Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 379–396 | Cite as

Teachers’ ability to identify and explain students’ actions in near and far figural pattern generalization tasks

  • Rabih Raif El Mouhayar
  • Murad Eid JurdakEmail author
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore middle school in-service mathematics teachers’ ability (1) to identify and explain students’ actions in pattern generalization and (2) to account for the variation in teachers’ explanations of students’ actions in terms of task and teachers’ factors. Two questionnaires were developed: (1) a questionnaire to measure teachers’ ability to identify students’ actions while finding the nth term in the pattern generalization and (2) a questionnaire to measure teachers’ ability to explain students’ actions in different tasks. The two questionnaires were given to a sample of 83 middle school in-service mathematics teachers from 22 schools in Lebanon. Analysis of data shows that teachers seemed to have the ability to identify students’ actions while finding the nth term in the pattern generalization and that teachers’ explanations of students’ actions in different tasks are lacking in terms of identifying variable-related counting elements. The results of stepwise multiple regression show that teachers’ ability to explain students’ actions to find the general term depends on their ability to explain students’ step-by-step counting or drawing.

Keywords

Pattern generalization Near generalization tasks Far generalization tasks Teacher knowledge Abductive–inductive actions Symbolic actions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the University Research Board at the American University of Beirut.

References

  1. Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2008). “Rising the challenge”: Using generalization in pattern problems to unearth the algebraic skills of talented pre-algebra students. ZDM, 40, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BouJaoude, S., & El-Mouhayar, R. (2010). Teacher education in Lebanon: Trends and issues. In K. Karras & C. C. Wolhuter (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education world-wide (Vol. 2, pp. 309–332). Athens: Atrapos Editions.Google Scholar
  3. Chua, B. L., & Hoyles, C. (2009). Generalisation and perceptual agility: How did teachers fare in a quadratic generalising problem? Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 29(2), 13–18.Google Scholar
  4. De Bock, D., van Dooren, W., Jannsens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Improper use of linear reasoning: An in-depth study of the nature and the irresistibility of secondary school students’ errors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dörfler. (2008). En route from patterns to algebra: Comments and reflections. ZDM, 40, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. English, L., & Warren, E. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. Mathematics Teacher, 91(2), 166–170.Google Scholar
  7. Harel, G., & Tall, D. (1991). The general, the abstract and the generic in advanced mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 38–42.Google Scholar
  8. Kaput, J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133–155). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Krebs, A. (2005). Studying students’ reasoning in writing generalizations. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 10(6), 284–287.Google Scholar
  10. Lannin, J. (2003). Developing algebraic reasoning through generalization. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8(7), 342–348.Google Scholar
  11. Lannin, J., Barker, D., & Townsend, B. (2006). Algebraic generalisation strategies: Factors influencing student strategy selection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.Google Scholar
  14. Polya, G. (1954). Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and construction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM, 40, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rivera, F. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2007). Abduction–induction (generalization) processes of elementary majors on figural patterns in algebra. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2008). Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns. ZDM, 40(1), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2009). Algebraic reasoning through patterns. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(4), 212–221.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, M., Silver, E., & Stein, M. (2005). Improving instruction in algebra: Using cases to transform mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steele, D. (2008). Seventh-grade students’ representations for pictorial growth and change problems. ZDM, 40, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Steele, D., & Johanning, D. (2004). A schematic–theoretic view of problem solving and development of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swafford, J. O., & Langrall, C. W. (2000). Grade 6 students’ preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 89–112.Google Scholar
  26. Van de Walle, J. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  27. Yeap, B.-H., & Kaur, B. (2008). Elementary school students engaging in making generalisation: A glimpse from a Singapore classroom. ZDM, 40, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American University of BeirutBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations