Hidden competence: women’s mathematical participation in public and private classroom spaces
- 225 Downloads
This paper reports on gender and participation in one inquiry-oriented undergraduate mathematics course. While there is evidence that inquiry can better support all learners, especially women, less is known about the distribution of participation in inquiry classrooms. Here, we focus on how men and women participated in both public spaces (in plenary with the whole class) and private spaces (with their group members). We found that while many women provided a large number of high-level “why” contributions in their groups, this did not necessary translate to participation in plenary discussions. We thus argue that women’s competence was hidden to the whole class, which contributes to the systematic marginalization of women in mathematics.
KeywordsEquity Gender Discourse Classroom participation
- Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 171–200). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
- Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249–254.Google Scholar
- Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory into practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Daro, P. (2019). The 5x8 card. Retrieved February 8, 2019, from https://math.serpmedia.org/5x8card/.
- Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M. M., & Hunsinger, M. (2015). Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 4988–4993. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422822112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L. M., Oslund, J. A., Parks, A. N., & Wood, M. B. (2011). Smarter together! Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Brisson, B. M., Häfner, I., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Fostering adolescents’ value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Houssart, J. (2001). Rival classroom discourses and inquiry mathematics: “The whisperers”. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(3), 2–8.Google Scholar
- Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.595881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leder, G. C. (2015). Gender and mathematics education revisited. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 145–170). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Leyva, L. A. (2017). Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: A review of research on gender in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 397–433. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.4.0397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lubienski, S. T., & Ganley, C. M. (2017). Research on gender and mathematics. In J. Cai (Ed.), First compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 649–666). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- Masanja, V. G. (2010). Increasing women’s participation in science, mathematics and technology education and employment in Africa. In United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women: Expert group meeting: Gender, science, and technology. Butare, Huye, Rwanda: National University of Rwanda & University of Dar es Salaam.Google Scholar
- Mathematical Association of America. (2018). Instructional practices guide. Retrieved from https://www.dropbox.com/s/42oiptp46i0g2w2/MAA_IP_Guide_V1-2.pdf?dl=0. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
- McAfee, M. (2014). The kinesiology of race. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 468–491. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.u3ug18060x847412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematics success for all. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
- National Science Board. (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators (NSB-2018-1). Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
- Pierce, C. (1970). Offensive mechanisms. In F. B. Barbour (Ed.), The Black 70’s (pp. 265–282). Boston, MA: Porter Sargent.Google Scholar
- Reinholz, D. L., Bradfield, K., & Apkarian, N. (2019). Using analytics to support instructor reflection on student participation in a discourse-focused undergraduate mathematics classroom. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education., 5, 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00084-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sadker, D., Sadker, M., & Zittleman, K. R. (2009). Still failing at fairness: How gender bias cheats girls and boys in school and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Sax, L. J., Kanny, M. A., Riggers-Piehl, T. A., Whang, H., & Paulson, L. N. (2015). “But I’m not good at math”: The changing salience of mathematical self-concept in shaping women’s and men’s STEM aspirations. Research in Higher Education, 56(8), 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9375-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences (Vol. 12). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Shah, N. (2017). Race, ideology, and academic ability: A relational analysis of racial narratives in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 119(7), 1–42.Google Scholar
- Sharpe, D. (2015). Your chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(8), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=20&n=8
- Staats, C., Capatosto, K., Wright, R. A., & Jackson, V. W. (2016). State of the science: Implicit bias review 2016. Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://kirwaninstitute.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/implicit-bias-2016.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
- Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..Google Scholar
- Sumpter, L. (2016a). ‘Boys press all the buttons and hope it will help’: Upper secondary school teachers’ gendered conceptions about students’ mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(8), 1535–1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9660-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walkerdine, V. (1998). Counting girls out: Girls and mathematics. London, UK: Falmer Press.Google Scholar