Environmental Geochemistry and Health

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 457–465 | Cite as

Arsenic bioaccessibility in a gold mining area: a health risk assessment for children

  • Fábio Benedito OnoEmail author
  • Luiz Roberto Guimarães Guilherme
  • Evanise Silva Penido
  • Geila Santos Carvalho
  • Beverley Hale
  • Regla Toujaguez
  • Jochen Bundschuh
Original paper


High concentrations of total arsenic (As) have been measured in soils of gold mining areas of Brazil. However, bioaccessibility tests have not yet been conducted on those materials, which is essential for better health risk estimates. This study aimed at evaluating As bioaccessibility in samples from a gold mining area located in Brazil and assessing children’s exposure to As-contaminated materials. Samples were collected from different materials (a control and four As-contaminated soils/sediments) found in a gold mine area located in Paracatu (MG), Brazil. Total and bioaccessible As concentrations were determined for all samples. The control soil presented the lowest As concentrations, while all other materials contained high total As concentrations (up to 2,666 mg kg−1) and low bioaccessible As percentage (<4.2%), indicating a low risk from exposure of resident children next to this area. The calculated dose of exposure indicated that, except for the pond tailings, in all other areas, the exposure route considering soil ingestion contributed at most to 9.7% of the maximum As allowed ingestion per day (0.3 μg kg−1 BW day−1).


Trace elements In vitro tests Human health Anthropogenic impacts Environmental contamination 



The authors acknowledge The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq Grant 577513/2008-7); The Research Foundation of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG Grants CAG PPM 187-09 & CAG APQ 118-09); and The Kinross Canada-Brazil Network for Advanced Education and Research in Land Resource Management for their financial support.


  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2007). Cercla priority list of hazardous substances, 2007. Accessed June 25, 2010 from
  2. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). (2009). Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs). Accessed September 25, 2010 from
  3. Andrade, R. P., Santana-Filho, S., Mello, J. W. V., Figueiredo, B. R., & Dussin, T. M. (2008). Arsenic mobilization from sulfidic materials from gold mines in Minas Gerais state. Química Nova, 31(5), 1127–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borba, R. P., Figueiredo, B. R., & Matschullat, J. (2003). Geochemical distribution of arsenic in waters, sediments and weathered gold mineralized rocks from iron quadrangle, Brazil. Environmental Geology, 44(1), 39–52.Google Scholar
  5. Borba, R. P., Figueiredo, B. R., Rawlins, B., & Matschullat, J. (2000). Arsenic in water and sediment in the iron quadrangle, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Geociência, 30(3), 558–561.Google Scholar
  6. Bossy, A., Grosbois, C., Beauchemin, S., Courtin-Nomade, A., Hendershot, W., & Bril, H. (2010). Alteration of As-bearing phases in a small watershed located on a high grade arsenic-geochemical anomaly (French Massif Central). Applied Geochemistry, 25(12), 1889–1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). (1997). Canadian soil quality guidelines for the protection of environmental and human health: arsenic (inorganic) fact sheet. CCME (pp. 1–7).Google Scholar
  8. Chung, E., Lee, J. S., Chon, H. T., & Sager, M. (2005). Environmental contamination and bioaccessibility of arsenic and metals around the Dongjeong Au-Ag-Cu mine, Korea. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 5(1), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conama, Resolução No420/2009. (2009). Valores orientadores de qualidade do solo quanto à presença de substâncias químicas, Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente, 2009. Accessed September 2, 2011 from
  10. De Miguel, E., Iribarren, I., Chacon, E., Ordonez, A., & Charlesworth, S. (2007). Risk-based evaluation of the exposure of children to trace elements in playgrounds in Madrid (Spain). Chemosphere, 66, 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Environment Agency (DEFRA and EA). (2002). Soil guideline values for arsenic contamination. Bristol: Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  12. Deschamps, E., Ciminelli, V. S. T., Lange, F. T., Matschullat, J., Raue, B., & Schmidt, H. (2002). Soil and sediment geochemistry of the iron quadrangle, Brazil. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2(4), 216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dube, E. M., Petito Boyce, C., Beck, B. D., Lewandowski, T., & Schettler, S. (2004). Assessment of potential human health risks from arsenic in CCA-treated wood. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 10(6), 1019–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Girouard, E., & Zagury, G. J. (2009). Arsenic bioaccessibility in CCA-contaminated soils: Influence of soil properties, arsenic fractionation and particle-size fraction. Science of the Total Environment, 407(8), 2576–2585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guilherme, L. R. G., & Marchi, G. (2007). Metais em Fertilizantes Inorgânicos: avaliação de risco à saúde após a aplicação. São Paulo: Associação Nacional para Difusão de Adubos.Google Scholar
  16. Hemond, H. F., & Solo-Gabriele, H. M. (2004). Children’s exposure to arsenic from CCA-treated wooden decks and playground structures. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Juhasz, A. L., Smith, E., Weber, J., Rees, M., Rofe, A., Kuhcel, T., et al. (2007). In vitro assessment of arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated (anthropogenic and geogenic) soils. Chemosphere, 69(1), 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koch, I., Duso, A., Haug, C., Miskelly, C., Sommerville, M., Smith, P., et al. (2005). Distinguishing between naturally and anthropogenically elevated arsenic at an abandoned Artic military site. Environmental Forensics, 6(4), 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koch, I., Sylvester, S., Lai, V. W. M., Owen, A., Reimer, K. J., & Cullen, W. R. (2007). Bioaccessibility and excretion of arsenic in Niu Huang Jie Du Pian pills. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 222(3), 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kwon, E., Zhang, H. Q., Wang, Z. W., Jhangri, G. S., Lu, X. F., Fok, N., et al. (2004). Arsenic on the hands of children after playing in playgrounds. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(14), 1375–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ljung, K., Selinus, O., Otabbong, E., & Berglund, M. (2006). Metal and arsenic distribution in soil particle sizes relevant to soil ingestion by children. Applied Geochemistry, 21, 1613–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu, Y., Yin, W., Zhang, G., Huang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Assessment of bioaccessibility and exposure risk of arsenic and lead in urban soils of Guangzhou City, China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 33(2), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matschullat, J., Borba, R. P., Deschamps, E., Figueiredo, B. R., Gabrio, T., & Schwenk, M. (2000). Human and environmental contamination in the iron quadrangle, Brazil. Applied Geochemistry, 15, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meunier, L., Walker, S. R., Wragg, J., Parsons, M. B., Koch, I., Jamieson, H. E., et al. (2010). Effects of soil composition and mineralogy on the bioaccessibility of arsenic from tailings and soil in gold mine districts of Nova Scotia. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(7), 2667–2674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nathanail, C. P., McCaffrey, C., & Haynes, D. (2005). Assessing exposure to pedogenic arsenic contamination at a dwelling in Northamptonshire, UK: A case study. Soil Use and Management, 21, 508–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oomen, A. G., Hack, A., Minekus, M., Zeijdner, E., Cornelis, S. C., Schoeters, G., et al. (2002). Comparison of five in vitro digestion models to study the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Environmental Science and Technology, 36(15), 3326–3334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Palumbo-Roe, B., Cave, M. R., Klinck, B. A., Wragg, J., Taylor, H., O’Donnell, K. E., et al. (2005). Bioaccessibility of arsenic in soils developed over Jurassic ironstones in eastern England. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 27(2), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palumbo-Roe, B., Klinck, B., & Cave, M. (2007). Arsenic speciation and mobility in mine wastes from a copper–arsenic mine in Devon, UK: An SEM, XAS, sequential chemical extraction study. Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment, 9(6), 431–460.Google Scholar
  29. Paustenbach, D. J. (2000). The practice of exposure assessment: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B, 3(3), 179–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pouschat, P., & Zagury, G. J. (2006). In vitro gastrointestinal bioavailability of arsenic in soils collected near CCA—treated utility poles. Environmental Science and Technology, 40(13), 4317–4323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rieuwerts, J. S., Searle, P., & Buck, R. (2006). Bioaccessible arsenic in the home environment in southwest England. Science of the Total Environment, 371, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodriguez, R. R., Basta, N. T., Casteel, S. W., & Pace, L. W. (1999). An in vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soils and solid media. Environmental Science and Technology, 33(4), 642–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruby, M. V., Davis, A., Schoof, R., Eberle, S., & Sellstone, C. M. (1996). Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Science of the Total Environment, 30(2), 422–430.Google Scholar
  34. Ruby, M. V., Schoof, R., Brattin, W., Goldade, M., Post, G., Harnois, M., et al. (1999). Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 33(21), 3697–3705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sarkar, D., Makris, K. C., Parra-Noonan, M. T., & Datta, R. (2007). Effect of soil properties on arsenic fractionation and bioaccessibility in cattle and sheep dipping vat sites. Environment International, 33(2), 164–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1998). Test methods for evaluation solid waste physical and chemical methods: Microwave assisted acid digest of sediments, sludges, soils and oils, SW-846. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. U.S. EPA (1998b) Integrated risk information system: Arsenic, inorganic; CASRN 7440-38-2; Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  38. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Child-specific exposure factors handbook. (2002). EPA/600/P-00/002B; Office of Research and Development; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC; Accessed June 25, 2010 from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fábio Benedito Ono
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luiz Roberto Guimarães Guilherme
    • 1
  • Evanise Silva Penido
    • 1
  • Geila Santos Carvalho
    • 1
  • Beverley Hale
    • 2
  • Regla Toujaguez
    • 1
  • Jochen Bundschuh
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Soil ScienceFederal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering and SurveyingUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations