Affecting the flow of a proof by creating presence—a case study in Number Theory
- 587 Downloads
The notion of flow of a proof encapsulates mathematical, didactical, and contextual aspects of proof presentation. A proof may have different flows, depending on the lecturer’s choices regarding its presentation. Adopting Perelman’s New Rhetoric (PNR) as a theoretical framework, we designed methods to assess aspects of the flow of a proof. We present a case study from a Number Theory class at the beginning undergraduate level, focusing on an intervention concerning one lesson given in two consecutive years. The intervention consisted of a discussion with the lecturer about findings from Year-1 and potential changes in the flow of the proof before the Year-2 lesson. We analyze two aspects of the flow of the proof: the scope and organization of the argumentation and the presence (in the PNR sense) of different elements. Our analysis revealed that the intervention caused global and local changes in the flow and that PNR enables us to capture these changes.
KeywordsProof teaching Flow of proof Perelman’s New Rhetoric Mathematical argumentation Creating presence
We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for encouraging us and helping us to situate our study in the wider research landscape.
- Gabel, M., & Dreyfus, T. (2013). The flow of a proof—The example of the Euclidean algorithm. In M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 321–328). Kiel, Germany: PME.Google Scholar
- Grundey, S. (2014). Beweisvorstellungen und eigenständiges Beweisen: Entwicklung und vergleichend empirische Untersuchung eines Unterrichtskonzepts am Ende der Sekundarstufe. Wiesbaden: Springer, Fachmedien, Perspektiven der Mathematikdidaktik.Google Scholar
- Mejia-Ramos, J. P., & Inglis, M. (2009). Argumentative and proving activities in mathematics education research. In F. L. Lin, F. J. Hsieh, G. Hanna, & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 Conference: Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 88–93). Taipei, Taiwan: PME.Google Scholar
- Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
- Pinto, A. (2013). Variability in university mathematics teaching: A tale of two instructors. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2416–2425). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
- Roy, S., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2010). Undergraduates’ proof comprehension: A comparative study of three forms of proof presentation. Retrieved from http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/crume2010/Archive/Roy%20et%20al.pdf
- Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Weber, K., Hanna, G., Harel, G., Kidron, I., Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2013). Justification and proof in mathematics and mathematics education. In M. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics and mathematics education: Searching for common ground (pp. 237–257). Springer: Advances in Mathematics Education series.Google Scholar