Achieving attainable outcomes from good science in an untidy world: case studies in land and air pollution
While scientific understanding of environmental issues develops through careful observation, experiment and modelling, the application of such advances in the day to day world is much less clean and tidy. Merseyside in northwest England has an industrial heritage from the earliest days of the industrial revolution. Indeed, the chemical industry was borne here. Land contamination issues are rife, as are problems with air quality. Through the examination of one case study for each topic, the practicalities of applied science are explored. An integrated, multidisciplinary response to pollution needs more than a scientific risk assessment. The needs of the various groups (from public to government) involved in the situations must be considered, as well as wider, relevant contexts (from history to European legislation), before a truly integrated response can be generated. However, no such situation exists in isolation and the introduction of environmental investigations and the exploration of suitable, integrated responses will alter the situation in unexpected ways, which must be considered carefully and incorporated in a rolling fashion to enable solutions to continue to be applicable and relevant to the problem being faced. This integrated approach has been tested over many years in Merseyside and found to be a robust approach to ever-changing problems that are well described by the management term, “wicked problems”.
KeywordsLand contamination Contaminated land Air pollution Public involvement Public health risk assessment Wicked problems Environmental public health Applied science
- Barker, T. C. (1960). Pilkington brothers and the glass industry. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
- Barker, T. C., & Harris, J. R. (1954). A merseyside town in the industrial revolution St Helens 1750–1900. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
- Booth, C. A., Shilton, V., Fullen, M. A., Walden, J., Worsley, A. T., & Power, A. L. (2006). Environmental magnetism: Measuring, monitoring and modelling urban street dust pollution. In J. W. S. Longhurst & C. A. Brebbia (Eds.), Air pollution XIV (pp. 333–341). Southampton: WIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Costa, L. G., Cole, T. B., Coburn, J., Chang, Y. C., Dao, K., & Roque, P. (2014). Neurotoxicants are in the air: Convergence of human, animal, and in vitro studies on the effects of air pollution on the brain. Biomedical Research International, 2014, 736385.Google Scholar
- DEFRA. (2008). Guidance on the legal definition of contaminated land. London: Crown Copyright. PB 13149.Google Scholar
- Gowers, A. M., Miller, B. G., & Stedman, J. R. (2014). Estimating local mortality burdens associated with particulate air pollution. Public Health England. London: Crown Copyright. PHE publications gateway number 2014016.Google Scholar
- Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2013). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 2013, 0095399713481601.Google Scholar
- IOM (Institute of Medicine). (2013). Environmental decisions in the face of uncertainty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D., Moore, H. M., Fox, H. R., & Elliott, S. (2003). Stabilisation of Galligu. In Land reclamation: Extending the boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th international conference of the international affiliation of land reclamationists, Runcorn, UK, 13–16 May 2003 (pp. 151–158). Leiden: AA Balkema Publishers.Google Scholar
- Lippmann, M., Chen, L. C., Gordon, T., Ito, K., & Thurston, G. (2013). National Particle Component Toxicity (NPACT) initiative: Integrated epidemiologic and toxicologic studies of the health effects of particulate matter components. Research Report (Health Effects Institute), 177, 5–13.Google Scholar
- Marmot, M., Allen, J., Bell, R., Bloomer, E., Goldblatt, P., on behalf of the Consortium for the European Review of Social Determinants of Health and the Health Divide. (2012). WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 380(9846): 1011–1029.Google Scholar
- Reid, J. R., Jarvis, R., Richardson, J., & Stewart, A. G. (2005). Responding to chronic environmental problems in Cheshire & Merseyside—Systems and Procedures. Chemical Hazards and Poisons Report, 4, 33–35. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/202984/rep_CHAPR4May2005.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2015.
- REVIHAAP. (2013). Review of the evidence on health aspects of air pollution—REVIHAAP: Final technical report. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/193108/REVIHAAP-Final-technical-report-final-version.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2014.
- Stewart, A. G., Worsley, A., Holden, V., & Hursthouse, A. S. (2012). Evaluating the impact of interdisciplinary networking in environmental geochemistry and health: Reviewing SEGH conferences and workshops. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, Special edition, 34(6), 653–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- US EPA. (1985). Superfund health assessment manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- Vedal, S., Campen, M. J., McDonald, J. D., et al. (2013). National particle component toxicity (NPACT) initiative report on cardiovascular effects. Research Report (Health Effects Institute), 178, 5–8.Google Scholar
- Wragg, J., Cave, M., Basta, N., et al. (2011). An inter-laboratory trial of the unified BARGE bioaccessibility method for arsenic, cadmium and lead in soil. Science of the Total Environment, 409(19), 4016–4030.Google Scholar