Educational Studies in Mathematics

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 235–252 | Cite as

Teaching Undergraduate Mathematics on the Internet

PART 1: Technologies and Taxonomy
  • Johann Engelbrecht
  • Ansie Harding


The world wide web is becoming wider at an increasing rate. It is virtually impossible to take any kind of accurate snapshot of the state of its development. Undergraduate mathematics courses presented on the internet are relative newcomers to the race but nevertheless seem to be increasing in numbers also at a phenomenal rate. Internet education in mathematics is developing as a new mode of teaching with its own characteristics and possibilities, different from any traditional way of teaching. Research on this new mode of teaching is sparse and open research questions are temptingly plentiful. In a study presented in two parts, we try to capture the world of internet teaching of undergraduate mathematics with its myriad of possibilities. In this, the first part, we briefly list some of the technologies involved and we attempt to create some order in the huge number of activities that are available on the web. We give an overview of the scope of mathematics courses presented via the internet and attempt a graphical classification of the different types of web courses. In the second part (Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A.: 2004a, Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the web 2: Attributes and possibilities) we discuss characteristics and implications of this mode of teaching/learning mathematics, list possible research issues and envisage possible future trends.

Key Words

mathematics teaching undergraduate mathematics Web-based mathematics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barron, A 1998, ‘Designing web-based training’, British Journal of Educational Technology 29(4), 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bookbinder, J 2000, Enhancing the Mathematics Curriculum with Web-Based Technology, ICME, Hangzhou, China, May 2000.Google Scholar
  3. Crowe, D. and Z and, H 2000, ‘Computers and undergraduate mathematics. 3: Internet resources’, Computers and Education 35, 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Czerniewicz, L 2001, ‘Reflections on learning online – the hype and the reality’, South African Journal of Higher Education 15(3), 17–23.Google Scholar
  5. Drucker, F.P 1997, The Organisation of the Future, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  6. Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A 2001a, ‘WWW mathematics at the University of Pretoria: The trial run’, South African Journal of Science 97(9/10), 368–370.Google Scholar
  7. Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A 2001b, ‘Internet calculus: An option?’ Quaestiones Mathematicae, Supplement 1, 183–191.Google Scholar
  8. Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A 2002, ‘Cooperative learning as a tool for enhancing a web-based Calculus course’, in Proceedings of the ICTM2, Crete, July 2002.Google Scholar
  9. Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A 2004, ‘Technologies involved in the teaching of undergraduate mathematics on the web’, Journal of Online Mathematics and its Applications, in press.Google Scholar
  10. Engelbrecht, J. and Harding, A 2005, ‘Teaching undergraduate mathematics on the web 2: Attributes and possibilities’, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harmon, S.W. and Jones, M.G 1999, ‘The five levels of web use in education: Factors to consider in online courses’, Educational Technology 39(6), 28–32.Google Scholar
  12. Hopper, K.B 2001, ‘Is the internet a classroom?’ TechTrends 45(5), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hutchinson, I 2002, ‘Approaches to WWW mathematics documents’, Retrieved 20 October 2003 from
  14. Kadlubowski, M 2001, ‘Is a paradigm shift required to effectively teach web based instruction?’ in Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2001(1), 213–218. Retrieved 30 October 2003 from
  15. Lemone, K.A 1999, ‘Web-based teaching tools: Addressing the paradigm shift’, inPresentation at Plenary Session of ComCon 7, Athens, Greece, June 1999.Google Scholar
  16. Macdonald, C.J., Stodel, E.J., Farres, L.G., Breithaupt, K. and Gabriel, M.A 2001, ‘The demand-driven learning model: A framework for web-based learning’, Internet and Higher Education 4, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Relan, A. and Gilani, B.B 1997, ‘Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: similarities and differences’, in B.H. Khan (ed.), Web-Based Instruction, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, pp. 44–46.Google Scholar
  18. Russel, G. and Holkner, B 2000, ‘Virtual schools’, Futures 32, 887–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schoenfeld, A.H 1988, ‘Uses of computers in mathematics instruction’, in D.A. Smith, G. Porter, L. Leinbach and R. Wenger (eds.), Computers and Mathematics: The Uses of Computers in Undergraduate Instruction, Mathematical Association of America, Washington.Google Scholar
  20. Sims, R., Dobbs, G. and Hand, T 2001, ‘Proactive evaluation: New perspectives for ensuring quality in online learning applications’, in Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 2001, Melbourne, pp. 509–517. Retrieved 15 October 2003 from
  21. Stiles, M.J 2000, ‘Effective learning and the virtual learning environment’, in: EUNIS 2000: Towards Virtual Universities: Proceedings of the European University Information System 2000 Conference held at INFOSYSTEM 2000, Instytut Informatyki Politechniki Poznanskiej, Poznan, Poland, pp. 171–180.Google Scholar
  22. Suanpang, P., Petocz, P. and Kalceff, W 2003, ‘Student attitudes to learning business statistics online vs. traditional methods’, Learning for unknown future, New Zealand, HERSA, 6–9 July 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics & Applied MathematicsUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations