Fate and partitioning of heavy metals in soils from landfill sites in Cape Town, South Africa: a health risk approach to data interpretation
The fate and persistence of trace metals in soils and sludge from landfill sites are crucial in determining the hazard posed by landfill, techniques for their restoration and potential reuse purposes of landfill sites after closure and restoration. A modified European Community Bureau of Reference’s (BCR) sequential extraction procedure was applied for partitioning and evaluating the mobility and persistence of trace metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Zn) in soils from three landfill sites and sludge sample from Cape Town, South Africa. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy was used to analyze BCR extracts. The mobility sequence based on the BCR mobile fraction showed that Cu (74–87%), Pb (65–80%), Zn (59–82%) and Cd (55–66%) constituted the mobile metals in the soils from the three sites. The mobility of Cu, Zn and Ni (> 95%) was particularly high in the sludge sample, which showed significant enrichment compared to the soil samples. Geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and risk assessment code were used to further assess the environmental risk of the metals in the soils. Exposure to the soils and sludge did not pose any non-cancer risks to adult and children as the hazard quotient and hazard index values were all below the safe level of 1. The cancer risks from Cd, Cr and Ni require that remedial action be considered during closure and restoration of the landfill sites.
KeywordsLandfill site Heavy metal Health risk assessment ICP-OES Fate Partitioning Metal mobility
The authors wish to thank Andrew Rand and Oddette Sharon Kuissu Tokam of the Department of Environmental and Occupational Studies, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, for providing the GIS map used for manuscript.
- Aus.EPA. (2012). Environmental health risk assessment: Guidelines for assessing human health from environmental hazards.Google Scholar
- CoCT. (2017). Landfill sites. http://www.capetown.gov.za/Family%20and%20home/see-all-city-facilities/our-service-facilities/Landfills/. Accessed 07 March 2017.
- Delgado, J., Barba-Brioso, C., Nieto, J. M., & Boski, T. (2011). Speciation and ecological risk of toxic elements in estuarine sediments affected by multiple anthropogenic contributions (Guadiana saltmarshes, SW Iberian Peninsula): I. Surficial sediments. Science of The Total Environment, 409(19), 3666–3679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Demayo, A., Taylor, M. C., Taylor, K. W., Hodson, P. V., & Hammond, P. B. (1982). Toxic effects of lead and lead compounds on human health, aquatic life, wildlife plants, and livestock. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 12(4), 257–305.Google Scholar
- Esakku, S., Palanivelu, K., & Joseph, K. (2003). Assessment of heavy metals in a municipal solid waste dumpsite. In Workshop on sustainable landfill management (Vol. 35, pp. 139–145).Google Scholar
- Kartal, Ş., Aydın, Z., & Tokalıoğlu, Ş. (2006). Fractionation of metals in street sediment samples by using the BCR sequential extraction procedure and multivariate statistical elucidation of the data. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 132(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kienzler, A., Berggren, E., Bessems, J., Bopp, S., van der Linden, S., & Worth, A. (2014). Assessment of mixtures—Review of regulatory requirements and guidance. Joint Research Centre, Science and Policy Reports. Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
- Kouame, I. K., Brou, D., Koffi, K., Savane, I., & Sandu, I. (2010). Statistical approach of assessing horizontal mobility of heavy metals in the soil of Akouedo Landfill Nearby Ebrie Lagoon (Abidjan-Cote D’Ivoire). International Journal of Conservation Science, 1(3), 149–160.Google Scholar
- Li, H., Qian, X., Hu, W., Wang, Y., & Gao, H. (2013). Chemical speciation and human health risk of trace metals in urban street dusts from a metropolitan city, Nanjing, SE China. Science of the Total Environment, 456–457, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muller, G. (1969). Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. Geojournal, 2, 108–118.Google Scholar
- Ogunbanjo, O., Onawumi, O., Gbadamosi, M., Ogunlana, A., & Anselm, O. (2016). Chemical speciation of some heavy metals and human health risk assessment in soil around two municipal dumpsites in Sagamu, Ogun state, Nigeria. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability, 28(1–4), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09542299.2016.1203267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rao, C. R. M., Sahuquillo, A., & Lopez Sanchez, J. F. (2008). A review of the different methods applied in environmental geochemistry for single and sequential extraction of trace elements in soils and related materials. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 189(1), 291–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9564-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sudsandee, S., Tantrakarnapa, K., Tharnpoophasiam, P., Limpanont, Y., Mingkhwan, R., & Worakhunpiset, S. (2017). Evaluating health risks posed by heavy metals to humans consuming blood cockles (Anadara granosa) from the Upper Gulf of Thailand. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(17), 14605–14615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9014-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- USDOE. (2017). The risk assessment information system. https://rais.ornl.gov/. Accessed 07 March 2017.
- USEPA RPA. (1989). Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Human Health Evaluation Manual Part A.Google Scholar
- USEPA. (1996). Soil screening guidance: Technical background document. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (EPA/540/R-95/128).Google Scholar
- USEPA. (2001). Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. Peer Review Draft, OSWER, 9355, 4–24.Google Scholar
- USEPA. (2002). Supplementary guidelines for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.Google Scholar
- USEPA. (2011). Esposure factors handbook 2011 edition (final). EPA/600/R-09/052F. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA. (2016). Regional screening levels (RSLs)—Generic tables (May 2016). https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables-may-2016. Accessed 07 March 2017.
- USEPA, R. (1991). Risk assessment guidance for superfund (RAGS). Human Health Evaluation Manual (HHEM) supplementary guidance. Washington, DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.Google Scholar
- Van den Berg, R. (1994). Human exposure to soil contamination: A qualitative and quantitative analysis towards proposals for human toxicological intervention values (partly revised edition). RIVM Rapport 725201011.Google Scholar
- WCGov, W. C. G. (2013). Regional development profile city of Cape Town.Google Scholar
- Wuana, R. A., & Okieimen, F. E. (2011). Heavy metals in contaminated soils: A review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation. ISRN Ecology.Google Scholar
- Yang, S., Zhou, D., Yu, H., Wei, R., & Pan, B. (2013). Distribution and speciation of metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb) in agricultural and non-agricultural soils near a stream upriver from the Pearl River, China. Environmental Pollution, 177(Supplement C), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar