Assessing area-specific relative risks from large forest fire size in Canada
- 206 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The evaluation of area-specific risks for large fires is of great policy relevance to fire management and prevention. When analyzing data for the burned areas of large fires in Canada, we found that there are dramatic patterns that cannot be adequately modelled by traditional hierarchical modelling assuming spatial autocorrelation. In this paper, we use the robust locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) technique to remove spatial and temporal trends; and we account for periodical cycles by employing the relevant periodic functions as covariates in a hierarchical Gamma mixed effects model. Based on the results of this generalized multilevel analysis of large fire size, we provide an area-specific relative risks ranking system for Canada and confirm that lightning tends to cause more severe damage in terms of fire size than human factor. A diagnostic check on the modelling shows that large fires data are reasonably modelled using this combination of semiparametric and mixed effects modelling approaches.
Keywords
Clustered data Large size fires Generalized linear mixed models Seasonal effects Spatial analysisPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Cumming SG (2001) A parametric model of the fire-size distribution. Can J For Res 31: 1297–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ha I.D., Lee Y (2005) Comparison of hierarchical likelihood versus orthodox best linear unbiased predictor approaches for frailty models. Biometrika 92: 717–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized Additive Models. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Ma R (1999) An orthodox blup approach to generalized linear mixed models. PhD thesis, Department of Statistics, The University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
- Ma R, Jørgensen B (2007) Nested generalized linear mixed models: an orthodox best linear unbiased predictor approach. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 69: 625–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ma R, Krewski D, Burnett RT (2003) Random effects cox models: a poisson modelling approach. Biometrika 90: 157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mendes JM, de Zea Bermudez P, Pereira J, Turkman KF (2010) Spatial extremes of wildfire sizes: Bayesian hierarchical models for extremes. Environ Ecol Stat 17: 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Podur JJ, Martell DL, Stanford D (2010) A compound poisson model for the annual area burned by forest fires in the province of ontario. Environmetrics 21: 457–469Google Scholar
- Schoenberg FP, Peng R, Woods J (2003) On the distribution of wildfire sizes. Environmetrics 14: 583–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Speckman P (1988) Kernel smoothing in partial linear models. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 50(3): 413–436Google Scholar
- Stocks B, Mason J, Todd J, Bosch E, Wotton B, Amiro B, Flannigan M, Hirsch K, Logan K, Martell D, Skinner W (2002) Large forest fires in canada, 1959–1997. J Geophys Res. doi: 10.1029/2001JD000484
- Turner R (2009) Point patterns of forest fire locations. Environ Ecol Stat 16: 197–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vere-Jones D (2009) Some models and procedures for space-time point processes. Environ Ecol Stat 16: 173–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Woolford DG, Cao J, Dean CB, Martell DL (2010) Characterizing temporal changes in forest fire ignitions: looking for climate change signals in a region of the canadian boreal forest. Environmetrics 21: 789–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zeger SL (1988) A regression model for time series of counts. Biometrika 75: 621–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar