Advertisement

Quantitative assessment of ecological compensation for groundwater overexploitation based on emergy theory

  • Cuimei Lv
  • Minhua LingEmail author
  • Zening Wu
  • Xi Guo
  • Qianqian Cao
Original Paper

Abstract

Ecological compensation is an important economic tool for the control and management of ecological and environmental problems. The accurate assessment of the amount of compensation is the key factor in the implementation of ecological compensation schemes. However, due to the complex and various ecological and environmental problems caused by groundwater overexploitation, there is no scientific quantitative method. Emergy theory is a new method to quantitatively study the relationship between environmental resources and social economy. Based on the literature review of ecological compensation for groundwater overexploitation, this paper puts forward a new evaluation method for using emergy loss as groundwater overexploitation ecological compensation. The emergy system diagram of environmental problems caused by overexploitation of groundwater is constructed. And the calculation methods of the emergy loss of eco-environmental problems caused by groundwater overexploitation, such as land subsidence (collapse), salt water intrusion, surface runoff reduction, vegetation deterioration, and groundwater pollution, were presented, respectively. Taking Zhengzhou as an example, the total amount of ecological compensation for groundwater overexploitation in 2014 was equivalent to 853 × 106 US dollars. The largest loss of land subsidence is 816 × 106 US dollars, which accounts for 95.64% of the total loss. It can be seen that land subsidence is the most serious in the eco-environmental problems caused by overexploitation of groundwater in Zhengzhou.

Keywords

Groundwater overexploitation Ecological compensation Emergy theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. NSCF-51609216 and NSCF-51739009) and Henan natural science foundation (No. 182300410139). The authors are grateful to colleagues and friends who shared their meteorological and hydrological data with us. We also thank three reviewers for insightful comments that improved an earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Cuperus, R., Bakermans, M. M. G. J., & De Haes, H. A. U. (2001). Ecological compensation in Dutch highway planning. Environmental Management, 27(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cuperus, R., Kalsbeek, M., & de Haes, H. A. U. (2002). Preparation and implementation of seven ecological compensation plans for Dutch highways. Environmental Management, 29(6), 736–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Du, L. J., et al. (2010). Calculation of ecological compensation standard for soil and water conservation. Journal of Water Conservancy, 1, 1346–1352.Google Scholar
  4. Fu, Y. C., Du, X., & Ruan, B. Q. (2017). Agro-ecological compensation of watershed based on emergy. Water Science and Technology, 76(10), 2830–2841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guan, X. J., Chen, M. Y., & Hu, C. H. (2015). An ecological compensation standard based on emergy theory for the Xiao Honghe River basin. Water Science and Technology, 71(10), 1463–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guan, X. J., Liu, W. K., & Chen, M. Y. (2016). Study on the ecological compensation standard for river basin water environment based on total pollutants control. Ecological Indicators, 69, 446–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guo, M. F., Zhao, Z. Q., Yang, D. C., et al. (2015). Zhengzhou groundwater dynamic detection report. Zhengzhou: Henan Province Second Geological Environment Investigation Institute Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Lan, S. F., et al. (2002). Emergy analysis of eco economic system. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press.Google Scholar
  9. Li, F., & Chen, X. (2014). Analysis of surface runoff variation under different depths of groundwater table in Wudaogou Area. Water Resources and Power, 32(9), 19–23.Google Scholar
  10. Li, W. H., et al. (2006). Research status and prospect of forest ecological benefit compensation. Natural Resources Journal, 05, 677–688.Google Scholar
  11. Liu, C., Kong, H. M., & Cao, H. M. (2017). Ecological compensation system and manage countermeasures for coal-fired power plants in China. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 24(5), 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, W. J., et al. (2016). Ecological compensation mechanism for mining of nonferrous metal mineral resources based on emergy theory. Journal of Ecology, 24, 1–6.Google Scholar
  13. Mohamed, E. A., & Turki, F. (2017). Spatial distribution and health risk assessment for groundwater contamination from intensive pesticide use in arid areas. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 39, 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Odum, H. T. (1996). Environmental accounting: Emergy and environmental decision making. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Pan, B., Li, J. J., Li, C. D., et al. (2014). Zhengzhou water environment annual report. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou Environmental Protection Agency Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Rahaman, S., Sinha, A. C., Pati, R., et al. (2013). Arsenic contamination: A potential hazard to the affected areas of West Bengal, India. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 35, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ruan, B. Q., et al. (2008). Research progress and practice of ecological compensation in watershed. Journal of Water Conservancy, 10, 1220–1225.Google Scholar
  18. Sheng, W. P., Zhen, L., & Xie, G. D. (2017). Determining eco-compensation standards based on the ecosystem services value of the mountain ecological forests in Beijing, China. Ecosystem Services, 26, 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shi, Z. M., & Huang, W. (2009). Study on ecological compensation mechanism for large amount of groundwater utilization. Yangtze Academy of Sciences, 09, 21–24.Google Scholar
  20. Sibly, R., & Calow, P. (1987). Ecological compensation: A complication for testing life-history theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 12(2), 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Teng, F., Han, Y. J., Zhao, G. C., et al. (2014). Zhengzhou statistical yearbook. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou Statistics Bureau Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Vaissiere, A.-C., Levrel, H., & Hily, C. (2013). Selecting ecological indicators to compare maintenance costs related to the compensation of damaged ecosystem services. Ecologocal Indicators, 29, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Villarroya, A., Persson, J., & Puig, J. (2014). Ecological compensation: From general guidance and expertise to specific proposals for road developments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Villarroya, A., & Puig, J. (2013). A proposal to improve ecological compensation practice in road and railway projects in Spain. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 42, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, L. (2012). Study on financing methods of groundwater ecological compensation in China. Accounting Research, 19, 14–16.Google Scholar
  26. Wang, L., & Ma, D. C. (2015). The study on groundwater ecological compensation mechanism leading by the government. Environmental Protection, 17, 44–47.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, L., & Yang, Z. Y. (2013). Study on ecological compensation of groundwater system based on ecological value. Shandong Social Sciences, 12, 83–87.Google Scholar
  28. Wu, Z. N. (2015). Evaluation report on the current situation of water resources in Zhengzhou. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Wu, Z. N., Guo, X., Lv, C. M., et al. (2018). Study on the quantification method of water pollution ecological compensation standard based on emergy theory. Ecological Indicators, 92, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xie, X., Xie, H. L., & Shu, C. (2017). Estimation of ecological compensation standards for fallow heavy metal-polluted farmland in China based on farmer willingness to accept. Sustainability, 9(10), 1859–1867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang, R. R., Chen, X., & Zhang, Z. C. (2013). Influences on surface runoff and infiltration recharge under different groundwater depths with numerical model. Water Resources and power, 31(6), 43–46.Google Scholar
  32. Zhang, S. L., Xi, X. J., Liu, Y. Z., et al. (2014). Zhengzhou water resources bulletin. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou Water Conservancy Bureau Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Water Conservancy and EnvironmentZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations