Characteristics of PM2.5, CO2 and particle-number concentration in mass transit railway carriages in Hong Kong
- 299 Downloads
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) levels, carbon dioxide (CO2) levels and particle-number concentrations (PNC) were monitored in train carriages on seven routes of the mass transit railway in Hong Kong between March and May 2014, using real-time monitoring instruments. The 8-h average PM2.5 levels in carriages on the seven routes ranged from 24.1 to 49.8 µg/m3, higher than levels in Finland and similar to those in New York, and in most cases exceeding the standard set by the World Health Organisation (25 µg/m3). The CO2 concentration ranged from 714 to 1801 ppm on four of the routes, generally exceeding indoor air quality guidelines (1000 ppm over 8 h) and reaching levels as high as those in Beijing. PNC ranged from 1506 to 11,570 particles/cm3, lower than readings in Sydney and higher than readings in Taipei. Correlation analysis indicated that the number of passengers in a given carriage did not affect the PM2.5 concentration or PNC in the carriage. However, a significant positive correlation (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.834) was observed between passenger numbers and CO2 levels, with each passenger contributing approximately 7.7–9.8 ppm of CO2. The real-time measurements of PM2.5 and PNC varied considerably, rising when carriage doors opened on arrival at a station and when passengers inside the carriage were more active. This suggests that air pollutants outside the train and passenger movements may contribute to PM2.5 levels and PNC. Assessment of the risk associated with PM2.5 exposure revealed that children are most severely affected by PM2.5 pollution, followed in order by juveniles, adults and the elderly. In addition, females were found to be more vulnerable to PM2.5 pollution than males (p < 0.001), and different subway lines were associated with different levels of risk.
KeywordsCO2 PM2.5 Particle-number concentration (PNC) Mass transit railway (MTR) Hong Kong
- Cheng, Y. H., Liu, Z. S., & Yan, J. W. (2012). Comparisons of PM10, PM2.5, particle number and CO2 levels inside Metro trains traveling in underground tunnels and on elevated tracks. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 12(5), 879–891.Google Scholar
- CSDHK (Census and Statistics Department of Hong Kong). (2015). Women and Men in Hong Kong: Key Statistics (Statistical Reports). http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11303032015AN15B0100.pdf.
- Gómez-Perales, J. E., Colvile, R. N., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Fernández-Bremauntz, A., Gutiérrez-Avedoy, V. J., Páramo-Figueroa, V. H., et al. (2004). Commuters’ exposure to PM2.5, CO, and benzene in public transport in the metropolitan area of Mexico City. Atmospheric Environment, 38(8), 1219–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harrison, R. M., Thornton, C. A., Lawrence, R. G., Mark, D., Kinnersley, R. P., & Ayres, J. G. (2002). Personal exposure monitoring of particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide, including susceptible groups. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59(10), 671–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Havas, M., Shum, S., Dhalla, R. (2004). Passenger exposure to magnetic fields on go trains and on buses, streetcars, and subways run by the Toronto transit commission, Toronto, Canada, Biological Effects of EMFs, 3rd International Workshop, Kos, Greece 4–8 October 2004, 1065–1071.Google Scholar
- Jung, H. J., Kim, B. W., Ryu, J. Y., Maskey, S., Kim, J. C., Sohn, J., & Ro, C. U. (2010). Source identification of particulate matter collected at underground subway stations in Seoul, Korea using quantitative single-particle analysis. Atmospheric Environment, 44(19), 2287–2293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McNamara, M. L., Noonan, C. W., & Ward, T. J. (2011). Correction factor for continuous monitoring of wood smoke fine particulate matter. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 11(3), 315–322.Google Scholar
- Meng, Q. Y., Turpin, B. J., Korn, L., Weisel, C. P., Morandi, M., Colome, S., et al. (2005). Influence of ambient (outdoor) sources on residential indoor and personal PM2.5 concentrations: analyses of RIOPA data. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 15, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MTR Corporation Limited. (2014). http://www.mtr.com.hk/eng/overview/profile_index.html.
- Pope III, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Thurston, G. D., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., & Godleski, J. J. (2004). Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease. Circulation, 109, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- USEPA. (2004). Air quality criteria for particulate matter (Final Report, Oct 2004), EPA 600/P-99/002aF-bF. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA. (2005). Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment, EPA/630/P-03/001F. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar