Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 89, Issue 2, pp 167–184 | Cite as

Agency and positioning in a multilingual mathematics classroom

  • Eva Norén
Article

Abstract

This paper draws on data from a first grade multilingual mathematics classroom in Sweden. I explore how students’ agency is pronounced in the classroom that actually can be a site where mathematics reform-oriented pedagogy thrives and how the emphasis on language support in such classrooms can support reform-oriented pedagogy. I argue that the emphasis on reform-oriented pedagogy can support the learning of mathematics and a second language, simultaneously. By analysing discursive practices, I show how this supportive relationship operates alongside the on-going processes of normalisation whereby students’ mother tongues continue to be erased or ignored.

Keywords

Mathematics Language-oriented Reform-oriented Foucault First grade classroom 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and Paul Andrews for providing scientific guidance in the writing of this article.

References

  1. Adler, J. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barwell, R. (2005). Integrating language and content: Issues from the mathematics classroom. Linguistics and Education, 16, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barwell, R. (2009). Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: An introductory discussion. In R. Barwell (Ed.), Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms. Global perspectives (pp. 1–13). Nort York: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  4. Björklund Boistrup, L. (2010). Assessment discourses in mathematics classrooms: A multimodal study. Published doctoral thesis. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  5. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 171–200). Westport: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Burr, V. (2003). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Civil, M. (2002). Culture and mathematics: A community approach. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarkson, P. (2007). Australian Vietnamese students learning mathematics: High ability bilinguals and their use of their languages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cotton, T., & Hardy, T. (2004). Problematizing culture and discourse for mathematics education research. Defining issues; tools for research. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education. Issues of power in theory and methodology. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 198–205.Google Scholar
  11. Cummins, J. (1996). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Ontario: California Association for Bilingual Education.Google Scholar
  12. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  13. Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, volume 2: Literacy (pp. 487–499). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Participant observation and fieldnotes. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1971). Diskursens ordning [The order of Discourse]. Stehag: Brutus Östlings förlag.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1977). History of systems of thought. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault (pp. 119–204). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. London: Harvester.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1982). After the word: the subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. London: The Harvester.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (2003). In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ganuza, N., & Hedman, C. (2015). Struggles for legitimacy in mother tongue instruction in Sweden. Language and Education, 29(2), 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gruber, S. (2007). Skolan gör skillnad: Etnicitet och institutionell praktik. [School makes a difference: Ethnicity and institutional practice]. Published doctoral thesis. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.Google Scholar
  24. Haglund, C. (2005). Social interaction and identification among adolescents in multilingual suburban Sweden—A study of institutional order and sociocultural change. Published doctoral thesis. Stockholm: Centre for research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  25. Hajer, M. (2003). Språkutvecklande ämnesundervisning—ett andraspråksperspektiv i alla ämnen [Language Developing subject teaching—a second language perspective in all subjects]. Symposium 2003—Arena andraspråk [Symposium 2003—Arena second language]. Nationellt centrum för svenska som andra språk. Stockholm: HLS Förlag.Google Scholar
  26. Hardy, T. (2004). “There’s no hiding place”: Foucault’s notion of normalization at work in a mathematics lesson. In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the Postmodern. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Johansson, M. (2006). Teaching Mathematics with textbooks: A classroom and curricular perspective. Published doctoral thesis. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, D. V. (2000). Talk and texts in bilingual mathematics lessons in Wales. The Welsh Journal of Education, 9(2), 102–119.Google Scholar
  29. Khisty, L. L. (1995). Issues of language and meanings in mathematics teaching with Hispanic students. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 279–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kling-Sackerud, L-A. (2009). Elevers möjligheter att ta ansvar för sitt lärande i matematik: En skolstudie i postmodern tid. [Pupils’ ability to take responsibility for their learning in mathematics: A school study in postmodern times.] Published doctoral thesis. Umeå: Teknisk- naturvetenskaplig fakultet, Matematik, teknik och naturvetenskap. Umeå University.Google Scholar
  31. León Rosales, R. (2010). Vid framtidens hitersta gräns—om maskulina elevpositioner i en multietnisk skola [At tomorrow’s closest limit—on masculine pupil positions in a multi-ethnic school]. Published doctoral thesis. Tumba: Mångkulturellt Centrum.Google Scholar
  32. Lindberg, I. (2009). I det nya mångspråkiga Sverige [The new multilingual Sweden]. Utbildning & Demokrati [Education & Democracy], 2, 9–38.Google Scholar
  33. Meaney, T. (2004). So what’s power got to do with it? In M. Walshaw (Ed.), Mathematics education within the Postmodern (pp. 181–199). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Mellin-Olsen, S. (1987). The politics of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Moschkovich, J. (1999). Understanding the needs of Latino students in reform-oriented mathematics classrooms. In Secada, Walter G., et al (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on Latinos (pp. 5–12). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 1906 Association Drive, Reston, 20191-159.Google Scholar
  36. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2&3), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moschkovich, J. (2007a). Bilingual mathematics learners: How views of language, bilingual learners, and mathematical communication affect instruction. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 89–104). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  38. Moschkovich, J. (2007b). Using two languages when learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(2), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moschkovich, J. N. (2008). “I went by twos, he went by one”: Multiple interpretations of inscriptions as resources for mathematical discussions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(4), 551–587.Google Scholar
  40. Moschkovich, J. (2011). Methodological issues in research on language and learning mathematics. In M. Setati, T. Nkambule & L. Goosen, (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI Study 21 Conference, Mathematics and Language Diversity, Sào Paulo Brazil.Google Scholar
  41. Moschkovich, J. (2012). How equity concerns lead to attention to mathematical discourse. In B. Herbel-Eisenman, J. Chopin, D. Wagner, & D. Pimm (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education: Theories, practices, and politics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Norén, E. (2010). Flerspråkiga matematikklassrum: Diskurser i grundskolans matematikundervisning [Multilingual mathematics classrooms: Discourses in compulsory school’s mathematics teaching]. Published doctoral thesis. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
  43. Öhman, M. (2010). Analysing the direction of socialisation from a power perspective. Sport, Education and Society, 15(4), 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Otterup, T. (2005). “Jag känner mig begåvad bara.” Om flerspråkighet och identitetskonstruktion bland ungdomar i ett multietniskt förortsområde [“I just feel gifted.” About multilingualism and identity construction among adolescents in a multiethnic suburban area]. Göteborgsstudier i nordisk språkvetenskap [Gothenburg Studies in Scandinavian Linguistics]. Published doctoral thesis. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.Google Scholar
  45. Palmer, A. (2005). Matematik i förändring [Mathematics in change]. Stockholm: Master Thesis, Lärarhögskolan i [Teacher Education College in] Stockholm.Google Scholar
  46. Parszyk, I.-M. (1999). En skola för andra: Minoritetselevers upplevelser av arbets- och livsvillkor i grundskolan [A school for others: Minority Students’ experiences of working and living conditions in elementary school]. Published doctoral thesis. Stockholm: HLS Förlag, Studies in Educational Studies 17.Google Scholar
  47. Persson, E. (2007). Det smyger sig in hela tiden: om tankestilar och traditioner i utbildningen för blivande matematiklärare [It creeps into all the time: on thinking styles and traditions of training for prospective mathematics teachers]. Stockholm: Licentiat thesis, Lärarhögskolan i Stockholm.Google Scholar
  48. Pettersson, A. (1993). Den nationella utvärderingen i grundskolan våren 1992. Matematik, åk 5. Huvudrapport. Skolverkets rapport 14 [The national assessment in primary schools in spring 1992. Mathematics, Year 5. Main Report. National Agency’s Report 14]. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  49. Phillips Manke, M. (1997). Classroom power relations: Understanding student-teacher interaction. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Popkewitz, T. (1987). The formation of school subjects: The struggle for creating an American institution. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  51. Runfors, A. (2003). Mångfald, motsägelser och marginaliseringar. En studie av hur invandrarskap formas i skolan [Diversity, contradictions and marginalization: A study of how immigrant students are formed at school]. Published doctoral thesis. Stockholm: Prisma.Google Scholar
  52. Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: A critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol, 42(2), 167–199.Google Scholar
  53. Setati, M. (2008). Mathematics education and language: Policy, research and practice in multilingual contexts. Regular lecture at ICME-10. Retrieved the 10th of August 2010 www.icme10.dk/proceedings/pages/…/RL_Mamokgethi_Setati.pdf .
  54. Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between languages and discourses: Language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 243–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Setati, M, Nkambule, T., & Goosen, L. (2011). (Eds). Proceedings of the ICMI Study 21 Mathematics and Language Diversity, Sào Paulo Brazil.Google Scholar
  56. Sjögren, A. (1996). En “bra” svenska? Om språk, kultur och makt [A “good” Swedish? On language, culture and power]. Botkyrka: Mångkulturellt Centrum.Google Scholar
  57. Sjögren, A. (1997). Language and environment: A cultural approach to education for minority and migrant students. Botkyrka: Mångkulturellt Centrum.Google Scholar
  58. Skollagen. (1985). Education Act 1985:1100. Stockholm: Regeringen.Google Scholar
  59. Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (1994). Läroplan för det obligatoriska skolväsendet, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet [Curriculum for the compulsory school system, the preschool class and leisure time class]. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  60. Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (1997). Utvärdering i naturkunskap och matematik: Lärare i grundskolan berättar [Assessment in science and mathematics: Teachers’ in primary school narratives]. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  61. Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (2002). Flera språk—fler möjligheter—utveckling av modersmålsstödet och modersmålsundervisningen [Multiple languages—more options—development of language support and native language instruction]. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  62. Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (2004). Nationella Utvärderingen [National evaluation] 2003. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  63. Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (2007). Press message: the 14th of August. Andelen behöriga till gymnasieskolan är den lägsta på tio år [The proportion eligible for upper secondary school is the lowest in ten years]. Retrieved 101227: http://www.skolverket.se/sb/d/203/a/9642.
  64. Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (2009). Kursplan med Kommentarer till mål som eleverna lägst ska ha uppnått i slutet av det tredje skolåret i ämnena matematik, svenska och svenska som andraspråk [Syllabus with comments to goals that students must have attained a minimum of end of the third school year in mathematics Swedish and Swedish as a second language]. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  65. Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre 2011. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  66. Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (2012). Utökad undervisningstid i matematik. Hur en ökning av undervisningstiden kan användas för att stärka elevernas matematikkunskaper [Increased instructional time in mathematics. How an increase in instructional time can be used to strengthen students’ math skills]. Rapport 378. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  67. Skolverket [National Agency of Education]. (2013). Skolor och elever i grundskolan 2012/13 [Schools and students in compulsory school]. Table 8B. Retrieved the 27th of November 2013 at http://www.skolverket.se/statistik-och-utvardering/statistik/grundskola/skolor-och-elever.
  68. Skovsmose, O. (2001). Landscapes of investigation. ZDM, 33(4), 123–132.Google Scholar
  69. Solomon, Y. (2007). Experiencing mathematics classes: Ability grouping, gender and the selective development of participative identities. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Solomon, Y. (2008). Mathematical literacy: Developing identities of inclusion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Stathopoulou, C., & Kalabasis, F. (2007). Language and culture in mathematics education: Reflections on observing a Romany class in a Greek school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(2), 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thomas, W. P. & Collier, V. P. (2001). A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long-Term Academic Achievement. Executive Summary. Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence (CREDE). www.crede.ucsc.edu/research/llaa/1.1_final.html.
  73. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Walshaw, M. (2007). Working with Foucault in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Science EducationStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations