Advertisement

Lateral dispersion in deflected emergent aquatic canopies

  • Mirmosadegh JamaliEmail author
  • Hoda Davari
  • Farrokh Shoaei
Original Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Understanding the mechanism of dispersion within plants is essential for proper operation of natural and constructed treatment wetlands. Plant deflection induced by the current drag modifies the flow and dispersion within an aquatic canopy. In this study, we look at the effect of the deflection angle of the plants on transverse dispersion. Experiments were carried out in a current flume on an array of inclined solid rods representing a deflected emergent canopy. The stem Reynolds number varied between 90 and 360, normalized stem densities between 0.011 and 0.033, and the inclination angles between 0° and 45°. The plume development was recorded using image processing technique. A special post-processing analysis was proposed to handle the discontinuities in the light intensity profile as a result of the light blocking effect of inclined cylinders. The results indicate that the dispersion coefficient increases with the inclination angle as well as vegetation density. However, the effects disappear at Reynolds numbers higher than 240. The effect of inclination angle on lateral dispersion coefficient is effectively described by the associated increase in the actual vegetation density, so the inclination angle and stem density can be combined into one single parameter. Based on a regression analysis, a compact equation is proposed for dispersion coefficient as a function of Reynolds number, stem angle, and vegetation density.

Keywords

Lateral dispersion coefficient Emergent vegetation Flexible vegetation Wetlands Channel flow Image processing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate Sharif University of Technology for support of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Blanton JO, Garrett AJ, Bollinger JS, Hayes DW, Koffman LD, Amft J (2009) Transport and dispersion of a conservative tracer in coastal waters with large intertidal areas. Estuaries Coasts 32(3):573–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fischer HB, List JE, Koh CR, Imberger J, Brooks NH (2013) Mixing in inland and coastal waters. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghisalberti M, Nepf H (2005) Mass transport in vegetated shear flows. Environ Fluid Mech 5(6):527–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghisalberti M, Nepf H (2006) The structure of the shear layer in flows over rigid and flexible canopies. Environ Fluid Mech 6(3):277–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghisalberti M, Nepf H (2009) Shallow flows over a permeable medium: the hydrodynamics of submerged aquatic canopies. Transp Porous Media 78(2):309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gramling CM, Harvey CF, Meigs LC (2002) Reactive transport in porous media: a comparison of model prediction with laboratory visualization. Environ Sci Technol 36(11):2508–2514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang J, Cassiani M, Albertson JD (2009) The effects of vegetation density on coherent turbulent structures within the canopy sublayer: a large-eddy simulation study. Bound-Layer Meteorol 133(2):253–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kadlec R, Wallace S (2009) Treatment wetlands. Taylor and Francis, Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kadlec RH (1990) Overland flow in wetlands, vegetation resistance. J Hydraul Eng 166(5):691–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koch DL, Brady JF (1986) The effective diffusivity of fibrous media. AIChE J 32(4):575–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luhar M, Nepf HM (2011) Flow-induced reconfiguration of buoyant and flexible aquatic vegetation. Limnol Oceanogr 56:2003–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitsch WJ (2009) Wetland ecosystems. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murphy E (2006) Longitudinal dispersion in vegetated flow. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nepf HM (1999) Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 35(2):479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nepf HM, Vivoni ER (2000) Flow structure in depth-limited, vegetated flow. J Geophys Res Oceans 105(C12):28547–28557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sand-Jensen K (2003) Drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes. Freshw Biol 48:271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schincariol RA, Herderick EE, Schwartz FW (1993) On the application of image analysis to determine concentration distributions in laboratory experiments. J Contam Hydrol 12(3):197–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Serra T, Fernando HJ, Rodrı́guez RV (2004) Effects of emergent vegetation on lateral diffusion in wetlands. Water Res 38(1):139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shoaei F (2010) The Experimental investigation of lateral dispersion in vegetated flow. MS thesis, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran (in Farsi) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shoaei F, Crimaldi JP (2017) Effect of instantaneous stirring process on mixing between initially distant scalars in turbulent obstacle wakes. Exp Fluids.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2303-4 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sullivan JA (1996) Effects of marsh grass on diffusivity. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tanino Y, Nepf HM (2007) Experimental investigation of lateral dispersion in aquatic canopies. In: Di Silvio G, Lanzoni S (eds) Proceedings 32nd Congress of IAHRGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tanino Y, Nepf HM (2008) Laboratory investigation of mean drag in a random array of rigid, emergent cylinders. J Hydraul Eng 134(1):34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tarrell AE (1997) A field investigation of diffusion within a submerged plant canopy. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Woods HoleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vivoni-Gallart ER (1998) Turbulence structure of a model seagrass meadow. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    White BL (2006) Momentum and mass transport by coherent structures in a shallow vegetated shear flow. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang W, Choi SU (2009) Impact of stem flexibility on mean flow and turbulence structure in depth-limited open channel flows with submerged vegetation. J Hydraul Res 47(4):445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mirmosadegh Jamali
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hoda Davari
    • 1
  • Farrokh Shoaei
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations