Advertisement

Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 143–159 | Cite as

CircSiZer: an exploratory tool for circular data

  • María OliveiraEmail author
  • Rosa M. Crujeiras
  • Alberto Rodríguez-Casal
Article

Abstract

Smoothing methods and SiZer (SIgnificant ZERo crossing of the derivatives) are useful tools for exploring significant underlying structures in data samples. An extension of SiZer to circular data, namely CircSiZer, is introduced. Based on scale-space ideas, CircSiZer presents a graphical device to assess which observed features are statistically significant, both for density and regression analysis with circular data. The method is intended for analyzing the behavior of wind direction in the atlantic coast of Galicia (NW Spain) and how it has an influence over wind speed. The performance of CircSiZer is also checked with some simulated examples.

Keywords

Circular data CircSiZer Nonparametric estimation Wind pattern 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by Project MTM2008-03010 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, and by the IAP network StUDyS (Developing crucial Statistical methods for Understanding major complex Dynamic Systems in natural, biomedical and social sciences), from Belgian Science Policy. We also acknowledge the advice of José A. Crujeiras, an experienced skipper working in the Galician coast.

Supplementary material

10651_2013_249_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (29 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 29 KB)

References

  1. Bhattacharya S, SenGupta A (2009) Bayesian analysis of semiparametric linear-circular models. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 14:33–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaudhuri P, Marron JS (1999) SiZer for exploration of structures in curves. J Am Stat Assoc 94:807–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Di Marzio M, Panzera A, Taylor CC (2009) Local polynomial regression for circular predictors. Stat Prob Lett 79:2066–2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. George BJ, Ghosh K (2006) A semiparametric Bayesian model for circular-linear regression. Commun Stat Simul Comput 35:911–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall P, Watson GP, Cabrera J (1987) Kernel density estimation for spherical data. Biometrika 74:751–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jammalamadaka SR, SenGupta A (2001) Topics in circular statistics. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones MC, Pewsey A (2012) Inverse Batschelet distributions for circular data. Biometrics 68:183–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li R, Marron JS (2005) Local likelihood SiZer map. Sankyha Indian J Stat 67:476–498Google Scholar
  10. Marron JS, de Uña Álvarez J (2004) SiZer for length biased, censored density and hazard estimation. J Stat Plan Inference 121:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marron JS, Zhang JT (2005) SiZer for smoothing splines. Comput Stat 20:481–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oliveira M, Crujeiras RM, Rodríguez-Casal A (2012) A plug-in rule for bandwidth selection in circular density estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:3898–3908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oliveira M, Crujeiras RM, Rodríguez-Casal A (2013) Nonparametric circular methods for exploring environmental data. Environ Ecol Stat 20:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  15. Rydén J (2010) Exploring possibly increasing trend of hurricane activity by a SiZer approach. Environ Ecol Stat 17:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rondonotti V, Marron JS, Park C (2007) SiZer for time series: a new approach to the analysis of trends. Electron J Stat 1:268–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rudge JF (2008) Finding peaks in geochemical distributions: a re-examination of the helium-continental crust correlation. Earth Planet Sci Lett 274:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. SenGupta A, Ugwuowo FI (2006) Assymetric circular-linear multivariate regression models with applications to environmental data. Environ Ecol Stat 13:299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skrøvseth SO, Bellika JG, Godtliebsen F (2012) Causality in scale space as an approach to change detection. PLoS ONE 7:e52253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052253 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sonderegger D, Wang H, William C, Noon B (2009) Using SiZer to detect thresholds in ecological data. Front Ecol Environ 7:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sousa MC, Alvarez I, Vaz N, Gomez-Gesteira M, Dias JM (2013) Assessment of wind pattern accuracy from the QuikSCAT satellite and the WRF model along the Galician coast (Northwest Iberian Peninsula). Mon Weather Rev 141:742–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wasserman L (2006) All of nonparametric statistics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Oliveira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rosa M. Crujeiras
    • 1
  • Alberto Rodríguez-Casal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Operations ResearchUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaGaliciaSpain

Personalised recommendations