Environmental Geochemistry and Health

, Volume 27, Issue 5–6, pp 443–453 | Cite as

Evaluation of Electrokinetic Remediation of Arsenic-contaminated Soils



The potential of electrokinetic (EK) remediation technology has been successfully demonstrated for the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated fine-grained soils through laboratory scale and field application studies. Arsenic contamination in soil is a serious problem affecting both site use and groundwater quality. The EK technology was evaluated for the removal of arsenic from two soil samples; a kaolinite soil artificially contaminated with arsenic and an arsenic-bearing tailing-soil taken from the Myungbong (MB) gold mine area. The effectiveness of enhancing agents was investigated using three different types of cathodic electrolytes; deionized water (DIW), potassium phosphate (KH2PO4) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The results of the experiments on the kaolinite show that the potassium phosphate was the most effective in extracting arsenic, probably due to anion exchange of arsenic species by phosphate. On the other hand, the sodium hydroxide seemed to be the most efficient in removing arsenic from the tailing-soil. This result may be explained by the fact that the sodium hydroxide increased the soil pH and accelerated ionic migration of arsenic species through the desorption of arsenic species as well as the dissolution of arsenic-bearing minerals.

Key words

arsenic electrokinetic remediation enhancing agents kaolinite tailing-soil 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acar, YB, Alshawabkeh, AN 1993Principles of electrokinetic remediationEnviron Sci Technol2726382647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acar, YB, Gale, RJ, Alshawavkeh, AN 1995Electrokinetic remediation: Basics and technology statusJ Hazard Mater40117137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn, JS, Kim, JY, Chon, CM, Moon, HS 2003Mineralogical and chemical characterization of arsenic solid phase in weathered mine tailings and their leaching potentialEcon Environ Geol362738Google Scholar
  4. Alshawabkeh, AN, Yeung, AT, Bricka, MR 1999Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extractionJ Environ Engrg1252735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azcue, JM, Mudroch, A, Rosa, F, Hall, GEM 1994Effects of abandoned gold mine tailings on the arsenic concentrations in water and sediments of Jack of Clubs Lake, BCEnviron Technol15669678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eykholt GR. 1992 Driving and complicating features of electrokinetic treatment of soils. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
  7. Eykholt, GR, Daniel, DE 1994Impact of system chemistry on electroosmosis in contaminated soilsJ Geotech Engrg, ASCE120797815Google Scholar
  8. Fox, PM, Doner, HE 2002Trace element retention and release on minerals and soil in a constructed wetlandJ Environ Quality31331338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsu CN. 1997 Electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. PhD Thesis, Texas A & M University, College station, TexasGoogle Scholar
  10. Jung, MC, Thornton, I 1996Heavy metal contamination of soils and plants in the vicinity of a lead-zinc mine, KoreaApplied Geochem115359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, KW, Lee, HK, Yoo, BC 1998The environmental impact of gold mines in the Yugu–Kwangcheon Au–Ag metlalogenic province, Republic of KoreaEnviron Technol19291298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim SO. 2001 Electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils and sludges. PhD Thesis, Kwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Republic of KoreaGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, SO, Kim, KW, Stüben, D 2002aEvaluation of electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from tailing soilsJ Environ Engrg128705715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, SO, Moon, SH, Yun, ST, Kim, KW 2002bPilot scale study on the ex situ electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from municipal wastewater sludgesWater Res3647654774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ko, IW, Ahn, JS, Park, YS, Kim, KW 2003Arsenic contamination of soils and sediments from tailings in the vicinity of Myungbong Au mine, KoreaChem Spec Bioav156774Google Scholar
  16. Lageman, R 1993Electro-reclamation: Applications in the NetherlandsEnviron Sci Technol2726482650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Min JS, Cheong YW, Lee HJ, Lee DN. 1997 A study on the environmental and safety problems and their remediation around mining areas. Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Research Report KR-97(c)-32 Google Scholar
  18. Pamukcu, S, Khan, LI, Fang, HY 1990Zinc detoxification of soils by electroosmosis. Geotech Engrg, Transportation Research Record 1288, Transportation Research BoardNational Research CouncilWashington DC4146Google Scholar
  19. Pamukcu, S, Wittle, JK. 1994

    Electrokinetically enhanced in situ soil decontamination

    Wise, DLTrantolo, DJ eds. Remediation of Hazardous Waste Contaminated SoilsMarcel DekkerNew York245298
    Google Scholar
  20. Probstein, RF, Hicks, RE 1993Removal of contaminants from soils by electric fieldsScience260498503Google Scholar
  21. Rφdsand T, Acar YB, Breedveld G. 1995 Electrokinetic extraction of lead from spiked Norwegian marine clay: Characterization, containment, remediation, and performance in environmental geotechnics, Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE 2 New York 1518–1534Google Scholar
  22. Schneider, JF, Johnson, D 1999Portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry characterization of arsenic contamination in soil at a German military siteAT-PROCESS 1998–199941217Google Scholar
  23. Shapiro, AP, Probstein, RF 1993Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by electroosmosisEnviron Sci Technol27283291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smedley, PL, Kinniburgh, DG 2002A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural watersApplied Geochem17517568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. So, CS, Yun, ST, Heo, CH, Choi, SH, Youm, SJ, Choi, SG 1995Fluid inclusion and stable isotope studies of gold and silver-bearing vein deposits, South Korea: Gold-rich mesothermal mineralization of the Boknae MineJ Miner Energy Resour28110Google Scholar
  26. West LJ, Stewart DI. 1995 Effect of zeta potential on soil electrokinesis: Characterization, containment, remediation, and performance in environmental geotechnics, Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE 2 New York 1535–1549Google Scholar
  27. Williams, TM 2001Arsenic in mine waters: an international studyEnviron Geol40267278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yeung, AT, Hsu, C, Menon, RM 1996EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction of leadJ Geotech Engrg, ASCE122666673CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Arsenic Geoenvironment Laboratory (NRL), Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringGwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)GwangjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations