Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 379–399

The challenge of self-regulated learning in mathematics teachers' professional training



This study investigated mathematics teachers' professional knowledge among elementary school teachers exposed to a professional training program that either supported self-regulated learning (SRL) or offered no SRL support (no-SRL). The SRL support was based on the IMPROVE metacognitive self-questioning method that directs students' attention to understanding when, why, and how to solve problems (Kramarski and Mevarech, Am Educ Res J 40:281–310, 2003). Sixty-four Israeli elementary teachers participated in a month-long professional development program to enhance mathematical and pedagogical knowledge. The course was part of a 3-year professional development program sponsored by the Israeli Ministry of Education. This mixed-method study included quantitative assessments of teachers' professional knowledge in mathematical problem solving for an authentic task based on Program for International Student Assessment's framework (Program for International Student Assessment, 2003) and in lesson planning, as well as qualitative interviews and videotaped observations of two teachers. Results indicated that teachers in the SRL program outperformed those in the no-SRL program on various problem solving skills (e.g., reflection and conceptual mathematical explanations) and lesson planning (e.g., task demands and teaching approach). Videotaped observations of actual teaching indicated that the SRL-trained teacher demonstrated more teaching practices that aimed to promote students' understanding and better supported students' regulation of their own learning, compared to the no-SRL-trained teacher. We discuss educational and practical implications.


Mathematics teachers Professional knowledge Authentic tasks Lesson planning SRL support Class observations 


  1. Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teachers and teaching: testing policy hypotheses from a national commission report. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 5–15.Google Scholar
  2. Farmer, J., Gerretson, H., & Lassak, M. (2003). What teachers take from professional development: Cases and implications. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(4), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Grossman, P. L. (1995). Teachers' knowledge. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 20–24). Tarrytown: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  4. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kramarski, B. (2004). Making sense of graphs: Does metacognitive instruction make a difference on students’ mathematical conceptions and alternative conceptions? Learning and Instruction, 14, 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kramarski, B. (2008). Promoting teachers' algebraic reasoning and self-regulation with metacognitive guidance. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effect of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 281–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. R., & Arami, M. (2002). The effects of metacognitive training on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. R., & Liberman, A. (2001). The effects of multilevel- versus unilevel-metacognitive training on mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, M. (2009). Investigating preservice teachers' professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kramarski, B., & Zoldan, S. (2008). Using errors as springboards for enhancing mathematical reasoning with three metacognitive approaches. Journal of Educational Research, 102(2), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1997). Improve: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 365–394.Google Scholar
  13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Perry, N. E., Phillips, L., & Hutchinson, L. (2006). Mentoring student teachers to support self-regulated learning. Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Program for International Student Assessment—PISA. (2003). Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow: Further results from PISA 2000. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  17. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15.Google Scholar
  18. Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2000). Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 651–685). Orlando: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 165–197). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  20. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  21. Shulman, L. S., & Sparks, D. (1992). Merging content knowledge and pedagogy: An interview with Lee Shulman. Journal of Staff Development, 13(1), 14–16.Google Scholar
  22. Teo, S. K. L. T., Chua, K. G., Cheang, K., & Joseph, K. Y. (2007). The development of diploma in education student teachers’ mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics, 5(2), 237–261.Google Scholar
  23. Veenman, M. V. J., Bernadette, H. A. M., Hout-Wolters, V., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zohar, A., & Schwartzer, N. (2005). Assessing teachers' pedagogical knowledge in the context of teaching higher order thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1595–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations