ngo, H. H., & Guo, W. S. (2015). Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater: progress and challenges. Science of the Total Environment,532, 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, M. B., Zhou, J. L., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W. S., & Chen, M. F. (2016). Progress in the preparation and application of modified biochar for improved contaminant removal from water and wastewater. Bioresource Technology,214, 836–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed, M. B., Zhou, J. L., Ngo, H. H., Guo, W. S., Johir, M. A. H., & Sornalingam, K. (2017). Single and competitive sorption properties and mechanism of functionalized biochar for removing sulfonamide antibiotics from water. Chemical Engineering Journal,311(1), 348–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Wabel, M. I., Hussain, Q., Usman, A. R. A., Ahmad, M., Abduljabbar, A., Sallam, A. S., et al. (2018). Impact of biochar properties on soil conditions and agricultural sustainability: a review. Land Degradation & Development, 29(7), 2124–2161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Wabel, M. I., Usman, A. R., Al-Farraj, A. S., Ok, Y. S., Abduljabbar, A., Al-Faraj, A. I., et al. (2019). Date palm waste biochars alter a soil respiration, microbial biomass carbon, and heavy metal mobility in contaminated mined soil. Environmental Geochemistry and Health41(4), 1705–1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antal, M. J., & Gronli, M. (2003). The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research,42(8), 1619–1640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bao, S. D. (2000). Soil agrochemical analysis (pp. 258–260). Beijing: China Agriculture Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blackwell, P., Reithmuller, G., & Collins, M. (2009). Biochar application to soil. In J. Lehmann & S. Joseph (Eds.), Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology (pp. 207–226). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, R. M., Anderson, N. M., Daugaard, D. E., & Naughton, H. T. (2018). Financial viability of biofuel and biochar production from forest biomass in the face of market price volatility and uncertainty. Applied Energy,230, 330–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chagger, H. K., Kendall, A., McDonald, A., Pourkashanian, M., & Williams, A. (1998). Formation of dioxins and other semi-volatile organic compounds in biomass combustion. Applied Energy,60(2), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, B. L., Zhou, D. D., & Zhu, L. Z. (2008). Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochar of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environmental Science and Technology,42(14), 5137–5143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crombie, K., Mašek, O., Sohi, S. P., Brownsort, P., & Cross, A. (2013). The effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar stability as determined by three methods. Global Change Biology Bioenergy,5(2), 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dai, Z. M., Zhang, X., Tang, C., Muhammad, N., Wu, J. J., Brookes, P. C., et al. (2017). Potential role of biochar in decreasing soil acidification A critical review. Science of the Total Environment,581–582, 601–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dai, Y. J., Zhang, N. X., Xing, C. M., Cui, Q. X., & Sun, Q. Y. (2019). The adsorption, regeneration and engineering applications of biochar for removal organic pollutants: A review. Chemosphere,223, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fu, B. M., Ge, C. J., Yue, L., Luo, J. W., Feng, D., Deng, H., et al. (2016). Characterization of biochar derived from pineapple peel waste and its application for adsorption of oxytetracycline from aqueous solution. BioResources,11(4), 9017–9035.Google Scholar
  17. Galinato, S., Yoder, J., & Granatstein, D. (2011). The economic value of biochar in crop production and carbon sequestration. Energy Policy,39, 6344–6350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Genuino, D. A., De Luna, M. D., & Capareda, S. C. (2018). Improving the surface properties of municipal solid waste-derived pyrolysis biochar by chemical and thermal activation: optimization of process parameters and environmental application. Waste Management,72, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W. (2002). Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal-a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils,35(4), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamelinck, C. N., Hooijdonk, G. V., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2005). Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term. Biomass and Bioenergy,28(4), 384–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harder, B. (2006). Smoldered-earth policy: Created by ancient Amazonian natives, fertile, dark soils retain abundant carbon. Science,169(9), 133.Google Scholar
  22. Hass, A. & Lima, I. M. (2018). Effect of feed source and pyrolysis conditions on properties and metal sorption by sugarcane biochar. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 10, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Houben, D., Evrard, L., & Sonnet, P. (2013). Beneficial effects of biochar application to contaminated soils on the bioavailability of Cd, Pb and Zn and the biomass production of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Biomass and Bioenergy,57(11), 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, Y., Anderson, M., Lyons, G. A., McRoberts, W. C., Wang, Y. D., McIlveen-Wright, D. R., et al. (2014). Techno-economic analysis of biochar production and energy generation from poultry litter waste. Energy Procedia,61, 714–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. International Humic Substances Society (IHSS). Accessed on 12 February 2019.
  26. Inyang, M. I., Gao, B., Yao, Y., Xue, Y. W., Zimmerman, A., Mosa, A., et al. (2016). A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal removal. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology,46(4), 406–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ji, L. L., Wan, Y. Q., Zheng, S. R., & Zhu, D. Q. (2011). Adsorption of tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole on crop residue-derived ashes: Implication for the relative importance of black carbon to soil sorption. Environmental Science and Technology,45(13), 5580–5586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Joseph, S., Peacocke, C., Lehmann, J., & Munroe, P. (2009). Developing a biochar classification system and test methods. In J. Lehmann & S. Joseph (Eds.), Biochar for environmental management (pp. 107–126). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  29. Keiluweit, M., Nico, P., Johnson, M. G., & Kleber, M. (2010). Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (Biochar). Environmental Science and Technology,44(4), 1247–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kookana, R. S., Sarmah, A. K., Zwieten, L. V., Krull, E., & Singh, B. (2011). Biochar application to soil: agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences. Advances in Agronomy,112, 103–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehmann, J. (2007). A handful of carbon. Nature,447(7141), 143–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manyà, J. J. (2012). Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: A review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs. Environmental Science and Technology,46, 7939–7954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marousěk, J., Vochozka, M., Plachý, J., & Źák, J. (2017). Glory and misery of biochar. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,19, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marris, E. (2006). Putting the carbon back: Black is the new green. Nature,442(7103), 624–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oliveira, F. R., Patel, A. K., Jaisi, D. P., Adhikari, S., Lu, H., & Khanal, S. K. (2017). Environmental application of biochar: Current status and perspectives. Bioresource Technology,246, 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saifullah, Dahlawi, S., Naeem, A., Rengel, Z., & Naidu, R. (2018). Biochar application for the remediation of salt-affected soils: Challenges and opportunities. Science of the Total Environment625, 320–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shabangu, S., Woolf, D., Fisher, E. M., Angenent, L. T., & Lehmann, J. (2014). Techno-economic assessment of biomass slow pyrolysis into different biochar and methanol concepts. Fuel,117, 742–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shackley, S., Hammond, J., Gaunt, J., & Ibarrola, R. (2011). The feasibility and costs of biochar deployment in the UK. Carbon Management,2(3), 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shafizadeh, F. (1982). Introduction to pyrolysis of biomass. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis,3, 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Singh, A., & Prasad, S. M. (2015). Remediation of heavy metal contaminated ecosystem: An overview on technology advancement. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,12, 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vochozka, M., Marouskova, A., Vachal, J., & Strakova, J. (2016). Biochar pricing hampers biochar farming. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,18(4), 1225–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang, Q. (2013). Influence of biomass feedstocks and production temperatures on the structure-activities of biochar. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, PhD. Thesis, pp 12–13.Google Scholar
  43. Wang, C., Lu, H. H., Dong, D., Deng, H., Strong, P. J., Wang, H. L., et al. (2013). Insight into the effects of biochar on manure composting: Evidence supporting the relationship between N2O emission and denitrifying community. Environmental Science and Technology,47(13), 7341–7349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wardle, D. A., Nilsson, M. C., & Zackrisson, O. (2008). Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus. Science,320, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weber, K., & Quicker, P. (2018). Properties of biochar. Fuel,217, 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wei, J., Tu, C., Yuan, G. D., Bi, D. X., Wang, H. L., Zhang, L. J., et al. (2019a). Pyrolysis temperature-dependent changes in the characteristics of biochar-borne dissolved organic matter and its copper binding properties. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,103, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wei, J., Tu, C., Yuan, G. D., Bi, D. X., Xiao, L., Theng, B. K. G., et al. (2019b). Carbon-coated montmorillonite nanocomposite for the removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions. Journal of Hazardous Materials,368, 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wei, J., Tu, C., Yuan, G. D., Liu, Y., Bi, D. X., Xiao, L., et al. (2019c). Assessing the effect of pyrolysis temperature on the molecular properties and copper sorption capacity of a halophyte biochar. Environmental Pollution,251, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu, P., Ata-Ul-Karim, S. T., Singh, B. P., Wang, H. L., Wu, T. L., Liu, C., et al. (2019). A scientometric review of biochar research in the past 20 years (1998–2018). Biochar,1(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xiao, X., Chen, B. L., & Zhu, L. Z. (2014). Transformation, morphology, and dissolution of silicon and carbon in rice straw-derived biochar under different pyrolytic temperatures. Environmental Science and Technology,48(6), 3411–3419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xiao, L., Wei, J., Yuan, G. D., Bi, D. X., Wang, J., Feng, L. R., et al. (2019a). Biochars made in the field using coupled oxygen-limiting and mist spraying technique and their properties. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition),41(6), 15–20.Google Scholar
  52. Xiao, L., Yuan, G. D., Bi, D. X., Wei, J., & Shen, G. H. (2019b). Equipment and technology of field preparation of biochars from agricultural and forest residues under aerobic conditions with water-fire coupled method. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,35(11), 239–244.Google Scholar
  53. Yang, L., Bian, X. G., Yang, R. P., Zhou, C. L., & Tang, B. P. (2018). Assessment of organic amendment for improving coastal saline soil. Land Degradation and Development,29(2), 3204–3211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yuan, S., Zhao, L. X., Meng, H. B., & Shen, Y. J. (2016). The main types of biochar and their properties and expectative researches. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,22(5), 1402–1417.Google Scholar
  55. Zhang, G. X., Liu, X. T., Sun, K., He, Q. H., Qian, T. W., & Yan, Y. L. (2013). Interactions of simazine, metsulfuron-methyl, and tetracycline with biochar and soil as a function of molecular structure. Journal of Soils and Sediments,13(9), 1600–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang, J. H., & Wang, S. (2018). Trace for the motivations of the coalminers’ off-site behaviors based on the evolutionary game theory. Journal of Safety and Environment,18(2), 657–663.Google Scholar
  57. Zhou, Q., Houge, B. A., Tong, Z., Gao, B., & Liu, G. (2018). An in situ technique for producing low-cost agricultural biochar. Pedosphere,28(4), 690–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CAS Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological RemediationYantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)YantaiChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.School of Environmental and Chemical EngineeringZhaoqing UniversityZhaoqingChina

Personalised recommendations