Advertisement

Guided notes for university mathematics and their impact on students’ note-taking behaviour

  • Paola IannoneEmail author
  • Dominic Miller
Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

This paper reports findings from a case study of the impact that teaching using guided notes has on university mathematics students’ note-taking behaviour. Whereas previous research indicates that students do not appreciate the importance of lecturers’ non-written comments and record in their notes only what is written on the board when taught with the traditional chalk and talk method, some students in our study recorded the non-written comments as well as some of their own links between sections of the lecture. We did not, however, find students’ attitude towards those comments to be different from what previous research found. We conclude that guided notes can be an appropriate way of teaching university mathematics but on their own cannot make the pedagogical intentions of the lecturer clearer to the students. We also found that the educational environment plays a big part for all aspects of student learning, including decisions related to note-taking during lectures.

Keywords

Mathematics teaching University Guided notes Note-taking 

Notes

References

  1. Artemeva, N., & Fox, J. (2011). The writing’s on the board: The global and the local in teaching undergraduate mathematics through chalk talk. Written Communication, 28(4), 345–379.Google Scholar
  2. Arvanitakis, J. (2014). Massification and the large lecture theatre: from panic to excitement. Higher Education, 67(6), 735–745.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J. L., Lee, M., & Carr, J. P. (2004). The effects of guided notes on undergraduate students’ recording of lecture notes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(4), 314.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, J. L., Lee, M. G., Thibeault, M. D., Carr, J. E., & Bailey, J. S. (2002). Effects of guided notes on university students’ responding and recall of information. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11(4), 243–254.Google Scholar
  5. Cardetti, F., Khamsemanan, N., & Orgnero, M. C. (2010). Insights regarding the usefulness of partial notes in mathematics courses. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10, 80–92.Google Scholar
  6. Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 522.Google Scholar
  7. Fukawa-Connelly, T., Weber, K., & Mejía-ramos, J.P. (2017). Informal content and student note-taking in advanced mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(5), 567– 579.Google Scholar
  8. Fukawa-Connelly, T. P. (2012). A case study of one instructor’s lecture-based teaching of proof in abstract algebra: making sense of her pedagogical moves. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 325–345.Google Scholar
  9. Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006). Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: Can formative assessment make a difference? Educational Studies, 32(4), 399–409.Google Scholar
  10. Greiffenhagen, C. (2014). The materiality of mathematics: Presenting mathematics at the blackboard. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 502–528.Google Scholar
  11. Halmos, P. R. (1994). What is teaching? The American Mathematical Monthly, 101(9), 848–854.Google Scholar
  12. Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 169–207.Google Scholar
  13. Iannone, P., & Nardi, E. (2005). On the pedagogical insight of mathematicians: Interaction and transition from the concrete to the abstract. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(2), 191–215.Google Scholar
  14. Jaworski, B., Mali, A., & Petropoulou, G. (2017). Critical theorising from studies of undergraduate mathematics teaching for students’ meaning making in mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 168–197.Google Scholar
  15. Kiewra, K. A. (1985a). Providing the instructor’s notes: An effective addition to student notetaking. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 33–39.Google Scholar
  16. Kiewra, K. A. (1985b). Students’ note-taking behaviors and the efficacy of providing the instructor’s notes for review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10(4), 378–386.Google Scholar
  17. Konrad, M., Joseph, L. M., & Eveleigh, E. (2009). A meta-analytic review of guided notes. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(3), 421–444.Google Scholar
  18. Lai, Y., & Weber, K. (2014). Factors mathematicians profess to consider when presenting pedagogical proofs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 93–108.Google Scholar
  19. Larwin, K. H., & Larwin, D. A. (2013). The impact of guided notes on postsecondary student achievement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
  20. Lew, K., Fukawa-Connelly, T. P., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2016). Lectures in advanced mathematics: Why students might not understand what the mathematics professor is trying to convey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 162–198.Google Scholar
  21. Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861–878.Google Scholar
  22. Lynch, K. (2006). Neo-liberalism and marketisation: The implications for higher education. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  23. Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287.Google Scholar
  24. Nardi, E., Jaworski, B., & Hegedus, S. (2005). A spectrum of pedagogical awareness for undergraduate mathematics: From tricks to techniques. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(4), 284–316.Google Scholar
  25. Narjaikaew, P., Emarat, N., & Cowie, B. (2009). The effect of guided note-taking during lectures on Thai university students’ understanding of electromagnetism. Research in Science Technological Education, 27(1), 75–94.Google Scholar
  26. Rasmussen, C., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 189–194.Google Scholar
  27. Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Segers, M., Nijhuis, J., & Gijselaers, W. (2006). Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: The influence on students’ perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(3), 223–242.Google Scholar
  29. Speer, N. M., Smith, J. P., & Horvath, A. (2010). Collegiate mathematics teaching: An unexamined practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(2), 99–114.Google Scholar
  30. Suritsky, S. K., & Hughes, C. A. (1991). Benefits of notetaking: Implications for secondary and postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(1), 7–18.Google Scholar
  31. Weber, K. (2004). Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: A case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(2), 115–133.Google Scholar
  32. Williams, R. L., & Eggert, A. C. (2002). Notetaking in college classes: Student patterns and instructional strategies. The Journal of General Education, 51(3), 173–199.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics Education CentreLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations