Advertisement

Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 111–142 | Cite as

Components of information for multiple resolution comparison between maps that share a real variable

  • Robert Gilmore PontiusJrEmail author
  • Olufunmilayo Thontteh
  • Hao Chen
Article

Abstract

This paper presents quantitative methods that allow scientists to compare the patterns in two maps that show a shared real variable. Specifically, this paper shows how to budget various components of agreement and disagreement between maps. The components are based on the separation of a map’s information of quantity from its information of location. The technique also examines how variation in resolution influences the measurement of the components of information. The manner in which the measurements change as a function of spatial resolution can be more important and interesting than the results at any single particular resolution, because the results at a single particular resolution may indicate more about the format of the data than about the overall pattern in the landscape. An example illustrates the mathematical concepts, and an application compares mapped vegetation indices in Africa to illustrate the usefulness of the proposed approach vis-à-vis a conventional approach. The results are presented visually in the form of stacked bar graphs that show separable components of information. The entire analysis is performed twice, each time with a different mathematical measurement of deviation: (1) root mean square error, and (2) mean absolute error. This paper compares these two approaches and discusses their relative advantages and disadvantages. Hopefully, this approach of budgeting components of information at multiple resolutions will become adopted as standard practice in the measurement of patterns.

Keywords

Accuracy Error MAE Raster Scale RMSE 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  2. Gaile G and Willmott CJ (eds) (1984). Spatial statistics and models. D Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht Google Scholar
  3. McMaster RB and Usery EL (eds) (2004). A research agenda for geographic information science. CRC Press, Boca Raton Google Scholar
  4. Openshaw S (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. GeoBooks, Norwich Google Scholar
  5. Pontius RG Jr (2000). Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 66(8): 1011–1016 Google Scholar
  6. Pontius RG Jr (2002). Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 68(10): 1041–1049 Google Scholar
  7. Pontius RG Jr and Suedmeyer B (2004). Components of agreement in categorical maps at multiple resolutions. In: Lunetta, RS and Lyon, JG (eds) Remote sensing and GIS accuracy assessment, pp 233–251. CRC Press, Boca Raton Google Scholar
  8. Pontius RG Jr, Huffaker D and Denman K (2004). Useful techniques of validation for spatially-explicit land change models. Ecol Model 179(4): 445–461 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Unwin DJ (1996). GIS, spatial analysis and spatial statistics. Prog Hum Geogr 20(4): 540–551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Veldkamp A, Verburg PH, Kok K, Koning GHJde, Priess J and Bergsma AR (2001). The need for scale sensitive approaches in spatially explicit land use change modeling. Environ Model Assess 6: 111–121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Willmott CJ (1981). On the validation of models. Phys Geogr 2(2): 184–194 Google Scholar
  12. Willmott CJ (1982). Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63(11): 1309–1313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Willmott CJ, Ackleson SG, Davis RE, Feddema JJ, Klink KM, Legates DR, O’Donnell J and Rowe CM (1985). Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. J Geophys Res 900(C5): 8995–9005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Gilmore PontiusJr
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Olufunmilayo Thontteh
    • 2
  • Hao Chen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of International Development, Community, and EnvironmentClark UniversityWorcesterUSA
  2. 2.Regional Center for Training in Aerospace Surveys (RECTAS)IIe-IfeNigeria
  3. 3.School of GeographyClark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations