Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 1283–1289 | Cite as

Female Participation as Top-Producing Authors, Editors, and Editorial Board Members in Educational Psychology Journals from 2009 to 2016

  • Hannah K. Greenbaum
  • Hayden L. Goodsir
  • M Cecil SmithEmail author
  • Daniel H. Robinson
REFLECTION ON THE FIELD

Abstract

This article examines top-producing female authors, editors, and editorial board members in five educational psychology journals (i.e., Cognition and Instruction, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Educational Psychologist, Educational Psychology Review, and Journal of Educational Psychology) from 2009 to 2016. Results extend data from four previous studies (Evans et al. Educational Psychology Review, 17(3), 263–271, 2005; Fong et al. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–277, 2009; Greenbaum et al. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 215–223, 2016; Robinson et al. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 331–343, 1998) and also compare top female authors to the top male authors. The top-producing women in the field have, on average, less seniority in the field than do top male authors. Male authors have more publications, on average, and more sole authorships and first authorships, as compared to female authors. No discernible progress has been made by women in terms of editorial board memberships or editorships since 2004.

Keywords

Publication productivity Educational psychology Gender 

References

  1. American Educational Research Association. (2018). Total AERA membership by member type, 2007 to 2017. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. (2016). Demographic characteristics of Division 15 members by membership status. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/about/division/officers/services/div15-2016.pdf.
  3. American Psychological Association. (2017). Demographic characteristics of APA members by membership type. http://www.apa.org/workforce/publications/16-member-profiles/index.aspx?tab=2.
  4. Ceci, S., Ginther, D., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. (2014). Women in academic science: a changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75–141.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clay, R. A. (2017). Women outnumber men in psychology, but not in the field’s top echelons. Monitor on Psychology, 48, 18.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, J. L., Hsieh, P., & Robinson, D. H. (2005). Women’s involvement in educational psychology journals from 1976 to 2004. Educational Psychology Review, 17(3), 263–271.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-5619-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fong, C. J., Yoo, J. H., Jones, S. J., Torres, L. G., & Decker, M. L. (2009). Trends in female authorships, editorial board memberships, and editorships in educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9108-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenbaum, H., Meyer, L., Smith, M. C., Barber, A., Henderson, H., Riel, D., & Robinson, D. H. (2016). Individual and institutional productivity in educational psychology journals from 2009 to 2014. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 215–223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9360-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guyer, L., & Fidell, L. (1973). Publications of men and women psychologists. American Psychologist, 28, 157–160.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hengel, E. (2017). Publishing while female: evidence of gender bias in peer review scrutiny. Retrieved online at http://www.erinhengel.com/research/publishing_female.pdf.
  11. Howard, G. S., Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (1987). Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 42(11), 975–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hsieh, P., Acee, T., Chung, W., Hsieh, Y., Kim, H., Thomas, G. D., & Robinson, D. H. (2004). An alternate look at educational psychologist’s productivity from 1991 to 2002. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jagsi, R., Guancial, E. A., Worobey, C. C., Henault, L. E., Chang, Y., Starr, R., Tarbell, N. J., & Hylek, E. M. (2006). The “gender gap” in authorship of academia medical literature—a 35-year perspective. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(3), 281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marsh, H. W., Jayasinghe, U. W., & Bond, N. W. (2011). Gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications: a substantive-methodological synergy in support of the null hypothesis model. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 167–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mauleon, E., Hillian, L., Moreno, L., Gomez, I., & Bordons, M. (2012). Assessing gender imbalance among journal authors and editorial board members. Scientometrics, 95, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McSweeney, F. K., Donahoe, P., & Swindell, S. (2000). Women in applied behavior analysis. Behavior Analyst, 23(2), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Metz, I., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). Gender diversity in editorial boards of management journals. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(4), 540–557.Google Scholar
  18. Morton, M. J., & Sonnad, S. S. (2007). Women on professional society and journal editorial boards. Journal of the National Medical Association, 99(7), 764–771.Google Scholar
  19. Patterson-Hazley, M., & Kiewra, K. A. (2013). Conversations with four highly productive educational psychologists: Patricia Alexander, Richard Mayer, Dale Schunk, and Barry Zimmerman. Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter, C. L., Christian, L., & Poling, A. (2003). Participation of women as authors and editors in journals concerned with mental retardation and related topics. American Association of Mental Retardation, 41(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Robinson, D. H., McKay, D., Katayama, A. D., & Fan, A. (1998). Are women underrepresented as authors and editors of educational psychology journals? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 331–343.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1997.0967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sidhu, R., Rajashekhar, P., Lavin, V. L., Parry, J., Attwood, J., Holdcroft, A., & Sanders, D. S. (2009). The gender imbalance in academic medicine: a study of female authorship in the United Kingdom. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 102(8), 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, M. C., Plant, M., Carney, C. S., Jackson, A. A., Johnson, L. S., Lange, H., & Mathis, F. S. (2003). Productivity of educational psychologists in educational psychology journals, 1997-2001. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 422–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00044-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stegmaier, M., Palmer, B., & Van Assendelft, L. (2011). Getting on the board: the presence of women in political science journal editorial positions. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 799–800.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannah K. Greenbaum
    • 1
  • Hayden L. Goodsir
    • 1
  • M Cecil Smith
    • 2
    Email author
  • Daniel H. Robinson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Counseling, Rehabilitation Counseling, & Counseling Psychology, College of Education and Human ServicesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Learning Sciences and Human Development, College of Education and Human ServicesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  3. 3.Department of Curriculum & InstructionUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations