# Prospective teachers’ attention on geometrical tasks

- 971 Downloads
- 7 Citations

## Abstract

This study investigates early childhood prospective teachers’ attention to geometrical tasks while designing and using them in the classroom. This is explored in the context of the teaching practice of 11 prospective teachers who taught geometry in early childhood classrooms during the last semester of their university studies. The teaching practice was organized into four stages: design of a lesson plan; classroom implementation; discussion of the lesson with the school practice instructor; and self-assessment report and revision of the lesson. Analysis of data using the Teaching Triad framework (Jaworski, 1994) shows that although the prospective teachers attended to issues of mathematical challenge, sensitivity to students, and management of learning in their planning, in their actual teaching and after class reflection, their attention was focused mainly on management issues. The findings also show that prospective teachers’ attention on geometrical tasks can be developed through a process of reflection on their teaching.

## Keywords

Early childhood prospective teachers Mathematics teaching Mathematical tasks Geometry Reflection Teaching triad## References

- Ainley, J., & Luntley, M. (2007). The role of attention in expert classroom practice.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10*(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - AAMT & ECA (Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers and Early Childhood Australia). (2006).
*Position paper on early childhood mathematics*. Retrieved 28 May 2012 from http://www.aamt.edu.au/Publications-and-statements/Position-statements. - Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.),
*Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics*(pp. 83–104). Westport: Ablex.Google Scholar - Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (2011). Artefacts and utilization schemes in mathematics teacher education: Place value in early childhood education.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14*(2), 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Boaler, J. (2002). Exploring the nature of mathematical activity: Using theory, research and “working hypotheses” to broaden conceptions of mathematics knowing.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51*(1–2), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001).
*Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar - Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education.
*Teaching and Teacher Education, 5*(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Clements, D. H. (2004). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In D. H. Clements & J. Sarama (Eds.),
*Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education*(pp. 267–297). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009).
*Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach*. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14*(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chinnappan, M., & Lawson, M. J. (2005). A framework for analysis of teachers’ geometric content knowledge and geometric knowledge for teaching.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8*(3), 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Cooney, T. J. (1999). Conceptualizing teachers’ ways of knowing.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38*(1–3), 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Creswell, J. W. (1998).
*Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches*. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar - Denton, K., & West, J. (2002).
*Children’s reading and mathematics achievement in kindergarten and first grade (NCES 2002125)*. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar - Doerr, H. M. (2006). Examining the tasks of teaching when using students’ mathematical thinking.
*Educational Studies, 62*(1), 3–24.Google Scholar - EYFS (Early Years Foundation Stage in England). (2012).
*Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage*:*Setting the standards for learning*,*development and care for children from birth to five*. Retrieved 30 May 2012 from http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/guidanceandadvice/g00213120/eyfs-statutory-framework. - Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (1995). Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources of teacher presentations of the subject-matter.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29*(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Falcade, R., & Strozzi, P. (2009). Construction and representation of space in 5-year-old children. In O. A. Barbarin & B. H. Wasik (Eds.),
*Handbook of child development and early education: Research to practice*(pp. 499–520). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar - Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). Early mathematics education and how to do it. In O. A. Barbarin & B. H. Wasik (Eds.),
*Handbook of child development and early education: Research to practice*(pp. 403–428). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar - Ginsburg, H. P., Kaplan, R. G., Cannon, J., Cordero, M. I., Eisenband, J. G., Galanter, M., et al. (2006). Helping early childhood educators to teach mathematics. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.),
*Critical issues in early childhood professional development*(pp. 171–202). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar - Goodell, J. E. (2006). Using critical incident reflections: A self-study as a mathematics teacher educator.
*Journal of Mathematics Teachers Education, 9*(3), 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28*(5), 524–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39*(4), 372–400.Google Scholar - Jaworski, B. (1994).
*Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry*. London: Falmer.Google Scholar - Jaworski, B. (2002). Sensitivity and challenge in university mathematics tutorial teaching.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51*(1–2), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Levenson, E., Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2011).
*Preschool geometry: Theory, research, and practical perspectives*. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mason, J. (1998). Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention.
*Journal of Mathematics Teachers Education, 1*(3), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mason, J. (2008). Being mathematical with and in front of learners: Attention, awareness, and attitude as sources of differences between teacher educators, teachers and learners. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.),
*The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: The mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional*(Vol. 4, pp. 31–56). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar - Mewborn, D. S. (1999). Reflective thinking among preservice elementary mathematics teachers.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30*(3), 316–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Moyer, P. S. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipulatives to teach mathematics.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47*(2), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children). (2002, updated 2010).
*Early childhood mathematics*:*Promoting good beginnings*. Retrieved 4 September 2011 from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/psmath.pdf. - NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2005).
*High qualified teachers*:*A position of the national council of teachers of mathematics*. Retrieved 4 September 2011 from http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/About_NCTM/Position_Statements/qualified.pdf. - Paparistodemou, E., Noss, R., & Pratt, D. (2008). The interplay between fairness and randomness in a spatial computer game.
*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 13*(2), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Potari, D., & Jaworski, B. (2002). Tackling complexity in mathematics teaching development: Using the teaching triad as a tool for reflection and analysis.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5*(4), 351–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rowland, T., Huckstep, P., & Thwaites, A. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8*(3), 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009).
*Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children*. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar - Scherer, P., & Steinbring, H. (2007). Noticing children’s learning processes—Teachers jointly reflect on their own classroom interaction for improving mathematics teaching.
*Journal of Mathematics Teachers Education, 10*(1), 157–185.Google Scholar - Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.),
*The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education*(Vol. 2, pp. 321–354). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar - Schön, D. A. (1987).
*Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions*. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar - Scott, D., & Usher, R. (1999).
*Researching education: Data, methods and theory in educational enquiry*. London: Continuum.Google Scholar - Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.
*Educational Researcher, 15*(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Swan, M. (2007). The impact of task-based professional development on teachers’ practices and beliefs: A design research study.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10*(4–6), 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ticha, M., & Hospesova, A. (2006). Qualified pedagogical reflection as a way to improve mathematics education.
*Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9*(2), 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., & Levenson, E. (2011a). Using theories to build kindergarten teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.),
*Mathematical knowledge in teaching*(pp. 231–250). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E., & Tabach, M. (2011b). From preschool teachers’ professional development to children’s knowledge: Comparing sets.
*Journal of Mathematics Education, 14*(2), 113–131.Google Scholar - Zeichner, K. M. (1987). Preparing reflective teachers: An overview of instructional strategies which have been employed in preservice teacher education.
*International Journal of Educational Research, 11*(5), 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar