Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 83, Issue 1, pp 117–132 | Cite as

An investigation of relationships between students’ mathematical problem-posing abilities and their mathematical content knowledge

  • Xianwei Y. Van Harpen
  • Norma C. Presmeg
Article

Abstract

The importance of students’ problem-posing abilities in mathematics has been emphasized in the K-12 curricula in the USA and China. There are claims that problem-posing activities are helpful in developing creative approaches to mathematics. At the same time, there are also claims that students’ mathematical content knowledge could be highly related to creativity in mathematics, too. This paper reports on a study that investigated USA and Chinese high school students’ mathematical content knowledge, their abilities in mathematical problem posing, and the relationships between students’ mathematical content knowledge and their problem-posing abilities in mathematics.

Keywords

Mathematical problem posing Mathematical content knowledge Comparative study Correlation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to thank her dissertation committee members for their patience and expert guidance. They are Dr. Norma Presmeg, Dr. Nerida Ellerton, Dr. McKenzie Clements, Dr. John Rugutt, and Dr. Bharath Sriraman.

References

  1. Akay, H., & Boz, N. (2009). Prospective teachers’ views about problem-posing activities. Procedia Social and Behavior Sciences, 1(1), 1192–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cai, J. (2000). Mathematical thinking involved in US and Chinese students’ solving process-constrained and process-open problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2002). Generalized and generative thinking in US and Chinese students’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellerton, N. F. (1986). Children’s made-up mathematics problems: a new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. English, L. D. (1997). Promoting a problem-posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4, 172–181.Google Scholar
  7. Gu, L. (2000). Exploring the middle zone. Paper presented at the 9th International Congress of Mathematics Education (Gathering of Chinese scholars), Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  8. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Traits of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 142–161). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  9. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mathematics Curriculum Development Group of Basic Education of Education Department [教育部基础教育司数学课程标准研制组]. (2002). The interpretation of mathematics curriculum (Trial Version).[数学课程标准(实验稿)解读]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.Google Scholar
  11. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2009). The National Assessment of Educational Progress overview. Retrieved August 28, 2009, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/mathematics/
  12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  13. Peverly, S. (2005). Moving past cultural homogeneity: Suggestions for comparisons of students’ educational outcomes in the United States and China. Psychology in the Schools, 42(3), 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Presmeg, N. C. (1981). Parallel threads in the development of Albert Einstein’s thought and current ideas on creativity: What are the implications for the teaching of school mathematics? Unpublished M.Ed. dissertation in Educational Psychology, University of Natal.Google Scholar
  15. Priest, D. J. (2009). A problem-posing intervention in the development of problem-solving competence of underachieving middle-year students (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  16. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: current cognitive research (pp. 83–103). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  17. Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 97(3), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stoyanova, E. (1997). Extending and exploring students’ problem solving via problem posing: A study of years 8 and 9 students involved in mathematics challenge and enrichment stages of Euler enrichment program for young Australians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (pp. 518–525). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. The University of Melbourne: AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  20. Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wong, N. Y. (2004). The CHC learner’s phenomenon: its implications on mathematics education. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: perspectives from insiders (pp. 503–534). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yuan, X., & Presmeg, N. (2010). An exploratory study of high school students’ creativity and mathematical problem posing in China and the United States. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 4, 321–328.Google Scholar
  23. Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2011). An exploratory study of relationships between students’ creativity and mathematical problem posing abilities—comparing Chinese and U.S students. In B. Sriraman & K. Lee (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 5–28). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang, D. (2004). The “two basics”: Mathematics teaching and learning in Mainland China. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: perspectives from insiders (pp. 189–207). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang, D. (2005). The “two basics”: mathematics teaching in Mainland China. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Illinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations