Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 83, Issue 1, pp 1–7 | Cite as

Problem-posing research in mathematics education: new questions and directions

  • Florence Mihaela SingerEmail author
  • Nerida Ellerton
  • Jinfa Cai
Article

Abstract

As an introduction to the special issue on problem posing, the paper presents a brief overview of the research done on this topic in mathematics education. Starting from this overview, the authors acknowledge important issues that need to be taken into account in the developing field of problem posing and identify new directions of research, some of which are addressed by the collection of the papers included in this volume.

Keywords

Problem posing Field of mathematics education research Problem solving Instruction 

References

  1. Brown, S., & Walter, M. (1983/2005). The art of problem posing (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Cai, J. (2005). U.S. and Chinese teachers' knowing, evaluating, and constructing representations in mathematics instruction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journal, 7(2), 135–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai, J., & Cifarelli, V. (2005). Exploring mathematical exploration: how do two college students formulate and solve their own mathematical problems? Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 27(3), 43–72.Google Scholar
  4. Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Sriraman, B. (2005). An empirical taxonomy of problem posing processes. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37(3), 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cifarelli, V., & Cai, J. (2005). The evolution of mathematical explorations in open ended problem solving situations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 302–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  8. Ellerton, N. F. (1986). Children's made-up mathematics problems—a new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellerton, N. F., & Clarkson, P. C. (1996). Language factors in mathematics teaching. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 987–1053). Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  10. English, L. D. (1998). Children's problem posing within formal and informal contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. English, L. D. (2003). Problem posing in the elementary curriculum. In F. K. Lester Jr. & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Prekindergarten—grade 6 (pp. 187–198). Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  12. Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42–53). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  13. Hadamard, J. W. (1945). Essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton: Princeton University Press (page ref. are to Dover edition, New York 1954).Google Scholar
  14. Harel, G., Koichu, B., & Manaster, A. (2006). Algebra teachers' ways of thinking characterizing the mental act of problem posing. In I. J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 241–248). Prague: Charles University.Google Scholar
  15. Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 123–147). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Kontorovich, I., Koichu, B., Leikin, R., & Berman, A. (2012). An exploratory framework for handling the complexity of mathematical problem posing in small groups. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1969). The structure of scientific revolutions. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Volume 2, no. 2. Retrieved from http://turkpsikiyatri.org/arsiv/kuhn-ssr-2nded.pdf
  18. Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution tasks as a magnifying glass for observation of mathematical creativity. In Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Seoul, Korea, 8–13 July 2007 (pp. 161–168). Seoul, Korea: The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics.Google Scholar
  19. Leung, S. S. (1997). On the role of creative thinking in problem posing. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 97(3), 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Mamona-Downs, J., & Downs, M. (2005). The identity of problem solving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nohda, N. (1995). Teaching and evaluating using “open-ended problems” in the classroom. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 27(2), 57–61.Google Scholar
  23. Ponte, J. (2007). Investigations and explorations in the mathematics classroom. ZDM, 39, 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ponte, J., & Matos, J. F. (1992). Cognitive processes and social interactions in investigation activities. In J. Ponte et al. (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving and new information technologies: Research in contexts of practice (pp. 239–254). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. A. (1977). The self and its brain: An argument for interactionism. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
  27. Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(5), 521–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (2005). Assessing students' mathematical problem posing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 129–135.Google Scholar
  30. Silver, E. A., Kilpatrick, J., & Schlesinger, B. (1990). Thinking through mathematics: Fostering inquiry and communication in mathematics classrooms. New York: The College Board.Google Scholar
  31. Silver, E. A., Mamona-Downs, J., Leung, S., & Kenney, P. A. (1996). Posing mathematical problems: an exploratory study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 293–309.Google Scholar
  32. Singer, F. M. (2007). Beyond conceptual change: Using representations to integrate domain-specific structural models in learning mathematics. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(2), 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singer, F. M. (2008). Enhancing transfer as a way to develop creativity within the dynamic structural learning. In R. Leikin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students (pp. 223–230). Tel Aviv: CET.Google Scholar
  34. Singer, F. M. (2009). The dynamic infrastructure of mind—a hypothesis and some of its applications. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 48–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singer, F. M. (2010). Children's cognitive constructions: From random trials to structures. In J. A. Jaworski (Ed.), Advances in sociology research (Vol. 6, pp. 1–35). Hauppauge: Nova.Google Scholar
  36. Singer, F. M. (2012). Boosting the young learners' creativity: Representational change as a tool to promote individual talents (plenary lecture). In The 7th International Group for Mathematical Creativity and Giftedness (MCG) International Conference Proceedings (pp. 3–26). Busan, South Korea: MCG.Google Scholar
  37. Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., Cai, J., Leung, E. (2011). Problem posing in mathematics learning and teaching: A research agenda. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Developing mathematical thinking. Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 137–166). Ankara, Turkey: PME.Google Scholar
  38. Singer, F. M., & Moscovici, H. (2008). Teaching and learning cycles in a constructivist approach to instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1613–1634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singer, F. M., Pelczer, I., & Voica, C. (2011). Problem posing and modification as a criterion of mathematical creativity. In T. Rowland & E. Swoboda (Eds.) Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 7) University of Rzeszów, Poland, 9–13 February, 2011.Google Scholar
  40. Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students' problem posing in school mathematics. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Melbourne: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.Google Scholar
  41. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms and technical manual. Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Services.Google Scholar
  42. Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1997). Teaching realistic mathematical modeling in the elementary school. A teaching experiment with fifth graders. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Voica, C., & Singer, M. (2012). Creative contexts as ways to strengthen mathematics learning. In M. Aniţei, M. Chraif & C. Vasile (guest Eds.), Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, PSIWORLD 2011 (vol. 33, 538–542). Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812001875. Accessed 3 Oct 2013.
  44. Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2010). An exploratory study of relationships between students' creativity and mathematical problem posing abilities. In B. Sriraman & K. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 5–28). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florence Mihaela Singer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nerida Ellerton
    • 2
  • Jinfa Cai
    • 3
  1. 1.University of PloiestiPloiestiRomania
  2. 2.Illinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  3. 3.University of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations