Environmental Geochemistry and Health

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 49–53 | Cite as

Geochemistry of mineral licks at Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga, South Africa

  • J. D. Stephenson
  • A. Mills
  • J. J. Eksteen
  • A. V. Milewski
  • J. G. Myburgh
Original Paper

Abstract

Although numerous hypotheses have been proposed to explain geophagy, the primary driver of this behaviour remains elusive. Supplementation of scarce nutrients is one commonly cited explanation. We examined the element concentration of three licks relative to adjacent topsoils to infer the possible reasons for geophagy at Loskop Dam Nature Reserve. Lick samples had greater concentrations of B, Co, Zn, Se, Mo and Mn (Loskop Main Lick); Cu (Klopperskloof Lick); and Na (Klopperskloof Lick and Rhenosterhoek Lick) than those of adjacent topsoil. We suggest that supplementation with all or some of these nutrients is a likely driver of geophagy in this fenced reserve, with different licks providing herbivores with different suites of nutrients.

Keywords

Geophagy Nutrient supplementation Nutrition Selenium Sodium 

References

  1. Abrahams, P. W. (1999). The chemistry and mineralogy of three savanna lick soils. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25(10), 2215–2228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aufreiter, S., Hancock, R. G. V., Mahaney, W. C., Stambolic-Robb, A., & Sanmugadas, K. (1997). Geochemistry and mineralogy of soils eaten by humans. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 48, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eksteen, J. J., & Bornman, J. J. (1990). Analysis of natural licks at Loskop Dam and Suikerbosrand Nature Reserves. South African Journal of Wildlife Research, 20(3), 94–99.Google Scholar
  4. EPA. (2007). Method 3050, BSW-846 Manual. United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  5. Hurley, L. S. (1982). Clinical and experimental aspects of manganese in nutrition. In A. Prasad (Ed.), Clinical, biochemical, and nutritional aspects of trace elements (pp. 369–378). New York: Alan R. Liss. Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Kabata-Pendias, A., & Pendias, H. (2001). Trace elements in soils and plants. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC.Google Scholar
  7. Klaus, G., & Schmid, B. (1998). Geophagy at natural licks and mammal ecology: A review. Mammalia, 62(4), 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klaus, G., Klaus-Hugi, C., & Schmid, B. (1998). Geophagy by large mammals at natural licks in the rain forest of the Dzanga National Park, Central African Republic. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 14, 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kreulen, D. A. (1985). Lick use by large herbivores: A review of benefits and banes of soil consumption. Mammal Review, 15(3), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krishnamani, R., & Mahaney, W. C. (2000). Geophagy amoung primates: Adaptive significance and ecological consequences. Animal Behaviour, 59, 899–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mills, A. J., & Milewski, A. (2006). Geophagy and nutrient supplementation in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania, with particular reference to selenium, cobalt and molybdenum. Journal of Zoology, 271, 1–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Stephenson
    • 1
  • A. Mills
    • 2
  • J. J. Eksteen
    • 3
  • A. V. Milewski
    • 4
  • J. G. Myburgh
    • 5
  1. 1.C4 EcoSolutionsTokaiSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Soil ScienceStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa
  3. 3.Mpumalanga Tourism & Parks AgencyNelspruitSouth Africa
  4. 4.Shenton ParkAustralia
  5. 5.Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary ScienceUniversity of PretoriaOnderstepoortSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations