Environmental Fluid Mechanics

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 329–352 | Cite as

Numerical modeling of aquaculture dissolved waste transport in a coastal embayment

  • Subhas K. VenayagamoorthyEmail author
  • Hyeyun Ku
  • Oliver B. Fringer
  • Alice Chiu
  • Rosamond L. Naylor
  • Jeffrey R. Koseff
Original Article


Marine aquaculture is expanding rapidly without reliable quantification of effluents. The present study focuses on understanding the transport of dissolved wastes from aquaculture pens in near-coastal environments using the hydrodynamics code SUNTANS (Stanford Unstructured Nonhydrostatic Terrain-following Adaptive Navier–Stokes Simulator), which employs unstructured grids to compute flows in the coastal ocean at very high resolution. Simulations of a pollutant concentration field (in time and space) as a function of the local environment (bathymetry), flow conditions (tides and wind-induced currents), and the location of the pens were performed to study their effects on the evolution of the waste plume. The presence of the fish farm pens cause partial blockage of the flow, leading to the deceleration of the approaching flow and formation of downstream wakes. Results of both the near-field area (area within 10 to 20 pen diameters of the fish-pen site) as well as far-field behavior of the pollutant field are presented. These detailed results highlight for the first time the importance of the wake vortex dynamics on the evolution of the near-field plume as well as the rotation of the earth on the far-field plume. The results provide an understanding of the impact of aquaculture fish-pens on coastal water quality.


Effluent pollution Dispersion Aquaculture Numerical modeling Plume dynamics Coastal engineering 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bowden KF (1967) Stability effects on turbulent mixing in tidal currents. Phys Fluids Supp 10: S278–S280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    California Fish and Game Code Sec.15008 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region (2002) Waste Discharge Requirements NPDES General Permit for Discharges from Aquaculture and Aquariums. Order no. R3-2002-0076Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chatwin PC (1975) On the longitudinal dispersion of passive contaminant in oscillatory flow in tubes. J Fluid Mech 71: 513–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crimaldi JP, Wiley MB, Koseff JR (2002) The relationship between mean and instantaneous structure in turbulent passive scalar plumes. J Turbul 3(014).
  6. 6.
    Delaux S, Stevens CL, Popinet S (2010) High-resolution computational fluid dynamics modelling of suspended shellfish structures. Environ Fluid Mech. doi: 10.1007/s10652-010-9183-y
  7. 7.
    Fischer HB, List EJ, Koh RC, Imberger J, Brooks NH (1979) Mixing in inland and coastal waters. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fringer OB, Gerritsen MG, Street RL (2006) An unstructured-grid, finite-volume, nonhydrostatic, parallel coastal ocean simulator. Ocean Modell 14: 139–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helsley CE, Kim JW (2005) Mixing downstream of a submerged fish cage: a numerical study. IEEE J Ocean Eng 30(1): 12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoyas S, Jima’enez J (2006) Scaling of the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channel up to Re τ = 2003. Phys Fluids 18(7): 011702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jachec SJ, Fringer OB, Gerritsen MG, Street RL (2006) Numerical simulation of internal tides and the resulting energetics within Monterey Bay and the surrounding area. Geophys Res Lett 33. doi: 10.1029/2006GL026314
  12. 12.
    Lau YL, Krishnappan BG (1977) Transverse dispersion in rectangular channels. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 103(10): 1173–1189Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naylor R (2006) Environmental safeguards for open ocean aquaculture. Natl Acad Sci Issues Sci Technol (Spring) 53–58Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Naylor R, Burke M (2005) Aquaculture and ocean resources: raising tigers of the sea. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30: 185–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plew DR, Spigel RH, Stevens CL, Nokes RI, Davidson MJ (2006) Stratified flow interactions with a suspended canopy. Environ Fluid Mech 6: 519–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Purnama A, Kay A (1999) Effluent discharge into tidal water: optimal or economic strategy?. Environmetrics 10: 601–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rummel AC, Socolofsky SA, Carmer CFv, Jirka GH (2005) Enhanced diffusion from a continuous point source in shallow free-surface flow with grid turbulence. Phys Fluids 17(7): 075105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith R (1982) Contaminant dispersion in oscillatory flows. J Fluid Mech 114: 379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stacey MT, Cowen EA, Powell TM, Dobbins E, Monismith SG, Koseff JR (2000) Plume dispersion in a stratified, near-coastal flow: measurements and modeling. Cont Shelf Res 20(6): 637–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stevens C, Plew D, Hartstein N, Fredriksson D (2008) The physics of open-water shellfish aquaculture. Aquacult Eng. 38(3): 145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang B, Fringer OB, Giddings SN, Fong DA (2009) High-resolution simulations of a macrotidal estuary using SUNTANS. Ocean Modell 28(1–2): 167–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang Z, Fringer OB (2006) A numerical study of nonlinear internal wave generation in the luzon strait. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on stratified flows, pp 300–305Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subhas K. Venayagamoorthy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hyeyun Ku
    • 1
  • Oliver B. Fringer
    • 2
    • 4
  • Alice Chiu
    • 3
  • Rosamond L. Naylor
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jeffrey R. Koseff
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Program on Food Security and the EnvironmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  4. 4.Woods Institute for the EnvironmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations