Advertisement

Human health risk assessment of cadmium exposure through rice consumption in cadmium-contaminated areas of the Mae Tao sub-district, Tak, Thailand

  • Parin Suwatvitayakorn
  • Myoung-Soo Ko
  • Kyoung-Woong Kim
  • Penradee ChanpiwatEmail author
Original Paper
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

The Mae Tao sub-district is located in the Mae Tao watershed, an important cadmium (Cd)-contaminated area in Thailand. This study was conducted to (i) determine Cd concentrations in rice collected from households in the area, (ii) assess the Cd exposure and potential health risk (HQ) from rice consumption in local adults and (iii) investigate how the factors of individual characteristics and consumption behavior affect the level of HQ. A total of 159 rice samples were collected from households in all 6 villages of the Mae Tao sub-district for analysis of Cd by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Biodata information and rice consumption behavior were surveyed from local residents at the same time as rice sample collection. Approximately 19.8% and 19.1% of white rice and sticky rice, respectively, contained total Cd higher than the Codex maximum standard of Cd in rice (0.4 mg kg−1). Locally grown rice contained an average of 1.5 times more Cd than retail rice. Cd exposure from consuming only sticky rice was the highest (2.26 × 10−3 mg kg−1 day−1), followed by the consumption of both types of rice (1.39 × 10−3 mg kg−1 day−1) and the consumption of only white jasmine rice (6.30 × 10−4 mg kg−1 day−1). The highest and lowest average HQ values were found in the only sticky rice consumption pattern (2.263) and the only white rice consumption pattern (0.630), respectively. The potential health risk from Cd in each rice consumption pattern was mainly influenced by the total Cd concentration in rice and the rice ingestion rate.

Keywords

Consumption pattern White rice Sticky rice Ingestion rate Eating behavior Thailand 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in the Republic of Korea through the International Environmental Research Institute (IERI) of the Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST). The authors would like to thank the Office of Higher Education Commission (OHEC) and the S&T Postgraduate Education and Research Development Office (PERDO) for the financial support of the Research Program. The authors would like to express sincere thanks to the Environmental Research Institute (ERIC) and the Center of Excellence on Hazardous Substance Management (HSM), Chulalongkorn University, and the Chulalongkorn Academic Advancement in its second century project for their invaluable support with facilities and scientific equipment.

References

  1. Akkajit, P. (2015). Review of the current situation of Cd contamination in agricultural field in the Mae Sot district, Tak province, northwestern Thailand. Applied Environmental Research, 37(1), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC International. (2016). Official methods of analysis (20th Edition): AOACSMPR 2012.007 Standard method performance requirements for heavy metals in a variety of foods and beverages. https://www.aoac.org/aoac_prod_imis/AOAC_Docs/SPSFAM/ERP_071113/SMPR_2012_007.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2019.
  3. ATSDR. (2012). Toxicological profile for cadmium. Atlanta, Georgia: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.Google Scholar
  4. Chunhabundit, R. (2016). Cadmium exposure and potential health risk from foods in contaminated area, Thailand. Toxicological Research, 22(1), 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Codex Alimentarius International Food Standard. (2018). General standard for contaminants and toxins in food and feed: CXS 193-1995. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/thematic-areas/contaminants/en/?fbclid=IwAR1nnaZ6RW0yTDdFlqdo3aS-S295DgNQ4WV-Za6tbLune7DfVuTpCaxwQD4. Accessed February 5, 2019.
  6. Dai, H., Song, X., Huang, B., & Xin, J. (2016). Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Hengyang, China, via consumption of rice. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(8), 1636–1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DPIM. (2010). Cadmium contamination in Mae Tao watershed, Mae Sot district, Tak province (in Thai). https://www.dpim.go.th/articles/article?catid=122&articleid=309. Accessed February 25, 2017.
  8. DPIM. (2015). Survey and impact assessment of mining activities for solutions of land utilization: A case study of Mae Tao watershed, Mae Sot district, Tak province (in Thai). Bangkok: Department of Primary Industry and Mines, Ministry of Industry.Google Scholar
  9. DPIM. (2016). The solution of soil and sediment contamination in Mae Tao watershed, Mae Sot district, Tak province (in Thai). Bangkok: Department of Primary Industry and Mines, Ministry of Industry.Google Scholar
  10. Fang, Y., Sun, X., Yang, W., Ma, N., Xin, Z., Fu, J., et al. (2014). Concentrations and health risks of lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury in rice and edible mushrooms in China. Food Chemistry, 147, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FDA. (2012). Element analysis manual for food and related products. https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/ucm2006954.htm. Accessed March 15, 2018.
  12. Hensawang, S., & Chanpiwat, P. (2017). Health impact assessment of arsenic and cadmium intake via rice consumption in Bangkok, Thailand. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(11), 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ihedioha, J. N., Ujam, O. T., Nwuche, C. O., Ekere, N. R., & Chime, C. C. (2016). Assessment of heavy metal contamination of rice grains (Oryza sativa) and soil from Ada field, Enugu, Nigeria: Estimating the human health risk. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 22(8), 1665–1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IPCS. (2016). Dietary exposure assessment of chemicals in food. In the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organization, and the World Health Organization (Ed.), Environmental Health Criteria 240: Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food.Google Scholar
  15. Israel, G.H. (1992). IFAS Extension: Determining sample size (PEOD6). University of Florida.Google Scholar
  16. IWMI. (2005). Report of LDD-IWMI land zoning and Cd risk assessment activities undertaken in Phatat Pha Daeng and Mae Tao Mai sub-districts, Mae Sot, Tak province, Thailand. Bangkok: International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Ji, K., Kim, J., Lee, M., Park, S., Kwon, H. J., Cheong, H. K., et al. (2013). Assessment of exposure to heavy metals and health risks among residents near abandoned metal mines in Goseong, Korea. Environmental Pollution, 178, 322–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ke, S., Cheng, X. Y., Zhang, N., Hu, H. G., Yan, Q., Hou, L. L., et al. (2015). Cadmium contamination of rice from various polluted areas of China and its potential risks to human health. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(7), 408–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kosolsaksakul, P., Farmer, J. G., Oliver, I. W., & Graham, M. C. (2014). Geochemical associations and availability of cadmium (Cd) in a paddy field system, northwestern Thailand. Environmental Pollution, 187, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meharg, A. A., Norton, G., Deacon, C., Williams, P., Adomako, E. E., Price, A., et al. (2013). Variation in rice cadmium related to human exposure. Environmental Science and Technology, 47, 5613–5618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards. (2016). Food consumption data of Thailand [in Thai]. https://www.acfs.go.th/document/download_document/FCDT.pdf. Accessed October 23, 2018.
  22. OECD. (2016). Table A.7.2. Rice projections: Consumption, food. in OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2016–2025, OECD Publishing: Paris.Google Scholar
  23. OECD/FAO. (2016). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2016–2025. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Padungtod, C., Swaddiwudhipong, W., Nishijo, M., Ruangyuttikarn, W., & Inud, T. (2006). Health risk management for cadmium contamination in Thailand—Are challenges overcome? https://www.who.int/ifcs/documents/forums/forum5/thai_padungtod.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2017.
  25. Phan, K., Sthiannopkao, S., Heng, S., Phan, S., Huoy, L., Wong, M. H., et al. (2013). Arsenic contamination in the food chain and its risk assessment of populations residing in the Mekong River basin of Cambodia. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 262, 1064–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simmons, R. W., Pongsakul, P., Saiyasitpanich, D., & Klinphoklap, S. (2005). Elevated levels of cadmium and zinc in paddy soils and elevated levels of cadmium in rice grain downstream of a zinc mineralized area in Thailand: Implications for public health. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 27, 501–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sriprachote, A., Kanyawongha, P., Ochiai, K., & Matoh, K. (2012). Current situation of cadmium-polluted paddy soil, rice and soybean in the Mae Sot district, Tak province, Thailand. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 58, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swaddiwudhipong, W., Limpatanachote, P., Krintratun, S., & Padungtod, C. (2007). Cadmium-exposed population in Mae Sot district, Tak province: 1. Prevalence of high urinary cadmium levels in the adults. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 90(1), 143–148.Google Scholar
  29. U.S. EPA. (2000a). Cadmium compound. Hazard summary. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/cadmium-compounds.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2018.
  30. U.S. EPA. (2000b). Risk characterization handbook. EPA 100-B-00-002. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  31. Yuan, X., Wang, J., Shang, Y., & Sun, B. (2014). Health risk assessment of cadmium via dietary intake by adults in China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94(2), 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hazardous Substance and Environmental Management (Interdisciplinary Program), Graduate SchoolChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Energy and Resources EngineeringKangwon National UniversityChuncheonRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.School of Earth Sciences and Environmental EngineeringGwangju Institute of Science and TechnologyGwangjuRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Environmental Research InstituteChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  5. 5.Research Program of Toxic Substance Management in the Mining IndustryCenter of Excellence on Hazardous Substance ManagementBangkokThailand
  6. 6.Research Unit of Green Mining ManagementChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations