Advertisement

Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 345–371 | Cite as

Metaphors and Models in Translation Between College and Workplace Mathematics

  • julian williams
  • geoff wake
Article

Abstract

We report a study of repairs in communication between workers and visiting outsiders (students, researchers or teachers). We show how cultural models such as metaphors and mathematical models facilitated explanations and repair work in inquiry and pedagogical dialogues. We extend previous theorisations of metaphor by Black; Lakoff and Johnson; Lakoff & Nunes; and Schon, to formulate a perspective on mathematical models and modelling and show how dialogues can manifest (i) application of ‘dead’ models to new contexts, and (ii) generative modelling. In particular, we draw in some depth on one case study of the use of a double number line model of the ‘gas day’ and its mediation of communication within two dialogues, characterised by inquiry and pedagogical discourse genres respectively. In addition to spatial and gestural affordances due to its blend of grounding metaphors, the model translates between workplace objects on the one side and spreadsheet-mathematical symbols on the other. The model is found to afford generative constructions that mediate the emergence of new understandings in the dialogues. Finally we discuss the significance of this metaphorical perspective on modelling for mathematics education.

Keywords

case studies discourse mathematical genres metaphors models modelling translation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakhtin, M., Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.: 1986, Speech genres and other late essays (Transl. C. Emerson and M. Holquist), University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  2. Black, M.: 1962, Models and metaphors: studies in language and philosophy, Cornell UP, Ithaka, NY.Google Scholar
  3. Black, M. (ed.): 1993, More about metaphor, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, W. and Niss, M.: 1991, ’Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling applications and links to other subjects – state, trends and issues in mathematics instruction’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cobb, P., Yackel, E. and McClain, K. (eds.): 2000, Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J.Google Scholar
  6. English, L.D.: 1997, Mathematical reasoning: analogies, metaphors and images, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.Google Scholar
  7. Freudenthal, H.: 1983, Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures, D. Reidel, Dordrect.Google Scholar
  8. Gee, J.P.: 1996, Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourses, Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
  9. Gee, J.P. and Green, J.L.: 1998, ’Discourse Analysis, Learning, and Social Practice: A methodological study’, Review of Research in Education 23, 119–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldin, G.: 2001, ’Countinng on the metaphorical. Where mathematics comes from: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being’, Nature, 413(6851), 18–19, 413(6851), 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gravemeijer, K., McClain, K. and Stephan, M.: 1999, ’Supporting students’ construction of increasingly sophisticated ways of reasoning through problem solving’, in A. Olivier and K. Newstead (eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-second annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, Stellenbosch, South Africa, pp. 194–209.Google Scholar
  12. Halliday, M.A.K.: 1978, Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  13. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R.: 1985, Language, concept and text: aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, Deakin University Press, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Holland, D. and Quinn, N. (Eds.): 1987, Cultural Models in Language and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Hutchins, E.: 1995, Cognition in the wild, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  16. Lakoff, G.: 1987, Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.: 1980, Metaphors we live by, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Lakoff, K. and Johnson, M.: 1999, Philosophy in the Flesh, Basic Books, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Lakoff, G. and Nunez, R.E.: 2000, Where mathematics comes from: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being, Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  20. Lamon, S.J., Parker, W.A. and Houston, S.K. (eds.): 2003, Mathematical Modelling: A Way of Life ( ICTMA 11), Horwood, Chichester.Google Scholar
  21. McNeill, D.: 1992, Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. Niss, M.: 1996, ’Goals of Mathematics Teaching’, in A.J. Bishop (ed.), International handbook of mathematics education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, London, pp. 11–47.Google Scholar
  23. Nunez, R.E.: 2000, ’Mathematical idea analysis: What embodied cognitive science can say about the human nature of mathematics’, Proceedings of 24th Conference of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME), Hiroshima University, Nishiki Print Co. Hiroshima, Japan 1, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  24. Pimm, D.: 1987, Speaking mathematically, Routledge & Kegan, NY.Google Scholar
  25. Pozzi, S., Noss, R. and Hoyles, C.: 1998, ’Tools in Practice, Mathematics in Use’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 36, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reddy, M. (ed.): 1993, The conduit metaphor, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Roth, W-M.: 2001, ’Gestures: their role in teaching and learning’, Review of Educational Research 71(3), 365–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schiralli, M. and Sinclair, N.: 2003, A constructive response to ’Where Mathematics Comes From’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 52, 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schon, D.A.: 1995, ’Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy’, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought: 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 137–163.Google Scholar
  30. Sfard, A.: 1994, ’Reification as the birth of metaphor’, For the Learnng of Mathematics 14(1), 44–55.Google Scholar
  31. Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M.: 1975, Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The english used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  32. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Coulson, R.L. and Anderson, D.K.: 1989, ’Multiple analogies for complex concepts: antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition’, in S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 498–531.Google Scholar
  33. Streefland, L.: 1991, Fractions in realistic mathematics education: a paradigm of developmental research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  34. Treffers, A.: 1987, Three dimensions: a model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction–the Wiskobas Project, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  35. van Oers, B.: 1998, ’From context to contextualising’, Learning and Instruction 8(6), 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wake, G.D. and Williams, J.S.: 2001, Using College Mathematics in Understanding Workplace practice: Summative Report of the Research Project Funded by the Leverhulme Trust, Manchester, University of Manchester, http://www.education.man.ac.uk\lta\publications\leverhulme\_summary.htm Google Scholar
  37. Wartofsky, M.W.: 1979, Models: representation and the scientific understanding, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  38. Wells, C.G.: 1999, Dialogic inquiry: towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Werner, H. and Kaplan, B.: 1963, Symbol formation: an organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Wertsch, J.V.: 1991, Voices of the mind: a sociocultural approach to mediated action, Harvester, London.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, J.S. and Wake, G.D.: this issue, ’Black boxes in workplace mathematics’, Educational Studies in Mathematics.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, J.S., Wake, G.D. and Boreham, N.C.: 2001, ’College mathematics and workplace practice: an activity theory perspective’, Research in Mathematics Education 3, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations