Advertisement

Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 107–123 | Cite as

Triangulation based inclusion probabilities: a design-unbiased sampling approach

  • Lutz Fehrmann
  • Timothy G. Gregoire
  • Christoph Kleinn
Open Access
Article

Abstract

A probabilistic sampling approach for design-unbiased estimation of area-related quantitative characteristics of spatially dispersed population units is proposed. The developed field protocol includes a fixed number of 3 units per sampling location and is based on partial triangulations over their natural neighbors to derive the individual inclusion probabilities. The performance of the proposed design is tested in comparison to fixed area sample plots in a simulation with two forest stands. Evaluation is based on a general approach for areal sampling in which all characteristics of the resulting population of possible samples is derived analytically by means of a complete tessellation of the areal sampling frame. The example simulation shows promising results. Expected errors under this design are comparable to sample plots including a much greater number of trees per plot.

Keywords

Design based inference Inclusion probability Delaunay Triangulation Plot design Continuous population 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the German Research Foundation DFG (KL 894/ 13-1). We thank Sebastian Schnell for helpful methodological and technical discussions. Further we thank two anonymous reviewers. Their extensive contributions to formulate the idea was substantial. We appreciated constructive comments, help and valuable suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Affleck D, Gregoire T, Valentine H (2005) Design unbiased estimation in line intersect sampling using segmented transects. Environ Ecol Stat 12(2): 139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aurenhammer F (1991) Voronoi diagrams–a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM Comput Surv 23(3): 345–405. doi: 10.1145/116873.116880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barabesi L (2001) A design-based approach to the estimation of plant density using point-to-plant sampling. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 6(1): 89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barabesi L, Franceschi S (2010) Sampling properties of spatial total estimators under tessellation stratified designs. Environmetrics. doi: 10.1002/env.1046
  5. Batcheler CL (1971) Estimation of density from a sample of joint point and nearest-neighbor distances. Ecology 52(4): 703–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35(4): 445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cochran WG (1977) Sampling Techniques. Whiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Condit R (1998) Tropical Forest Census Plots. Springer and R. G. Landes Company, Berlin, Germany, and Georgetown, TexasGoogle Scholar
  9. Cottam G, Curtis JT (1956) The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37(3): 451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox TF (1976) The robust estimation of the density of a forest stand using a new conditioned distance method. Biometrika 63(3): 493–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delincé J (1986) Robust density-estimation through distance measurements. Ecology 67(6): 1576–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eberhardt LL (1967) Some developments in ‘distance sampling’. Biometrics 23: 207–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engeman RM, Sugihara RT, Pank LF, Dusenberry WE (1994) A comparison of plotless density estimators using monte carlo simulation. Ecology 75(6): 1769–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engeman RM, Nielson RM, Sugihara RT (2005) Evaluation of optimized variable area transect sampling using totally enumerated field data sets. Environmetrics 16(7): 767–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Errico D (1981) Some methods of sampling triangle based probability polygons for forestry applications. Master’s thesis, Department of forestry, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraser A (1977) Triangle-based probability polygons for forest sampling. For Sci 23: 111–121Google Scholar
  17. Gregoire T (1998) Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling: appreciating the difference. Can J For Res 28(10): 1429–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gregoire TG, Valentine HT (2008) Sampling strategies for natural resources and the environment. Applied environmental statistics. Chapman Hall/CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Halls PJ, Bulling M, White PCL, Garland L, Harris S (2001) Dirichlet neighbours: revisiting dirichlet tessellation for neighbourhood analysis. Comput Environ Urban Syst 25(1): 105–117. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00035-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hubbel S, Foster R, O’Brian S, Harms K, Condit R, Wechsler B, Wright S, de Lao L (1999) Light gap disturbance, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest. Science 283: 554–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kleinn C, Vilčko F (2006a) Design-unbiased estimation for point-to-tree distance sampling. Can J For Res 36: 1407–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kleinn C, Vilčko F (2006b) A new empirical approach for estimation in k-tree sampling. For Ecol Manag 237: 522–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kronenfeld BJ (2009) A plotless density estimator based on the asymptotic limit of ordered distance estimation values. For Sci 55(4): 283–292Google Scholar
  24. Law R, Illian J, Burslem D, Gratzer G, Gunatilleke CVS, Gunatilleke IAUN (2009) Ecological information from spatial patterns of plants: insights from point process theory. J Ecol 97: 616–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lessard VC, Drummer TD, Reed DD (2002) Precision of density estimates from fixed-radius plots compared to n-tree distance sampling. For Sci 48(1): 1–6Google Scholar
  26. Lowell KE (1997) An empirical evaluation of spatially based forest inventory samples. Can J For Res 27: 352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynch T, Wittwer R (2003) n-Tree distance sampling for per-tree estimates with application to unequal-sized cluster sampling of increment core data. Can J For Res 33(7): 1189–1195. doi: 10.1139/X03-036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lynch TB, Rusydi R (1999) Distance sampling for forest inventory in indonesian teak plantations. For Ecol Manag 113: 215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magnussen S, Kleinn C, Picard N (2008a) Two new density estimators for distance sampling. Eur J For Res 127(3): 213–224. doi: 10.1007/s10342-007-0197-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Magnussen S, Picard N, Kleinn C (2008b) A Gamma-Poisson distribution of point to k nearest event distance. For Sci 54(4): 429–441Google Scholar
  31. Mandallaz D (1991) A unified approach to sampling theory for forest inventory based on infinite population models. Phd thesis, ETH ZürichGoogle Scholar
  32. McIntire EJB, Fajardo A (2009) Beyond description: the active and effective way to infer processes from spatial patterns. Ecology 90(1): 46–56. doi: 10.1890/07-2096.1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielson RM, Sugihara RT, Boardman TJ, Engeman RM (2004) Optimization of ordered distance sampling. Environmetrics 15(2): 119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nothdurft A, Saborowski J, Nuske R, Stoyan D (2010) Density estimation based on k-tree sampling and point pattern reconstruction. Can J For Res 40: 953–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K, Chiu SN (1999) Spatial tesselations. concepts and applications of voronoi diagrams. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, New yorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Payandeh B, Ek A (1986) Distance methods and density estimators. Can J For Res 16(5): 918–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Picard N, Kouyate A, Dessard H (2005) Tree density estimations using a distance method in mali savanna. For Sci 51(1): 7–18Google Scholar
  38. Prodan M (1968) Punktstichprobe für die Forsteinrichtung. Forst und Holzwirt 23(11): 225–226Google Scholar
  39. Ripley BD (1977) Modelling spatial patterns. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 39(2): 172–212Google Scholar
  40. Roesch FA, Green EJ, Scott CT (1993) An alternative view of forest sampling. Surv Methodol 19(2): 199–204Google Scholar
  41. Särndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J (1992) Model assisted survey sampling. Springer, New York, p 694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sibson R (1980) The dirichlet tessellation as an aid in data analysis. Scand J Stat 7(1): 14–20Google Scholar
  43. Staupendahl K (2008) The modified six-tree-sample—a suitable method for forest stand assessment. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung 179(2–3): 21–33Google Scholar
  44. Steinke I, Hennenberg K (2006) On the power of plotless density estimators for statistical comparisons of plant populations. Can J Bot 84(3): 421–432. doi: 10.1139/B05-135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thompson HR (1956) Distribution of distance to nth neighbor in a population of randomly distributed individuals. Ecology 37(2): 391–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ward D (1991) Triangular tesselation: a new approach to forest inventory. For Ecol Manag 44: 285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White N, Engeman R, Sugihara R, Krupa H (2008) A comparison of plotless density estimators using monte carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets. BMC Ecol 8(1): 6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-8-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams MS (2001) New approach to areal sampling in ecological surveys. For Ecol Manag 154: 11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lutz Fehrmann
    • 1
  • Timothy G. Gregoire
    • 2
  • Christoph Kleinn
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Forest Inventory and Remote SensingGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Yale School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations