Geospatial association between adverse birth outcomes and arsenic in groundwater in New Hampshire, USA
There is increasing evidence of the role of arsenic in the etiology of adverse human reproductive outcomes. Because drinking water can be a major source of arsenic to pregnant women, the effect of arsenic exposure through drinking water on human birth may be revealed by a geospatial association between arsenic concentration in groundwater and birth problems, particularly in a region where private wells substantially account for water supply, like New Hampshire, USA. We calculated town-level rates of preterm birth and term low birth weight (term LBW) for New Hampshire, by using data for 1997–2009 stratified by maternal age. We smoothed the rates by using a locally weighted averaging method to increase the statistical stability. The town-level groundwater arsenic probability values are from three GIS data layers generated by the US Geological Survey: probability of local groundwater arsenic concentration >1 µg/L, probability >5 µg/L, and probability >10 µg/L. We calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) between the reproductive outcomes (preterm birth and term LBW) and the arsenic probability values, at both state and county levels. For preterm birth, younger mothers (maternal age <20) have a statewide r = 0.70 between the rates smoothed with a threshold = 2,000 births and the town mean arsenic level based on the data of probability >10 µg/L; for older mothers, r = 0.19 when the smoothing threshold = 3,500; a majority of county level r values are positive based on the arsenic data of probability >10 µg/L. For term LBW, younger mothers (maternal age <25) have a statewide r = 0.44 between the rates smoothed with a threshold = 3,500 and town minimum arsenic concentration based on the data of probability >1 µg/L; for older mothers, r = 0.14 when the rates are smoothed with a threshold = 1,000 births and also adjusted by town median household income in 1999, and the arsenic values are the town minimum based on probability >10 µg/L. At the county level for younger mothers, positive r values prevail, but for older mothers, it is a mix. For both birth problems, the several most populous counties—with 60–80 % of the state’s population and clustering at the southwest corner of the state—are largely consistent in having a positive r across different smoothing thresholds. We found evident spatial associations between the two adverse human reproductive outcomes and groundwater arsenic in New Hampshire, USA. However, the degree of associations and their sensitivity to different representations of arsenic level are variable. Generally, preterm birth has a stronger spatial association with groundwater arsenic than term LBW, suggesting an inconsistency in the impact of arsenic on the two reproductive outcomes. For both outcomes, younger maternal age has stronger spatial associations with groundwater arsenic.
KeywordsPreterm birth Low birth weight Arsenic Groundwater Locally weighted averaging smoothing New Hampshire
Acknowledgements: This study is supported by USNIH grants P20RO18787, P20ES018175, and USEPA grant RD83459901.The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. *ArcGIS is a product name of the Environmental System Research Institute, Redland, California, US. Any use of trade, firm, or product names in this paper is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
- Ayotte, J. D., Cahillane, M., Hayes, L., & Robinson, K. W. (2012). Estimated probability of arsenic in groundwater from bedrock aquifers in New Hampshire, 2011. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2012–5156. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5156/.
- Braud, T., Nouer, S., & Lamar, K. (2011). Residential proximity to toxic release sites and the implications for low birth weight and premature delivery. Journal of Environmental Health, 73(6), 8–13.Google Scholar
- Flanagan, S. F., Ayotte, J. D., & Robinson, Jr. G. R. (2011). Quality of water from crystalline rock aquifers in New England, New Jersey, and New York, 1995–2007. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2011–5220. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2011/5220/.
- Helsel, D. R. (2005). Nondetects and data analysis: Statistics for censored environmental data (1st ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Helsel, D. R., & Hirsch, R. M. (1992). Statistical methods in water resources. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Company Inc.Google Scholar
- Huyck, K. L., Kile, M. L., Mahiuddin, G., Quamruzzaman, Q., Rahman, M., Breton, C. V., et al. (2007). Maternal arsenic exposure associated with low birth weight in Bangladesh. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine/American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 49, 1097–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kwok, R. K., Kaufmann, R. B., & Jakariya, M. (2006). Arsenic in drinking-water and reproductive health outcomes: A study of participants in the Bangladesh integrated nutrition programme. Journal of Health Population Nutrition, 24(2), 190–205.Google Scholar
- Slama, R., Morgenstern, V., Cyrys, J., Zutavern, A., Herbarth, O., Wichmann, H.-E., et al. (2007). Traffic-related atmospheric pollutants levels during pregnancy and offspring’s term birth weight: A study relying on a land-use regression exposure model. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(9), 1283–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vahter, M. E., Li, L., Nermell, B., Rahman, A., El Arifeen, S., Rahman, M., et al. (2006). Arsenic exposure in pregnancy: A population-based study in Matlab, Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 24, 236–245.Google Scholar
- Waller, L. A., & Gotway, C. A. (2004). Applied spatial statistics for public health data. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- WHO. (2002). The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar