Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 91, Issue 1, pp 55–71 | Cite as

“I can actually be very feminine here”: contradiction and hybridity in becoming a female mathematician

Article
First Online:

Abstract

A common theme in accounts of choosing mathematics is that of persistence in the face of troubles or difficulties which are often associated with the structuring effects of gender, class, culture and ethnicity. Centring on an analysis of one woman’s account of becoming a mathematician, we build on our understanding of multiple and developing identities with the aim of capturing the nature of individual challenge to structuring discourses and its implications for choice and participation in mathematics more generally. Inspecting how she talks about events in the past, present, and future, we expand on Leont’ev’s (1978, 1981) notion of leading activity to explore how we organise and prioritise activities (and their related identities) within the context of Holland et al.’s (1998) theory of identity in practice, hybridity and world-making. We interrogate the part played by contradiction in creating a space for individual agency through its resolution in hybrid practices and its relation to social change, exploring how our informant narrates taking up mathematics “against the odds” as part of an ongoing process of “re-writing” herself into new imagined worlds. In providing an insight into how one individual envisages and enacts a different mathematics culture in which she can have a place, our analysis suggests ways forward in creating new, more inclusive, mathematics education.

Keywords

Gender Contradiction Hybridity Leading identity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Apple, M. W. (2012). Can education change society? New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Beach, K. (2003). Consequential transitions: A developmental view of knowledge propagation through social organisations. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 39-62). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, J. R. (1995). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In G. Kaiser & P. Rogers (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 163–174). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  7. Black, L. (2004a). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34–54.Google Scholar
  8. Black, L. (2004b). Teacher–pupil talk in whole-class discussions and processes of social positioning within the primary school classroom. Language and Education, 18(5), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, L., & Williams, J. (2013). Contradiction and conflict between “leading identities”: Becoming an engineer versus becoming a “good Muslim” woman. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  10. Black, L., Williams, J., Hernandez-Martines, P., Davis, P., & Wake, G. (2010). Developing a “Leading Identity”: The relationship between students’ mathematical identities and their career and higher education aspirations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(1), 55–72.Google Scholar
  11. Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171–200). Westport, CT: Alex.Google Scholar
  14. Forgasz, H., Becker, J. R., Lee, K.-H., & Steinthorsdottir, O. (Eds.). (2010). International perspectives on gender and mathematics education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  15. Forgasz, H., & Rivera, F. (2012). Towards equity in mathematics education: gender, culture, and diversity. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guitierrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tajeda, C. (1999). Re-thinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303.Google Scholar
  17. Gutierrez, K. (2008). Developing a socio-critical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gutiérrez, R., & Gutierrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, J. (2010). The influence of high school and university experiences on women’s pursuit of undergraduate mathematics degrees in Canada. In H. Forgasz, J. R. Becker, K.-H. Lee, & O. Steinthorsdottir (Eds.), International perspectives on gender and mathematics education (pp. 365–389). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
  21. Holland, D., & Lachicotte, W. (2007). Vygotsky, Mead and the new sociocultural studies of identity. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 101–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Joint Council for Qualifications (2013). Entry trends, gender and regional charts GCE 2013 Retrieved from http://www.jcq.org.uk/media-centre/news-releases/entry-trends-gender-regional-charts-gce-2013.
  24. Kaiser, G., & Rogers, P. (1995). Introduction: equity in mathematics education. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 1-10). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The development of mind. Retrieved from www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/development-mind.pdf.
  27. London Mathematical Society (2013). Advancing women in mathematics: Good practice in UK university departments Retrieved from http://www.blitzadv.co.uk/LMS-BTL-17Report.pdf.
  28. Mendick, H. (2005). A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing “good at maths”. Gender and Education, 17(2), 203–219.Google Scholar
  29. Mendick, H., Moreau, M.-P. & Hollingworth, S. (2008). Mathematical images and gender identities. Report for UK resource centre for women in science, engineering and technology Bradford: UKRC.Google Scholar
  30. Pais, A. (2014). Economy: The absent centre of mathematics education. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46, 1085–1093.Google Scholar
  31. Rodd, M., & Bartholomew, H. (2006). Invisible and special: Young women’s experiences as undergraduate mathematics students. Gender and Education, 18(1), 35–50.Google Scholar
  32. Skovsmose, O., & Greer, B. (2012). Opening the cage: Critique and politics of mathematics education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Solomon, Y. (2007). Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in the undergraduate mathematics community of practice? Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Solomon, Y. (2012). Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society:  The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Walls, F. (2009). Mathematical subjects: Children talk about their mathematics lives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. WISE (2012). Women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: From classroom to boardroom Retrieved from http://www.wisecampaign.org.uk/files/useruploads/files/wise_stats_document_final.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education and Social Research InstituteManchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.Manchester Institute of EducationManchester UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations