Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 77, Issue 2–3, pp 351–367 | Cite as

Geometry, subjectivity and the seduction of language: the regulation of spatial perception

  • Tony BrownEmail author
  • David Heywood
Article

Abstract

Following Husserl's speculations on how geometry originated, we suggest that spatial perception is seduced by language as a result of human attempts to capture, signify and share its concepts. And this language traps geometry and humans themselves in to the forms that have guided and regulated past practices, thereby obscuring possibilities for cultural growth and adjustments to new conditions. Some body movement exercises reveal student teachers' spatial orientations. The paper proposes that the very evolution of geometry, and the ontological status of its objects, relate to their representation in cultural forms referenced to human self-image. It is further argued that learning crucially relates to evolving mathematical or pedagogical understandings of spatial phenomena.

Keywords

Geometry Subjectivity Language History Unity Embodiment Husserl 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The classes of 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 performed the shapes: Special thanks to Sally Jackson (for the drawings), Clare Crookall, Claire Shakeshaft, Jenny Taylor and to our colleague Yvette Solomon.

References

  1. Badiou, A. (2007). Being and event. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Badiou, A. (2009). Logics of worlds. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  3. Barcelo, C., Liberati, S., Sonego, S., & Visser, M. (2009). Black stars, not holes. Scientific American (Oct, pp. 20–27).Google Scholar
  4. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  5. Bradford, K., & Brown, T. (2005). Ceci n'est pas un circle. [This is not a circle.]. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), 16–19.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, T. (2008a). Lacan, subjectivity and the task of mathematics education research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, T. (2008b). Signifying “learner”, “teacher” and “mathematics”: A response to a special issue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, T. (Ed.). (2008c). The psychology of mathematics education: A psychoanalytic displacement. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, T. (2008d). Desire and drive in researcher subjectivity: The broken mirror of Lacan. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(3), 402–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, T. (2010). Truth and the renewal of knowledge: The case of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, T. (forthcoming). Mathematics education and subjectivity. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, T., & McNamara, O. (in press). Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, J. (1989). Edmund Husserl's origin of geometry: An introduction. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, J. (2005). Rogues: Two essays on reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Edermariam, A. (2009). Master of the universe. Guardian (24th Oct, pp. 34–35).Google Scholar
  16. Gabriel, M., & Žižek, S. (2009). Mythology, madness and laughter: Subjectivity in German idealism. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Gattegno, C. (1988). The science of education. Part 2B: The awareness of mathematization. New York: Educational Solutions.Google Scholar
  18. Hallward, P. (2003). Badiou: A subject to truth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Heywood, D., & Parker, J. (2010). The pedagogy of physical science. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Husserl, E. (1936). The origin of geometry. (Translated by D. Carr, from Biemel edition of Husserl's ‘The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology’). In J. Derrida (1989). Edmund Husserl's Origin of geometry: An introduction. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press (pp. 155–180).Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T. S. (1985). The Copernican revolution: Planetary astronomy and the development of western thought. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Nemirovsky, R., & Ferrara, F. (2008). Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (1998). The earth and beyond: Developing primary teachers understanding of basic astronomical events. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic cultural approach to students' types of generalisation. Mathematics Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 71–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radford, L. (2004). Sensible things, essences, mathematical objects, and other ambiguities. La Matematica e la Sua Didatica, 1, 4–23.Google Scholar
  27. Radford, L. (2008). Culture and cognition: Towards an anthropology of mathematical thinking. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 439–464). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative: Volume 1. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ricoeur, P. (2006). Memory, history and forgetting. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Roth, W. M., & Thom, J. (2008). Bodily experience and mathematical conceptions: From classical views to a phenomenological reconceptualisation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schubring, G. (2008). Processes of algebraization in the history of mathematics: The impact of signs. In L. Radford, G. Schubring, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics and mathematics education. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  32. Spyrou, P., Moutsios-Rentzos, A., & Triantafyllou, D. (2009). Teaching for the objectification of the Pythagorean theorem. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project (pp. 530–534). Dresden: MEC21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations