Biochar-based constructed wetlands to treat reverse osmosis rejected concentrates in chronic kidney disease endemic areas in Sri Lanka
- 171 Downloads
The objectives were to investigate the potential remedial measures for reverse osmosis (RO) rejected water through constructed wetlands (CWs) with low-cost materials in the media established in chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDu) prevalent area in Sri Lanka. A pilot-scale surface and subsurface water CWs were established at the Medawachchiya community-based RO water supply unit. Locally available soil, calicut tile and biochar were used in proportions of 81, 16.5 and 2.5% (w/w), respectively, as filter materials in the subsurface. Vetiver grass and Scirpus grossus were selected for subsurface wetland while water lettuce and water hyacinth were chosen for free water surface CWs. Results showed that the CKDu sensitive parameters; total dissolved solids, hardness, total alkalinity and fluoride were reduced considerably (20–85%) and most met desirable levels of stipulated ambient standards. Biochar seemed to play a major role in removing fluoride from the system which may be due to the existing and adsorbed K+, Ca+2, Mg+2, etc. on the biochar surface via chemisorption. The least reduction was observed for alkalinity. This study indicated potential purification of aforesaid ions in water which are considerably present in RO rejection. Therefore, the invented bio-geo constructed wetland can be considered as a sustainable, economical and effective option for reducing high concentrations of CKDu sensitive parameters in RO rejected water before discharging into the inland waters.
KeywordsReverse osmosis CKDu Fluoride Phytoremediation Constructed wetlands Biochar
The authors are grateful to the support given by Mr. Asela Bandara Karunashinghe, Mr. H.A. Jayasiri, Mr. S.C. Rathnayake at the National Water Supply and Drainage Board and the community-based organization at Sangilikanadarawa, Medawachchiya, Sri Lanka.
- Arceilvala, S. J., & Asolekar, S. R. (2007). Wastewater treatment for pollution control and reuse. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Limited.Google Scholar
- Awuah, E., Oppong-Peprah, M., Lubberding, H. J., & Gijzen, H. J. (2004). Comparative performance studies of water lettuce, duckweed, and algal-based stabilization ponds using low-strength sewage. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 67(20–22), 1727–1739. doi:10.1080/15287390490493466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chandrajith, R., Dissanayake, C. B., Ariyarathna, T., Herath, H. M. J. M. K., & Padmasiri, J. P. (2011). Dose-dependent Na and Ca in fluoride-rich drinking water—another major cause of chronic renal failure in tropical arid regions. Science of the Total Environment, 409(4), 671–675. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.10.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Giraldo, E., & Garzon, A. (2002). The potential for water hyacinth to improve the quality of Bogota river water in the Muña reservoir: Comparison with the performance of waste stabilization ponds. Water Science and Technology, 42, 103–110.Google Scholar
- Herath, I., Iqbal, M. C. M., Al-Wabel, M. I., Abduljabbar, A., Ahmad, M., Usman, A. R. A., et al. (2015a). Bioenergy-derived waste biochar for reducing mobility, bioavailability, and phytotoxicity of chromium in anthropized tannery soil. Journal of Soils and Sediments. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1332-y.Google Scholar
- Herath, I., & Vithanage, M. (2015). Phytoremediation in constructed wetlands. In A. A. Ansari, S. S. Gill, R. Gill, G. R. Lanza, & L. Newman (Eds.), Phytoremediation: Management of environmental contaminants (Vol. 2, pp. 243–263). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Jamuna, S., & Noorjahan, C. M. (2009). Treatment of sewage waste water using water hyacinth-Eichhornia sp and its reuse for fish culture. Toxicology International, 16, 103–106.Google Scholar
- Mohan, D., Sharma, R., Singh, V. K., Steele, P., & Pittman, C. U. (2012). Fluoride removal from water using bio-char, a green waste, low-cost adsorbent: Equilibrium uptake and sorption dynamics modeling. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(2), 900–914. doi:10.1021/ie202189v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rezania, S., Ponraj, M., Talaiekhozani, A., Mohamad, S. E., Md Din, M. F., Taib, S. M., et al. (2015). Perspectives of phytoremediation using water hyacinth for removal of heavy metals, organic and inorganic pollutants in wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 163, 125–133. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rizwan, M. M., & Athapattu, B. C. L. (2014). Removal of nutrients from urban water by engineered constructed wetland with bio-geo filter and biotope. OUSL Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(2), 39–55.Google Scholar
- Shreesadh, E. C., Sandeep, T., & Chauhan, M. S. (2013). Treatment of RO reject for tannery industry—A technical review. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainability, 1(4), 113–116.Google Scholar
- Vithanage, M., Jayarathna, L., Rajapaksha, A. U., Dissanayake, C. B., Bootharaju, M. S., & Pradeep, T. (2012). Modeling sorption of fluoride on to iron rich laterite. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 398, 69–75. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wasana, H. M. S., Perera, G. D. R. K., Gunawardena, P. D. S., Fernando, P. S., & Bandara, J. (2017). WHO water quality standards Vs Synergic effect(s) of fluoride, heavy metals and hardness in drinking water on kidney tissues. Scientific Reports, 7, 42516, doi:10.1038/srep42516. http://www.nature.com/articles/srep42516#supplementary-information.
- Zeng, Z., Zhang, S.-D., Li, T.-Q., Zhao, F.-L., He, Z.-L., Zhao, H.-P., et al. (2013). Sorption of ammonium and phosphate from aqueous solution by biochar derived from phytoremediation plants. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 14(12), 1152–1161. doi:10.1631/jzus.B1300102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar