Advertisement

Environmental Geochemistry and Health

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 2635–2655 | Cite as

Effective integrated frameworks for assessing mining sustainability

  • K. M. Virgone
  • M. Ramirez-Andreotta
  • J. Mainhagu
  • M. L. Brusseau
Review Paper
  • 117 Downloads

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to review existing methods used for assessing mining sustainability, analyze the limited prior research that has evaluated the methods, and identify key characteristics that would constitute an enhanced sustainability framework that would serve to improve sustainability reporting in the mining industry. Five of the most relevant frameworks were selected for comparison in this analysis, and the results show that there are many commonalities among the five, as well as some disparities. In addition, relevant components are missing from all five. An enhanced evaluation system and framework were created to provide a more holistic, comprehensive method for sustainability assessment and reporting. The proposed framework has five components that build from and encompass the twelve evaluation characteristics used in the analysis. The components include Foundation, Focus, Breadth, Quality Assurance, and Relevance. The enhanced framework promotes a comprehensive, location-specific reporting approach with a concise set of well-defined indicators. Built into the framework is quality assurance, as well as a defined method to use information from sustainability reports to inform decisions. The framework incorporates human health and socioeconomic aspects via initiatives such as community-engaged research, economic valuations, and community-initiated environmental monitoring.

Keywords

Sustainability Mining Indicators Environmental impact 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Arizona International Human–Environment Observatory (OHMI), the French CNRS Institute of Ecology and Environment (INEE), the CNRS Institute of the Social Sciences (INSHS), the Center for Environmentally Sustainable Mining (CESM), the NIEHS Superfund Program (P42 ES04940), and the Water, Environmental, and Energy Solutions (WEES) Program of The University of Arizona for financial support to this project. We also thank Dr. Franck Poupeau for his support of the project.

References

  1. Azapagic, A. (2004). Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 639–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azapagic, A. & Perdan, S. (2000). Indicators of sustainable development for industry: A general framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78(4), 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu, A. J., & Kumar, U. (2004). Innovation and technology driven sustainability performance management framework (ITSPM) for the mining and minerals sector. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 18, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., et al. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Washington, DC: Center Advancement Informal Science Education (CAISE).Google Scholar
  5. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., et al. (1997). The value of the worlds ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dashwood, H. S. (2014). Sustainable development and industry self-regulation: Developments in the Global Mining Sector. Business and Society, 53(4), 551–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emel, J., Makene, M. H., & Wnagari, E. (2012). Problems with reporting and evaluation mining industry community development projects: A case study from Tanzania. Sustainability, 4, 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EPA Office of Research and Development. (2011). A framework for sustainability indicators at the EPA. Washington, D.C.: National Academies.Google Scholar
  9. Fonseca, A., Mcallister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2013). Measuring what? A comparative anatomy of five mining sustainability frameworks. Minerals Engineering, 46–47, 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fonseca, A., Mcallister, M. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2014). Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giurco, D., & Cooper, C. (2012). Mining and sustainability: Asking the right questions. Minerals Engineering, 29, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2013). Hazardous waste cleanup: Observations on states’ role, liabilities at DOD and hardrock mining sites, and litigation issues. Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Environment and the Economy, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, Wednesday, May 22, 2013. GAO-13-633T, United States Government Accountability Office, 441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548.Google Scholar
  13. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2010). Sustainability reporting guidelines & mining and metals sector supplement. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3-English-Mining-and-Metals-Sector-Supplement.pdf. Accessed 2014.
  14. Groot, R. D., Brander, L., Van Der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., et al. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hacking, T., & Guthrie, P. (2008). A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM). (2014). Sustainable development framework. https://www.icmm.com/website/publications/pdfs/commitments/revised-2015_icmm-principles.pdf. Accessed 2018.
  17. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (1992). Business strategies for sustainable development. Winnipeg, Canada: IISD.Google Scholar
  18. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2003). Out of respect—The Tahltan, mining and the seven questions to sustainability. British Columbia: IISD Dease Lake.Google Scholar
  19. IISD. (2012). Compendium: A global directory to indicator initiatives. International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/library/compendium-sustainable-development-indicator-initiatives. Accessed 2014.
  20. IISD and OECD. (2010). BellagioSTAMP: SusTainability assessment and measurement principles. Winnipeg, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  21. Jenkins, H., & Yakovela, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, F., Liu, X., Zhao, D., Wang, B., Jin, J., & Hu, D. (2011). Evaluating and modeling ecosystem service loss of coal mining: A case study of Mentougou district of Beijing, China. Ecological Comlpexity, 8, 139–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lodhia, S., & Hess, N. (2014). Sustainability accounting and reporting in the mining industry: Current literature and directions for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MAC. (2014). Towards Sustainable Mining Progress Report 2014. Mining Association of Canada, MAC.Google Scholar
  25. Marimon, F., del Mar Alonso-Almeida, M., del Pilar Rodriguez, M., & Alejandro, K. A. C. (2012). The worldwide diffusion of the Global Reporting Initiative: What is the point? Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being; opportunities and challenges for business and industry. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  27. MMSD. (2002). Seven Questions of Sustainability: How to Assess the Contributions of Mining and Mineral Activities. MMSD, WBCSD, Manitoba: IISD.Google Scholar
  28. Moran, C. J., Lodhia, S., Kunz, N. C., & Huisingh, D. (2014). Sustainability in mining, minerals and energy: New processes, pathways and human interactions for a cautiously optimistic future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NCP (2008) InVEST: Integrated valuation of ecosystem services and tradeoffs. Natural Captial Project.org. https://www.naturalcapitalproject.org/invest/#what-isinvest. Accessed 2015.
  30. Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60, 498–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramirez-Andreotta, M. D., Brusseau, M. L., Artiola, J. F., Maier, R. M., & Gandolfi, A. J. (2014). Environmental research translation: enhancing interactions with communities at contaminated sites. Science of the Total Environment, 497–498, 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramirez-Andreotta, M. D., Brusseau, M. L., Artiola, J. F., Maier, R. M., & Gandolfi, A. J. (2015). Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The gardenroots case study. International Public Health Journal, 7(1), 139–153.Google Scholar
  33. Ramirez-Andreotta, M. D., Brusseau, M. L., Beamer, P., & Maier, R. M. (2013). Home gardening near a mining site in an arsenic-endemic region of Arizona: Assessing arsenic exposure dose and risk via ingestion of home garden vegetables, soils, and water. Science of the Total Environment, 454, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roca, L. C., & Searcy, C. (2012). An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. US Department of Energy (DOE). (2014). The water energy Nexus: Challenges and opportunities. DOE/EPSA-0002. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/07/f17/Water%20Energy%20Nexus%20Full%20Report%20July%202014.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2014.
  36. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). Using economic valuation methods for environment and health assessment. http://www.who.int/heli/economics/valmethods/en/. Accessed 2015.
  38. Yellishetty, M., Ranjoth, P. G., Tharumarajah, A., & Bhosale, S. (2009). Life cycle assessment in the minerals and meal sector: A critical review of selected issues and challenges. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. M. Virgone
    • 1
  • M. Ramirez-Andreotta
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Mainhagu
    • 1
  • M. L. Brusseau
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Soil, Water, and Environmental Science Department, School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Community, Environment and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public HealthUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences Department, School of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations