Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 235–261 | Cite as

A categorization of the “whys” and “hows” of using history in mathematics education

Article

Abstract

This is a theoretical article proposing a way of organizing and structuring the discussion of why and how to use the history of mathematics in the teaching and learning of mathematics, as well as the interrelations between the arguments for using history and the approaches to doing so. The way of going about this is to propose two sets of categories in which to place the arguments for using history (the “whys”) and the different approaches to doing this (the “hows”). The arguments for using history are divided into two categories; history as a tool and history as a goal. The ways of using history are placed into three categories of approaches: the illumination, the modules, and the history-based approaches. This categorization, along with a discussion of the motivation for using history being one concerned with either the inner issues (in-issues) or the metaperspective issues (meta-issues) of mathematics, provides a means of ordering the discussion of “whys” and “hows.”

Keywords

Using history in mathematics education Whys and hows History as a tool, history as a goal Indispensability of arguments In-issues and meta-issues Illumination, modules, and history-based approaches Genetic principle 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would especially like to thank Mogens Niss, who provided me with the basic idea for this article. Also thanks to Tinne Hoff Kjeldsen, Man-Keung Siu, Jan van Maanen, and Abraham Arcavi for fruitful discussions. Thanks as well to the editor and the anonymous ESM reviewers for constructive revision. Thanks to Merete Carlsen and Jørgen Larsen for linguistic and technical assistance respectively, and thanks to Imajean Gray for proofreading.

References

  1. Arcavi, A., & Isoda, M. (2007). Learning to listen: From historical sources to classroom practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 111–129. Special issue on the history of mathematics in mathematics education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachelard, G. (1938). La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education—on symbolizing and computer tools. Ph.D. thesis, The Freudenthal Inistitute, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2006). An historical phenomenology of mean and median. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barabash, M., & Guberman-Glebov, R. (2004). Seminar and graduate project in the history of mathematics as a source of cultural and intercultural enrichment of the academic teacher education program. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1–2), 73–88. Special double issue on the role of the history of mathematics in mathematics education (proceedings from TSG 17 at ICME 10).Google Scholar
  6. Barbin, E. (2007). On the argument of simplicity in ‘elements’ and schoolbooks of geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 225–242. Special issue on the history of mathematics in mathematics education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Bazzini, L. (2003). Research, practice and theory in didactics of mathematics: Towards dialogue between different fields. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out—classifications and its consequences. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  9. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  10. Burn, B. (1998). Matematikkens historie—blindspor eller skattekiste? Tangenten, 2, 10–14. English translation of title: The history of mathematics - blind alley or treasure chest?Google Scholar
  11. Burn, R. P. (1999). Integration, a genetic approach. Nomad, 7(1), 7–27.Google Scholar
  12. Burn, B. (2005). The vice: Some historically inspired and proof-generated steps to limits of sequences. Educational Studies of Mathematics, 60, 269–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calinger, R. (Ed.) (1996). Vita mathematica—historical research and integration with teaching. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  14. Charette, R. J. (2004). Integrating the history of mathematics in the teaching of mathematics: The missing link between Pythagoras and King Tut. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1–2), 115–124. Special double issue on the role of the history of mathematics in mathematics education (proceedings from TSG 17 at ICME 10).Google Scholar
  15. Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. London: Pinguin Books.Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, H. M. (1977). Fermat’s last theorem—a genetic introduction to algebraic number theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Farmaki, V., & Paschos, T. (2007). Employing genetic ‘moments’ in the history of mathematics in classroom activites. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fauvel, J. (1991). Using history in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(2), 3–6. Special Issue on History in Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
  19. Fauvel, J., & van Maanen, J. (Eds.) (2000). History in mathematics education—the ICMI study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  20. Fraser, B. J., & Koop, A. J. (1978). Teachers’ opinions about some teaching material involving history of mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 9(2), 147–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  22. Freudenthal, H. (1981). Should a mathematics teacher know something about the history of mathematics? For the Learning of Mathematics, 2(1), 30–33.Google Scholar
  23. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education—China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  24. Fried, M. N. (2001). Can mathematics education and history of mahtematics coexist? Science & Education, 10, 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fried, M. N. (2007). Didactics and history of mathematics: Knowledge and self-knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 203–223. Special issue on the history of mathematics in mathematics education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fung, C.-I. (2004). How history fuels teaching for mathematising: Some personal reflections. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1–2), 125–146. Special double issue on the role of the history of mathematics in mathematics education (proceedings from TSG 17 at ICME 10).Google Scholar
  27. Furinghetti, F. (1997). History of mathematics, mathematics education, school practice: Case studies linking different domains. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
  28. Furinghetti, F. (2004). History and mathematics education: A look around the world with particular reference to Italy. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1–2), 1–20. Special double issue on the role of the history of mathematics in mathematics education (proceedings from TSG 17 at ICME 10).Google Scholar
  29. Furinghetti, F. (2007). Teacher education through the history of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 131–143. Special issue on the history of mathematics in mathematics education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Furinghetti, F., & Radford, L. (2002). Historical conceptual developments and the teaching of mathematics: From phylogenesis and ontogenesis theory to classroom practice. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 631–654, Chapter 25). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Gagatsis, A., & Thomaidis, J. (1995). Eine Studie zur historichen Entwicklung und didaktischen Transposition des Begriffs ‘absoluter Betrag’. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 16(1/2), 3–46.Google Scholar
  32. Glaeser, G. (1981). Epistémologie des nombres relatifs. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 2(3), 303–346.Google Scholar
  33. Goodwin, D. M. (2007). Exploring the relationship between high school teachers’ mathematics history knowledge and their images of mathematics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Lowell.Google Scholar
  34. Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gulikers, I., & Blom, K. (2001). ‘A historical angle’, a survey of recent literature on the use and value of the history in geometrical education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 223–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haeckel, E. (1906). The evolution of man—a popular scientific study. London: Watts.Google Scholar
  37. Harper, E. (1987). Ghost of Diophanthus. Educational Studies of Mathematics, 18, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heiede, T. (1992). Why teach history of mathematics? The Mathematical Gazette, 76(475), 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heiede, T. (1996). History of mathematics and the teacher. In R. Calinger (Ed.), Vita mathematica—historical research and integration with teaching, MAA notes (Vol. 40, pp. 231–244). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  40. Helfgott, M. (2004). Two examples from the natural sciences and their relationship to the history and pedagogy of mathematics. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1–2), 147–164. Special double issue on the role of the history of mathematics in mathematics education (proceedings from TSG 17 at ICME 10).Google Scholar
  41. Horng, W.-S. (2007). Teachers’ professional development in terms of the HPM: A story of Yu. In F. Furinghetti, S. Kaijser, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings HPM2004 & ESU4 (revised edition, pp. 346–358). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet. Note that due to an error in the printing of the proceedings the correct version of this paper does not appears here. I obtained a correct copy from the editors.Google Scholar
  42. Høyrup, J. (2007). The roles of Mesopotamian bronze age mathematics tool for state formation and administration—carrier of teachers’ professional intellectual autonomy. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 257–271. Special issue on the history of mathematics in mathematics education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jahnke, H. N. (2000). The use of original sources in the mathematics classroom. In J. Fauvel, & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education, the ICMI study (pp. 291–328, Chapter 9). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  44. Jahnke, H. N. (2001). Cantor’s cardinal and ordinal infinies: An epistemological and didactic view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jahnke, H. N., Knoche, N., & Otte, M. (Eds.) (1996). History of mathematica and education: Ideas and experiences, Studien zur Wissenschafts-, Sozial- und Bildungsgeschichte der Mathematik (Vol. 11). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  46. Jankvist, U. T. (2007a). Den matematikhistoriske dimension i undervisning—generelt set. MONA, 3(3), 70–90. English translation of title: The dimension of the history of mathematics in teaching and learning—generally seen.Google Scholar
  47. Jankvist, U. T. (2007b). Empirical research in the field of using history in mathematics education: Review of empirical studies in HPM2004 & ESU4. Nomad, 12(3), 83–105.Google Scholar
  48. Jankvist, U. T. (2008). Den matematikhistoriske dimension i undervisning—gymnasialt set. MONA, 4(1), 24–45. English translation of title: The dimension of the history of mathematics in teaching—the case of upper secondary level.Google Scholar
  49. Katz, V. (Ed.) (2000). Using history to teach mathematics—an international perspective, MAA notes (Vol. 51). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  50. Katz, V., & Barton, B. (2007). Stages in the history of algebra with implications for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 185–201. Special issue on the history of mathematics in mathematics education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Katz, V. J., & Michalowicz, K. D. (Eds.) (2004). Historical modules for the teaching and learning of mathematics. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  52. Klein, F. (1908). Elementarmathematik vom höheren Standpunkte aus. Stuttgart: Leipzig.Google Scholar
  53. Kleiner, I. (2001). History of the infinitely small and the infinitely large in calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lindstrøm, T. (1995). Kalkulus. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  55. Lit, C.-K., Siu, M.-K., & Wong, N.-Y. (2001). The use of history in the teaching of mathematics: Theory, practice, and evaluation of effectiveness. Educational Journal, 29(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
  56. McBride, C. C., & Rollins, J. H. (1977). The effects of history of mathematics on attitudes toward mathematics of college algebra students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(1), 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mosvold, R. (2001). Det genetiske prinsipp i matematikkdidaktikk. Master’s thesis, Høgskolen i Agder, Kristiansand. English translation of title: The genetic principle in didactics of mathematics.Google Scholar
  58. Niss, M. (2001a). Indledning. In M. Niss (Ed.), Matematikken og verden, Fremads debatbøger—Videnskab til debat. Copenhagen: Forfatterne og Forlaget A/S. English translation of title: Introduction to the book: Mathematics and the World.Google Scholar
  59. Niss, M. (2001b). University mathematics based on problem-oriented student projects: 25 years of experience with the Roskilde model. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level, an ICMI study (pp. 153–165). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  60. Niss, M., & Jensen, T. H. (Eds.) (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklæring—ideer og inspiration til udvikling af matematikundervisning i Danmark. Undervisningsministeriet. Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahæfteserie nr. 18. English translation of title: Competencies and Learning of Mathematics—Ideas and Inspiration for the Development of Mathematics Education in Denmark.Google Scholar
  61. Philippou, G. N., & Christou, C. (1998). The effects of a preparatory mathemtics program in changing prospective teachers’ attitudes towards mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Poincaré, H. (1899). La Logique et L’Intuition dans la Science Mathématique et dans L’Enseignement. L’Enseignement Mathématique, 1, 157–162.Google Scholar
  63. Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery (combined edition). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  64. Radford, L. (1997). On psychology, historical epistemology, and the teaching of mathematics: Towards a socio-cultural history of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(1), 26–33.Google Scholar
  65. Radford, L. (2000a). Historical formation and student understanding of mathematics. In J. Fauvel, & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education. The ICMI study (pp. 143–170, Chapter 5). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  66. Radford, L. (2000b). Signs and measuring in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Radford, L., & Puig, L. (2007). Syntax and meaning as sensuous, visual, historical forms of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 145–164. Special issue on the history of mathematics in mathematics education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Russ, S., Ransom, P., Perkins, P., Barbin, E., Arcavi, A., Brown, G., et al. (1991). The experience of history in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(2), 7–16. Special Issue on History in Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
  69. Schubring, G. (1978). Das genetische Prinzip in der Mathematik-Didaktik. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  70. Schubring, G. (1988). Historische Begriffsentwicklung und Lernprozeß aus der Sicht neuerer mathematikdidaktischer Konzeptionen (Fehler, ‘Obstacles”, Transpositionen). Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 20(4), 138–148.Google Scholar
  71. Schubring, G. (2005). Conflicts between generalization, rigor, and intuition: Number concepts underlying the development of analysis in 17–19th century France and Germany. Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  72. Schubring, G. (2007). Ontogeny and phylogeny—categories for cognitive development. In F. Furinghetti, S. Kaijser, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings HPM2004 & ESU4 (revised edition, pp. 329–339). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
  73. Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 14, 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  75. Sierpinska, A. (1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 2. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  77. Siu, F.-K., & Siu, M.-K. (1979). History of mathematics and its relation to mathematical education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 10(4), 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Siu, M.-K. (2000). The ABCD of using history of mathematics in the (undergraduate) classroom. In V. Katz (Ed.), Using history to teach mathematics—an international perspective, MAA notes (Vol. 51, pp. 3–9). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  79. Siu, M.-K. (2007). No, I don’t use history of mathematics in my class. Why? In F. Furinghetti, S. Kaijser, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings HPM2004 & ESU4 (revised edition, pp. 268–277). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
  80. Stillwell, J. (1989). Mathematics and its history. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  81. Streefland, L. (2003). Learning from history for teaching in the future. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Su, Y.-W. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ professional development: Integrating history of mathematics into teaching. In F. Furinghetti, S. Kaijser, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings HPM2004 & ESU4 (revised edition, pp. 368–382). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
  83. Swetz, F. (1995). Using problems from the history of mathematics in classroom instruction. In F. Swetz, J. Fauvel, O. Bekken, B. Johansson, & V. Katz (Eds.), Learn from the masters (pp. 25–38). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  84. Swetz, F. (2000). Problem solving from the history of mathematics. In V. Katz (Ed.), Using history to teach mathematics—an international perspective, MAA notes (Vol. 51, pp. 59–65). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  85. Swetz, F., Fauvel, J., Bekken, O., Johansson, B., & Katz, V., (Eds.) (1995) Learn from the masters. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  86. Taimina, D. (2004). History of mathematics and mechanics in digital Reuleaux kinematic mechanism collection. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1–2), 89–102. Special double issue on the role of the history of mathematics in mathematics education (proceedings from TSG 17 at ICME 10).Google Scholar
  87. Tang, K.-C. (2007). History of mathematics for the young educated minds: A Hong Kong reflection. In F. Furinghetti, S. Kaijser, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings HPM2004 & ESU4 (revised edition, pp. 630–638). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
  88. Tattersall, J., & McMurran, S. L. (2004). Using the ‘educational times’ in the classroom. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1–2), 103–114. Special double issue on the role of the history of mathematics in mathematics education (proceedings from TSG 17 at ICME 10).Google Scholar
  89. Thomaidis, Y., & Tzanakis, C. (2007). The notion of historical ‘parallelism’ revisited: Historical evolution and students’ conception of the order relation on the number line. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 165–183. Special issue on the history of mathematics in mathematics education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Toeplitz, O. (1927). Das Problem der Universitätsvorlesungen über Infinitesimalrechnung und ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Infinitesimalrechnung an den höheren Schulen. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, XXXVI, 88–100.Google Scholar
  91. Toeplitz, O. (1949). Die Entwicklung der Infinititesimalrechnung. Berlin: Springer. Republished in 1972.Google Scholar
  92. Toeplitz, O. (1963). The calculus: A genetic approach. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  93. Tzanakis, C. (2000). Presenting the relation between mathematics and physics on the basis of their history: A genetic approach. In V. Katz (Ed.), Using history to teach mathematics—an international perspective, MAA notes (Vol. 51, pp. 111–120). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  94. Tzanakis, C., & Arcavi, A. (2000). Integrating history of mathematics in the classroom: An analytic survey. In J. Fauvel, & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education (pp. 201–240, Chapter 7). The ICMI Study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  95. Tzanakis, C., & Kourkoulos, M. (2007). May history and physics provide a useful aid for introducing basic statistical concepts? In F. Furinghetti, S. Kaijser, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings HPM2004 & ESU4 (revised edition, pp. 284–295). Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
  96. Tzanakis, C., & Thomaidis, Y. (2000). Integrating the close historical development of mathematics and physics in mathematics education: Some methodological and epistemological remarks. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(1), 44–55.Google Scholar
  97. Van Amerom, B. A. (2002). Reinvention of early algebra—developmental research on the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Ph.D. thesis, The Freudenthal Inistitute, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  98. Van Amerom, B. A. (2003). Focusing on informal stragies when linking arithmetic to early algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Van Maanen, J. (1997). New maths may profit from old methods. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(2), 39–46.Google Scholar
  100. Vasco, C. E. (1995). History of mathematics as a tool for teaching mathematics for understanding. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, & M. S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school—teaching for understanding with new technologies (pp. 56–69). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Waldegg, G. (2004). Problem solving, collaborative learning and history of mathematics: Experiences in training in-service teachers. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1–2), 63–72. Special double issue on the role of the history of mathematics in mathematics education (proceedings from TSG 17 at ICME 10).Google Scholar
  102. Weil, A. (1978). History of mathematics: Why and how. In O. Lehto (Ed.), Procedings of the international congress of mathematicians, Helsinki, 15–23 August 1978 (pp. 227–236). Hungary: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
  103. Zormbala, K., & Tzanakis, C. (2004). The concept of the plane in geometry: Elements of the historical evolution inherent in modern views. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 3(1–2), 37–62. Special double issue on the role of the history of mathematics in mathematics education (proceedings from TSG 17 at ICME 10).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science, Systems, and Models, IMFUFARoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations