Advertisement

Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 279–299 | Cite as

Two neighborhood-free plot designs for adaptive sampling of forests

  • Haijun Yang
  • Steen Magnussen
  • Lutz Fehrmann
  • Philip Mundhenk
  • Christoph Kleinn
Article

Abstract

Adaptive cluster sampling (ACS) has the potential of being superior for sampling rare and geographically clustered populations. However, setting up an efficient ACS design is challenging. In this study, two adaptive plot designs are proposed as alternatives: one for fixed-area plot sampling and the other for relascope sampling (also known as variable radius plot sampling). Neither includes a neighborhood search which makes them much easier to execute. They do, however, include a conditional plot expansion: at a sample point where a predefined condition is satisfied, sampling is extended to a predefined larger cluster-plot or a larger relascope plot. Design-unbiased estimators of population total and its variance are derived for each proposed design, and they are applied to ten artificial and one real tree position maps to estimate density (number of trees per ha) and basal area (the cross-sectional area of a tree stem at breast height) per hectare. The performances—in terms of relative standard error (SE%)—of the proposed designs and their non-adaptive alternatives are compared. The adaptive plot designs were superior for the clustered populations in all cases of equal sample sizes and in some cases of equal area of sample plots. However, the improvement depends on: (1) the plot size factor; (2) the critical value (the minimum number of trees triggering an expansion); (3) the subplot distance for the adapted cluster-plots, and (4) the spatial arrangement of the sampled population. For some spatial arrangements, the improvement is relatively small. The adaptive designs may be particularly attractive for sampling in rare and compactly clustered populations with critical value of 1, subplot distance equal to the diameter of initial circular plots, or plot size factor of 2.5 for an initial basal area factor of 2.

Keywords

Adaptive sampling Conditional plot expansion Forest inventory Inclusion zones Neighborhood-free plot design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

First of all, we would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial support of DFG (German Research Foundation) for the research project KL 894/10-1. The results presented in this paper are part of that project. Our sincere thanks go to Prof. Dr. Shouzheng Tang, Prof. Dr. Yuancai Lei and Dr. Guangyu Zhu for their kind support during the field work of mapping our real population. Finally, we are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for a very careful and thorough reviewing of this manuscript with valuable comments and suggestions that prompted a number of improvements.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We hereby declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acharya B, Bhattarai G, Gier Ad, Stein A (2000) Systematic adaptive cluster sampling for the assessment of rare tree species in Nepal. For Ecol Manage 137:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bitterlich W (1948) Die Winkelzählprobe. Allgemeine Forst- und Holzwirtschaftliche Zeitung 59:4–5Google Scholar
  3. Brown JA (2003) Designing an efficient adaptive cluster sample. Environ Ecol Stat 10:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown JA, Manly BJF (1998) Restricted adaptive cluster sampling. Environ Ecol Stat 5:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JA, Salehi MM, Moradi M, Bell G, Smith DR (2008) An adaptive two-stage sequential design for sampling rare and clustered populations. Popul Ecol 50:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao Y, Williams DD, Williams NE (1998) How important are rare species in aquatic community ecology and bioassessment? Limmol Oceanogr 43:1403–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christman MC, Lan F (2001) Inverse adaptive cluster sampling. Biometrics 57:1096–1105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Christman MC, Pontius JS (2000) Bootstrap confidence intervals for adaptive cluster sampling. Biometrics 56:503–510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dryver AL, Chao C-T (2007) Ratio estimators in adaptive cluster sampling. Environmetrics 18:607–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dryver AL, Thompson SK (2005) Improved unbiased estimators in adaptive cluster sampling. J R Stat Soc B 67:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards TC, Cutler DR, Zimmermann NE, Geiser L, Alegria J (2005) Model-based stratifications for enhancing the detection of rare ecological events : The statistics of rarity. Ecological Society of America, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Fehrmann L, Gregoire T, Kleinn C (2012) Triangulation based inclusion probabilities: a design-unbiased sampling approach. Environ Ecol Stat 19:107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Félix-Medina MH, Thompson SK (2004) Adaptive cluster double sampling. Biometrika 91:877–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferretti M (2013) Chapter 1—forest monitoring: an introduction. In: Marco F, Richard F (eds) Developments in environmental science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  15. FRA (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010: main report, FAOGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregoire TG (1982) The unbiasedness of the mirage correction procedure for boundary overlap. Forest Sci 28:504–508Google Scholar
  17. Gregoire TG, Valentine HT (2008) Sampling strategies for natural resources and the environment. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  18. Grosenbaugh LR (1952) Plotless timber estimates-new, fast, easy. J Forest 50:32–37Google Scholar
  19. Husch B, Miller CI, Beers TW (1982) Forest mensuration. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Kleinn C, Vilčko F (2006) Design-unbiased estimation for point-to-tree distance sampling. Can J For Res 36:1407–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magnussen S, Werner K, Leckie DG, Paradine D (2005) Adaptive cluster sampling for estimation of deforestation rates. Eur J For Res 124(3): 207–220Google Scholar
  22. Magurran AE, Henderson PA (2003) Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature 422:714–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Matérn B (1986) Spatial variation, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Phillipi T (2005) Adaptive cluster sampling for estimation of abundances within local populations of low-abundance plants. Ecology 86:1091–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raphael MG, Molina R (2007) Conservation of rare or little-known species: biological, social, and economic considerations. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Roesch FA Jr (1993) Adaptive cluster sampling for forest inventories. For Sci 39:655–669Google Scholar
  27. Roesch FA Jr, Green EJ, Scott CT (1993) An alternative view of forest sampling. Survey Methodol 19:199–204Google Scholar
  28. Salehi MM, Seber GAF (2005) Two-stage sequential sampling: a neighborhood-free adaptive sampling procedure. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 10(1):84–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith DR, Brown JA, LO NCH (2004) Application of adaptive sampling to biological populations. In: Thompson WL (ed) Sampling rare or elusive species:concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters. Island Press, Covelo, pp 75–122Google Scholar
  30. Smith DR, Villella RF, Lemarié DP (2003) Application of adaptive cluster sampling to low-density populations of freshwater mussels. Environ Ecol Stat 10:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stevens Jr. DL (2006) Edge effect. In: Encyclopedia of environmetrics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Talvitie M, Leino O, Holopainen M (2006) Inventory of sparse forest populations using adaptive cluster sampling. Silva Fennica 40:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thompson SK (1990) Adaptive cluster sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 85:1050–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson SK (1991) Stratified adaptive cluster sampling. Biometrika 78:389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson SK (2006) Adaptive web sampling. Biometrics 62:1224–1234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Thompson SK, Seber GAF (1996) Adaptive sampling. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson SK (2013) Adaptive web sampling in ecology. Stat Methods Appl 22:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tout J (2009) An analysis of the adaptive cluster sampling design with rare plant point distributions. Humboldt State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang H (2011) New adaptive plot designs for sampling rare and clustered populations. George-August-Universtiy GoettingenGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang H, Kleinn C, Fehrmann L, Tang S, Magnussen S (2011) A new design for sampling with adaptive sample plots. Environ Ecol Stat 18:223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haijun Yang
    • 1
  • Steen Magnussen
    • 2
  • Lutz Fehrmann
    • 1
  • Philip Mundhenk
    • 1
  • Christoph Kleinn
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Inventory and Remote SensingGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest ServicePacific Forestry CentreVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations