Cognitive Load as Motivational Cost

  • David F. FeldonEmail author
  • Gregory Callan
  • Stephanie Juth
  • Soojeong Jeong


Research on cognitive load theory (CLT) has focused primarily on identifying the mechanisms and strategies that enhance cognitive learning outcomes. However, CLT researchers have given less attention to the ways in which cognitive load may interact with the motivational and emotional aspects of learning. Motivational beliefs have typically been assumed to be merely a precursor to the cognitive process. This view provides an incomplete picture of the dynamic relationship between cognitive load and motivational beliefs. In this review, we synthesize previous scholarly efforts concerning the motivational effects of anticipated investment of mental effort, new developments in the expectancy-value theory of motivation, and recent findings implicating cognitive load in the formulation of motivational beliefs. By conceptualizing cognitive load as motivational cost, we argue that motivational beliefs are an important outcome that results from instruction. We examine recent empirical evidence supporting this proposition and consider the implications for the further development of both CLT and motivational theories through their integration.


Cognitive load theory Expectancy value cost theory Motivation Self-efficacy 



  1. Adams, E. J., Nguyen, A. T., & Cowan, N. (2018). Theories of working memory: differences in definition, degree of modularity, role of attention, and purpose. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 340–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayres, P. (2006). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres, P. (2018). Subjective measures of cognitive load: What can they reliability measure? In R. Z. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive load measurement and application: a theoretical framework for meaningful research and practice (pp. 9–28). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barron, K. E., & Hulleman, C. S. (2015). The expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 503–509). Oxford: Elsevier Ltd..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College women’s value orientations toward family, career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 56–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck, J. W., & Schmidt, A. M. (2018). Negative relationships between self-efficacy and performance can be adaptive: the mediating role of resource allocation. Journal of Management, 44, 555–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boekaerts, M. (2017). Cognitive load and self-regulation: attempts to build a bridge. Learning and Instruction, 51, 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task value in predicting college students’ course enrollments and intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 553–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callan, G. L., & Cleary, T. J. (2018). Multidimensional assessment of self-regulated learning with middle school math students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33, 103–111.Google Scholar
  15. Cennamo, K. S. (1993). Learning from video: Factors influencing learners' preconceptions and invested mental effort. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cennamo, K. S., Savenye, W. C., & Smith, P. L. (1991). Mental effort and video-based learning: the relationship of preconceptions and the effects of interactive and covert practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, A., & Liu, X. (2009). Task values, cost, and choice decisions in college physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28, 192–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, J. A., & Usher, E. L. (2013). Profiles of the sources of science self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chiang, E. S., Byrd, S. P., & Molin, A. J. (2011). Children’s perceived cost for exercise: application of an expectancy-value paradigm. Health Education and Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 38(2), 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clark, R. E. (1999). The CaNE (Commitment and Necessary Effort) model of work motivation: a two-stage process of goal commitment and mental effort. In J. Lowyck (Ed.), Trends in corporate training. Leuven, Belgium: University of Leuven Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5), 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cleary, T. J., Velardi, B., & Schnaidman, B. (2017). Effects of the Self-Regulation Empowerment Program (SREP) on middle school students’ strategic skills, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 64, 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Conley, A. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Covington, M. (2009). Self-worth theory: retrospects and prospects. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 141–170). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Cowan, N. (2001). Metatheory of storage capacity limits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 154–176.Google Scholar
  26. Davis-Kean, P. E., Huesmann, L. R., Jager, J., Collins, W. A., Bates, J. E., & Lansford, J. E. (2008). Changes in the relation of self-efficacy beliefs and behaviors across development. Child Development, 79(5), 1257–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Denissen, J. J. A., Zarrett, N. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78(2), 430–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: the new psychology of success. London, England: Constance and Robinson.Google Scholar
  31. Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender. Roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. In A. S. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1991). Gender differences in sport involvement: applying the Eccles' expectancy-value model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 3, 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–138). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  38. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Eccles, J. S., Vida, M. N., & Barber, B. (2004). The relation of early adolescents’ college plans and both academic ability and task-value beliefs to subsequent college enrollment. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Feldon, D. F. (2007). Implications of research on expertise for curriculum and pedagogy.  Educational Psychology Review, 19, 91–110.Google Scholar
  42. Feldon, D. F., Franco, J., Chao, J., Peugh, J., & Maahs-Fladung, C. (2018).  Self-efficacy change associated with a cognitive load-based intervention in an undergraduate biology course. Learning & Instruction, 56, 64–72.Google Scholar
  43. Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: the forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 104–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Cierniak, G. (2009). The scientific value of cognitive load theory: a research agenda based on the structuralist view of theories. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gobet, F. (1998). Expert memory: a comparison of four theories. Cognition, 66(2), 115–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A., & Komulainen, E. (2008). Academic self-beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of student achievement in Mathematics: a structural model. Educational Psychology, 28(1), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: a developmental perspective (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  50. Heggestad, E. D., & Kanfer, R. (2005). The predictive validity of self-efficacy in training performance: little more than past performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 84–97.Google Scholar
  51. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Huang, X. (2017). Example-based learning: effects of different types of examples on student performance, cognitive load and self-efficacy in a statistical learning task. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Huang, X. (2018). Personal communication. October, 12, 2018.Google Scholar
  54. Jiang, Y., Rsoenzweig, E. Q., & Gaspard, H. (2018). An expectancy-value-cost approach in predicting adolescent students’ academic motivation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: how many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kalyuga, S., & Plass, J. L. (2018). Cognitive load as a local characteristic of cognitive processes: Implications for measurement approaches. In R. Z. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive load measurement and application: a theoretical framework for meaningful research and practice (pp. 59–74). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Kester, L., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). Instructional control of cognitive load in the design of complex learning environments. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 109–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kimchi, R. (1982). Mental effort and task interference in auditory attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 473–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Klassen, R. M., & Usher, E. L. (2010). Self-efficacy in educational settings: recent research and emerging directions. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 16A. The decade ahead: theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 1–33). Bigley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  60. Knörzer, L., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2016). Facilitators or suppressors: effects of experimentally induced emotions on multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lawson, A. E., Banks, D. L., & Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 706–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van Gog, T., van Der Vleuten, C. P., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Likourezos, V., & Kalyuga, S. (2017). Instruction-first and problem-solving-first approaches: alternative pathways to learning complex tasks. Instructional Science, 45(2), 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Luttrell, V. R., Callen, B. W., Allen, C. S., Wood, M. D., Deeds, D. G., & Richard, D. C. S. (2010). The mathematics value inventory for general education students: development and initial validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Martin, S. (2018). A critical analysis of the theoretical construction and empirical measurement of cognitive load. In R. Z. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive load measurement and application: a theoretical framework for meaningful research and practice (pp. 29–44). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sluijsmans, D. M. (2009). Toward a synthesis of cognitive load theory, four-component instructional design, and self-directed learning. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in high-tech and multimedia environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: an approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Park, B., & Brünken, R. (2015). The rhythm method: a new method for measuring cognitive load—an experimental dual-task study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pintrich, P. R. (1990). Implications of psychological research on student learning and college teaching for teacher education. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 826–857). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  80. Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. Student perceptions in the classroom, 7, 149–183.Google Scholar
  81. Plass, J. L., & Kaplan, U. (2015). Emotional design in digital media for learning. In S. Tettegah & M. Gartmeier (Eds.), Emotions, technology, design, and learning (pp. 131–162). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  82. Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: an organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  84. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: motivation, learning, and well-being. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 171–195). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist, 18, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: the differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Salomon, G., & Leigh, T. (1984). Predispositions about learning from, print and television. Journal of Communication, 34(2), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the search for optimal motivation and performance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  89. Schnotz, W., Fries, S., & Horz, H. (2009). Motivational aspects of cognitive load theory. In M. Wosnita, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: from global to local perspectives (pp. 69–96). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
  90. Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1989). Influence of peer-model attributes on children’s beliefs and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schunk, D., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 35–54). New York: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
  93. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (1996). Motivation in education: theory, research and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
  94. Schwoerer, C. E., May, D. R., Hollensbe, E. C., & Mencl, J. (2005). General and specific self-efficacy in the context of a training intervention to enhance performance expectancy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(1), 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Seufert, T. (2018). The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load. Educational Research Review, 24, 116–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy x value effects: regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: a longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. P. (2006). Predicting school achievement from intelligence, self-perceived ability and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34, 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R. S., Hoover, P. B., & Schmidt, A. M. (2000). Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 724–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Measuring cognitive load. In J. Sweller, P. Ayres, & S. Kalyuga (Eds.), Cognitive load theory: explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies (pp. 71–85). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: a latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 763–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 524–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Vallerand, R. J. (2001). A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 263–319). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  110. Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., & Williams, A. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., Tischner, E. C., & Putka, D. J. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 506–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (2007). Motivational interventions that work: themes and remaining issues. Educational Psychologist, 42, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 933–1002). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  117. Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Yeh, Y. Y., & Wickens, C. D. (1988). Dissociation of performance and subjective measures of workload. Human Factors, 30, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2008). Subjective cognitive effort: a model of states, traits, and time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2013). Revisiting the functional properties of self-efficacy: a dynamic perspective. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1385–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: concepts, findings, and future directions. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165–184). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2018). Grace under pressure in educational contexts: emotional intelligence, stress, and coping. In K. Keefer, J. Parker, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in education (pp. 82–110). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  123. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Utah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations